Cases

MAYER, Circuit Judge. Carolyn J. Patrick (“Mrs. Patrick”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying her application for an award of attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Patrick v. Shin

MAYER, Circuit Judge. Mary Reeves (“Mrs. Reeves”), the surviving spouse of veteran Corby Reeves (“Reeves”), appeals a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) that rejected Reeves’ assertion of clear and unmistakable error (“CUE”) in an April 1983 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“board”). See Reeves v. Shinseki, No

467 F.Supp.2d 544 (2006) Edward Bernard MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant. No. CA 204-2237-PMD-RSC. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. December 11, 2006. *545 *546 Chalmers Carey Johnson, Chalmers Johnson Law Firm, Charleston, SC,

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge MAYER, in which Circuit Judges RICH, NEWMAN, PLAGER, CLEVENGER and GAJARSA join. Opinion concurring in result filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON, in which Circuit Judges LOURIE, RADER and SCHALL join. MAYER, Chief Judge. Harold E. Bailey appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals dismissing

105 F.Supp.2d 953 (2000) HOOSIER ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC, Protect Our River Environment, Protect Our Woods Inc, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT M. Walker, in His Official Capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Army, Joe N. Ballard, Lieutenant General, in His Official Capacity as Commander and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Harry L. SPEAR, Colonel, in His Official Capacity as Dist

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division STATE OF MISSOURI ex rel. ) ANDREW BAILEY, ) ) Relator, ) ) v. ) No. SD37749

ENTITLEMENT TO RESERVIST DIFFERENTIAL PAY UNDER THE PRE- AMENDMENT VERSION OF 5 U.S.C. § 5538 Under the pre-amendment version of 5 U.S.C. § 5538, covered employees may receive reservist differential pay not only for pay periods that occur when they are serving on active duty, but also for those pay periods that fall within the additional period in which they have re-employment rights following the completion of that duty.

(2008) VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE and Veterans United for Truth, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. James B. PEAKE, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Veterans Affairs; James P. Terry, Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals; Daniel L. Cooper, Under Secretary, Veterans Benefits Administration; Bradley G. Mayes, Director, Compensation and Pension Service; Dr. Michael J. Kussman, Under Secretary, Veterans Health Administration; Pritz K. Navara

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. The Federal Labor Relations Authority seeks enforcement of its order requiring that the United States Department of the Navy disclose to a union, designated an exclusive bargaining representative, the home addresses of employees within a particular bargaining unit. Our inquiry focuses on whether disclosure of these home addresses is permissible under either of

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-3077 JOHN E. KIRKENDALL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent. John E. Kirkendall, of Floral City, Florida,

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3030 ROBERT K. OJA, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent. Marianne Dugan, Facaros & Dugan, of Eugene, Oregon, argued for p

294 F.Supp.2d 305 (2003) James E. McMILLAN III, Plaintiff, v. TOGUS REGIONAL OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, et al., Defendants. No. 03-CV-1074 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 25, 2003. James E. McMillan III, pro se. Robert H. Pees, Natasha G. Kohne, Joseph P. Esposito, P

966 F.2d 747 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2361, 60 USLW 2780 FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner in 90-3690,v.U.S. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Navy Ships Parts ControlCenter, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet MaterialSupport Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, NAVSEALogistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, NavyPublishing and Printing Service, Respondents,American Federati

94 F.Supp.2d 68 (2000) Vanessa BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. William J. HENDERSON, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-02224 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 20, 2000. *69 Irving Kator, Kator, Scott & Parks, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Michael A. Humphreys, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of United Stat

ORDER On January 25,1997, the appellant filed his Notice of Appeal (NOA) from an August 8, 1996, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision. The appellant’s NOA was received by the Court more than 120 days after the BVA mailed notice of its decision. On February 12, 1997, the appellant filed a supplemental NOA and provided the Court with an explanation for his untimely appeal. In his supplemental NOA, the appellant asserts that he had

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: Appellant James B. Stanley appeals from the district court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant. Appellant brought suit against the United States 1 under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), § 2671 et seq. to recover for injuries sustained allege

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA XINGRU LIN, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 16-645 (CKK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 30, 2020) Plaintiff, a bus company ticketing agent, claims that the District of Columbia

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL November 9, 2021 290 NOVEMBER, 2021 339 Conn. 290 Anthony A. v. Commissioner of Correction ANTHONY A. v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION* (SC 20499) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The petitioner sought a wri

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Eric Jackson is a member of the Army National Guard and a former employee of the City of Birmingham. He worked for the City as a parking enforcement officer from February 2012 until the City terminated his employment in August 2014. While working for the City, Mr. Jackson was called to active duty in Afghanistan. When he returned from his military service, Mr. Jackson s

MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Some cases are easy. For example, consider a case in which a former police officer sues over her dismissal. The facts show that for two hours or so, while she was supposed to be on patrol, she stepped behind the counter at a Kangaroo convenience/gas mart and ran a cash register— while wearing her police uniform. She never told her superv