Cases

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0056 ══════════ CPS Energy, Petitioner, v. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════

THIRD DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., DOYLE, P. J., and HODGES, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. A

416 B.R. 801 (2009) In re ELECTRIC MACHINERY ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. Electric Machinery Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc., The Clark Construction Group, Inc., and Construct Two Construction Managers, Inc., individually and as joint venturers trading as Hunt/Clark/Construct Two, a Joint Venture, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 8:03-bk-11047-MGW. Adversary No. 8:03-ap-00811-MGW.

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 18, 2024

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor Peticionario v. 2025 TSPR 126 Luma Energy, LLC; LUMA Energy 216 DPR ___ ServCo, LLC; Negociado de Energía de Puerto Rico; Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica Recurridos Número del Caso: CT-2025-0003 Fecha: 1 de diciembre de 2025 Representante legal de la parte peticionaria

SECOND DIVISION RICKMAN, C. J., MILLER, P. J., PIPKIN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules J

THIRD DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., GOBEIL and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules October 28, 2019 In th

El Juez Asociado Señor Feliberti Cintrón emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En el proceso de resolver este recurso pautamos sobre varios temas que inciden en el mecanismo de sentencia sumaria. Primeramente, rechazamos el uso de una decla-ración jurada diseñada por una parte, específicamente, para contradecir el testimonio provisto por ésta bajo jura-mento en una deposición anterior, con el propósito de im-

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO José J. Zapata Berríos y la Sociedad de Bienes Gananciales constituida por éste y Luz María Rivera Rolón Certiorari Recurridos 2013 TSPR 95 v. 189 DPR ____ J.F. Montalvo Cash & Carry, Inc. Peticionaria Número del Caso: CC-2012-152 Fecha: 27 de agosto de 2013 Región Judicial de Bayamón

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HENRY J. BOROFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This case presents an issue of first impression in the First Circuit: whether a creditor’s supply of electricity to a debtor within the 20 days preceding the commencement of a bankruptcy case constitutes a sale of goods, entitling the creditor to a priority administrative expense claim under § 503(b)(9) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

ACCEPTED 01-15-00774-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:53:36

Related to ECF Nos. 4, 75, 516, 923, & 938 MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. HOUSER, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY, AND VENUE... 355 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 356 A. Factual and Computation Stipulations of the Parties... 356 B. Facts Found Due to this Court’s Application of Collateral Estopp

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM