Cases

593 F.Supp.2d 310 (2009) Blanca BAEZ, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-30075-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 6, 2009. *311 Richard C. Roth, Law Office of Richard C. Roth, Springfield, MA, for Plaintiff. Karen L. Goodwin, United Stat

(2008) Blanca BAEZ, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-30075-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS and DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1278 JUANA BAEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; CRUZ SANABRIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; ROGELIO RODAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; DEMETRIUS OVIEDO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOSE ALBERTO NUNEZ-GUERRERO, individually and on behalf of all o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Samuel Brooks v. Civil No. 19-cv-1060-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 105 Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration O R D E R Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Samuel Brooks seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administr

89 N.Y.2d 1 (1996) 674 N.E.2d 268 651 N.Y.S.2d 338 In the Matter of Jose Baez, Respondent-Appellant, v. Mary Jo Bane, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Appellants-Respondents. In the Matter of Cesar Cespedes, Respondent-Appellant, v. Mary Jo Bane, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Appellants-Respondents

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12935 STEPHEN FOSTER1 & others2 vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION & other

OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenberger, J. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is a Federal program which was enacted in 1972 to provide financial assistance to the aged, blind, and disabled (42 USC §§ 1381-1383). Congress designed SSI to provide uniform Federal cash assistance, replacing former State-administered programs affording similar, but less comprehensive relief to the same population of qualified recip

Spear, J. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the defendant’s disbursement of a portion of the plaintiff’s retroactive social security income benefits to the city of New Haven. On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the disbursement was improper because (1) the plaintiff’s written authoriza*524tion for such disbursement, required by statute

OPINION OF THE COURT Peter Tom, J. The novel issue raised in this proceeding is whether the New York State Department of Social Services (State DSS) should forfeit its right of reimbursement for interim assistance benefits paid to a recipient when its subsidiary, the New York City Department of Social Services (City DSS), withholds Supplemental Security Income (SSI) checks, issued to the recipient,

711 F.Supp.2d 697 (2008) SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION and AAA Bonding Agency, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-05-cv-2159. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 24, 2008. *700 Joseph S. Grinstein, Susman Godfrey LLP, Alan

Katz, J. This is an appeal from the decision of the habeas court granting the petitioner, David Leroy Copas, a new trial on the basis that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at the time he pleaded guilty to murder and that, but for defense counsel’s deficient performance, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Because the habeas court denied the state certification to appeal, we must first decide w

WALKER, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the amnesty program of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”), Pub.L. No. 99-603, 100 Stat. 3359 et seq. Plaintiffs-appellants (“plaintiffs”) challenge Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) regulations implementing the statutory exclusion of aliens “likely at any time to become a public charge.” See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4) (Supp. II 1990). Pl

Greaney, J. The plaintiffs, Globe Newspaper Company and Sean P. Murphy, one of its reporters (whom we shall refer to collectively as Globe) brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief in the Superior Court pursuant to the public records law, G. L. c. 66, § 10 (b) (1992 ed.), and G. L. c. 231A (1992 ed.),. against the defendant the police commissioner of Boston (commissioner). The district attorney for the

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge *755Plaintiffs Edreweene Raymond ("Raymond"), Adhyl Polanco ("Polanco"), Pedro Serrano ("Serrano"), Sandy Gonzalez ("Gonzalez"), Ritchie Baez ("Baez"), Julio Diaz ("Diaz"), Felicia Whitely ("Whitely"), Roman Goris ("Goris"), Derick Waller ("Waller"), Kareem Abdullah ("Abdullah"), Olayokun Olagoke ("Olagoke"), and Widmarc

Judge Jacobs dissents in a separate opinion. John M. Walker, Jr., Circuit Judge: *733Kareem Bellamy filed this action in the Eastern District of New York under New York state law and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 followi

17‐1859 Bellamy v. City of New York 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 6 AUGUST TERM, 2017 7 8 ARGUED: APRIL 26, 2018 9 DECIDED: JANUARY 29, 2019 10

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On June 20, 2013, the .Plaintiff Jerome Norton (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action against the Defendants the Town of Brookhaven (the “Town” or “Brookha-ven”), Robert Quinlan (“Quinlan”), David J. Moran (“Moran”), Jennifer Lutzer (“Lutzer”), Daniel Belano (“Belano”), Jason Folber (“Folber”), William Powell (“Powell”), Valerie Biscardi (“Biscardi,

10 Wn. App. 437 (1974) 517 P.2d 973 ADELINE S. WILLARD et al., Appellants, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT et al., Respondents. No. 1700-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. January 14, 1974. Hafer, Cassidy & Price and Lawrence Schwerin, for appellants. Slade Gorton, Attorney General, and J

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Lynn Peters, formerly known as Lynn M. Dejac, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, alleging violations of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs claims arise out of the alleged deprivation of her civil rights during the investigation of, and her subsequent prosec

13-3123; 13-3088 In re Reassignment of Cases: Ligon; Floyd et al. v. City of New York, et al. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 13th day of November, two