⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Baha Mar Ltd.”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 75 A.D.3d 419; 904 N.Y.S.2d 61
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered February 11, 2010, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s and third-party defendant’s (herein collectively plaintiff) motion for summary judgment declaring that plaintiff validly exercised its right to terminate the subject subscription *420agreement, that the subscription agreement has been terminated, and that plaintiff has no
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001-08-29 · Published · cited 0× · 799 So. 2d 525; 2000 La.App. 4 Cir. 2011; 2001 La. App. LEXIS 2414; 2001 WL 1464187
11 JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Judge. This is a trip-and-fall personal injury case. The trial court found the defendant liable, assessed fault 90% to the defendant and 10% to the plaintiff, and determined the damages to be $160,000 (which sum includes $22,224.87 medical expenses and $6,084.82 lost wages) which damages, reduced by 10%, result in a judgment of $144,000. The defendant appeals as to liability, apportionment of fault a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 02030
BML Props. Ltd. v China Constr. Am., Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 02030) BML Props. Ltd. v China Constr. Am., Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 02030 Decided on April 08, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008-04-23 · Published · cited 3× · 547 F. Supp. 2d 879; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33336
(2008) The NATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF the BAHA'IS OF the UNITED STATES of America UNDER the HEREDITARY GUARDIANSHIP, INC., Counter-Defendant. v. NATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF the BAHA'IS OF the UNITED STATES of America, INC., Defendant. Case No. 64 CV 1878. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 23, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPI
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CTF DEVELOPMENT, INC. and ) PERFECT LUCK ASSETS LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0459-KSJM ) BML PROPERTIES LTD., )
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-01-26 · Published · cited 3× · 130 Fed. Cl. 320; 2017 U.S. Claims LEXIS 33; 2017 WL 372055
RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Motion to Dismiss; Jurisdiction; Submission of Claims to Contracting Officer; RCFC 9(k); Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Breach of Contract; Contractual Duty; Implied Obligation; Superior Knowledge; Mutual Mistake; Misrepresentation; Concealment; Good Faith and Fan* Dealing; Impossibility of Performance; Commercial Impracticability; Restitution for Frustrat
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 239 So. 3d 103
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-943 Lower Tribunal No. 16-9184 ________________ TBI Caribbean Company LTD., etc., et al.,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 15× · 106 F.4th 1079
USCA11 Case: 22-11324 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 06/28/2024 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11324 ____________________ MAURICIO USME, LUKASZ ZUTEREK, CAROLINA VASQUEZ,
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 ME 38
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2026 ME 38 Docket: Yor-25-46 Argued: October 9, 2025 Decided: April 23, 2026 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, DOUGLAS, and LIPEZ, JJ. TABAREK T. H. ALDARRAJI v. TAREQ I. ALOLWAN LIPEZ, J. [¶1] Tabarek T. H. Aldarraji appeals from a j
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 842 F.3d 1350; 120 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1857; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21672; 2016 WL 7100357
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO. Opinion dissenting in part filed by Chief Judge PROST. TARANTO, Circuit Judge. In January 2013, Asetek Danmark A/S sued two parties—Cooler Master USA, Inc., which a month later became CMI USA Inc.; and Cooler Master. Co., Ltd., a Taiwanese company—in the Northern District of California, asserting infringement of two of Asetek’s patents, U.S. Patent
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-09-28 · Published · cited 8× · 83 F.4th 868
USCA11 Case: 22-10949 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 09/28/2023 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10949 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-12-29 · Published · cited 9× · 677 F. Supp. 2d 373; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122073; 2009 WL 5201732
677 F.Supp.2d 373 (2009) BARLETTA HEAVY DIVISION, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERIE INTERSTATE CONTRACTORS, INC., Phoenix Development & Construction, Inc., Gregory Zafirakis, Steven Moutsastos, Steven Zafirakis and Erie Painting & Maintenance, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10143-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 29, 2009.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-05-27 · Published · cited 29× · 824 F.3d 483; 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1302; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9730; 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 176; 2016 WL 3063261
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a district court’s order affirming a bankruptcy court judgment rendered after trial in an adversary action. The adversary action comprises the claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses between two sides of a business scheme to buy, renovate, and operate a Days Inn in Sherman, Texas. Abdul Karim Pirani — appellant
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015-09-15 · Published · cited 12× · 537 B.R. 192; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3134; 2015 WL 5444707
MEMORANDUM REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS CASES2 KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are separate motions filed by CCA Bahamas, Ltd. (“CCA”) and The Export-Import Bank of China (“CEX-IM”) to dismiss the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases with prejudice pursuant to Sections 105(a), 109(a), 305(a) and 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (docket nos. 206 and
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 321 F. Supp. 3d 709
AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Non-Party Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Non-Party Chipotle Services, LLC's (collectively "Chipotle") Motion for Contempt (Dkt. # 89). After reviewing the relevant pleadings and motion, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") in 1938. The
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 24-10797 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2026 Page: 1 of 33 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10797 ____________________ BYRON CHEMALY,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009-08-06 · Published · cited 400× · 577 F.3d 1341; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17765; 2009 WL 2391397
PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This petition for review, filed by an Iranian who has converted from Islam to Christianity and claims to fear persecution in Iran where apostasy is punishable by death, places this Court between Scylla and Charybdis. A denial of review will return the petitioner to the theocratic regime in Iran, but an erroneous grant of review could establish a precedent that rewards less than genuine fears of persecut
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 504 F. App'x 900
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Impax”) appeals from the November 8, 2011 decision of the United. States District Court for the District of Delaware explicitly adding Im-pax to a preliminary injunction originally entered in May 2011. The injunction barred all generic versions of AMRIX® from the market. Because Impax was subject to the May 2011 injunction and failed to file a timely appeal, we lack jurisdict
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006-05-22 · Published · cited 11× · 929 So. 2d 267
929 So.2d 267 (2006) Sherry WATTERS, Frances M. Breyne, Gina Recasner, Gretchen Wiltz and Wendy Lemieux Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Department of Health and Hospitals, Division of Administration, BG Real Estate Services, Inc., Baha Towers Limited Partnership, et al. Kristen M. Rhodes, Donalisa Augustus-Jones, and Gerald J. Washington, Sr. v. BG Real Estate Services, Inc., B
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-06-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PETER E. DEUTSCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) C.A. No. 8014-VCL ) ZST DIGITAL NETWORKS, INC., ) ) Defendant. )