Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BURNETTE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA”
Goode-Henry v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Goode-Henry v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
Thomas v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIApublic domain
804 A.2d 97 (2002) Marvin THOMAS and Jacqueline Smith, h/w and Margaret Baldino and Diane DePew, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jennifer DePew, her daughter, deceased and Ruby Goode-Henry, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Racquel R. Burnett, her daughter, deceased v. The CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Officer Jay Bigle and Linda Lockwood, as administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Ross. Appeal of Ruby Goode-He
City of Philadelphia v. J. Healey (WCAB)public domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA City of Philadelphia, : Petitioner : : v. : : Joseph Healey (Workers’ : Compensation Appeal Board), : No. 1158 C.D. 2021 Respondent : Argued: March 8, 2023 BEFOR
Burnett v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
McGINLEY, Judge. Wanda Burnett and William A. Burnett (Burnetts) appeal from an order of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas (common pleas court) granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Philadelphia (City). On January 12, 1983, City police officers David Calle and Domonic Ferrara observed motorist Luis Rivera (Rivera) disregard a red light at the intersection of Emerald Street and Allegheny A
Buoniconti v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.. .430 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.. .431 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. .432 IV. LEGAL STANDARD... 433 V. DISCUSSION.. .433 A.Count 1: Eighth Amendment Denial of Medical Care Against All Individual Defendants ... . 4
P. DiLaqua v. City of Philadelphia Fire Dept. (WCAB)public domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Peter DiLaqua, : Petitioner : : v. : : City of Philadelphia Fire Department : (Workers’ Compensation Appeal : Board), : No. 1262 C.D. 2020 Respondent
McCool v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
494 F.Supp.2d 307 (2007) Joseph P. McCOOL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-3393. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 27, 2007. *308 *309 Thomas Bruno, II, Abramson & Denenberg, PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. Gregory
Fulton v. Philadelphiapublic domain
7/16/2021 10:41:51 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (605
Fulton v. Philadelphiapublic domain
7/8/2021 2:30:57 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (606 KB)
Fulton v. Philadelphiapublic domain
8/17/2021 5:07:01 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (604 KB)
Fulton v. Philadelphiapublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Marentette v. City of Canandaiguapublic domain
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark Marentette ("Plaintiff") commenced this civil rights action alleging that Defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they terminated him as Fire Chief of the City of Canandaigua. (Dkt. 21). Specifically, Plaintiff claims that Defendants terminated him without due process, and that Defendan
Summers v. City of Fitchburgpublic domain
Denise J. Casper, United States District Judge *206I. Introduction Plaintiffs Jeffrey D. Summers ("Summers") and Jeffrey's House, Inc. ("Jeffrey's House") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed this lawsuit against Defendants City of Fitchburg ("Fitchburg") and Mark A. Goldstein ("Goldstein"), Jeffrey P. Stephens ("Stephens"),
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA City of Philadelphia, : CASES CONSOLIDATED Petitioner : : v. : : Wayne Deloatch and Independence : Blue Cross (Workers’ Compensation : Appeal Board), : Respondents
538 U.S. 1057 GOODE-HENRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BURNETT, HER DAUGHTER, DECEASEDv.CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. No. 02-1383. Supreme Court of United States. May 27, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. </
Finch v. City of Indianapolispublic domain
Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment DEBRA McVICKER LYNCH, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Plaintiffs Joseph W. Finch, David E. Hensley, and Peter W. Mungovan are police officers employed by the Indianapolis Police Department (“IPD”) and later, its successor, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (“IMPD”). IMPD was created to consolidate
Hobart v. City of Staffordpublic domain
784 F.Supp.2d 732 (2011) Steve HOBART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STAFFORD, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:09-cv-3332. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 29, 2011. *739 James C. Harrington, Texas Civil Rights Project, Austin, TX, Susan E. Hutchison, Foreman Lewis & Hutchison PC, Grap
McDonald v. City of Chicagopublic domain
*748Justice Alito announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, II-B, II-D, and III, in which The Chief Justice, Jus*749tice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, and. Justice Thomas join, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-C, IV, and V, in which The Chief Justice,