Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Darryl Burke, proceeding pro se, brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Burke alleges that he served a FOIA request dated October 26, 2014, on the Transportation Secur

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Darryl Burke is currently serving a thirty-year prison term for bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud. In 2015, he submitted three overlapping Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act requests to the United States Secret Service, a component of the U.S. Department of H

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

*1349 HUGHES, Circuit Judge. Angel Canava was removed from his position as a U.S. Border Patrol Agent pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7371, which mandates the removal of any law enforcement officer who is convicted of a felony. He appeals the Arbitrator’s decision upholding his removal. Because the Arbitrator d

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

MEMORANDUM OPINION [Dkt. # 11] RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Judicial Watch Inc. filed a two-count FOIA complaint against the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) on November 10, 2015. See generally Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. Count One is a “traditional” FOIA claim, in whi

ON MOTION ORDER Martha Rangel moves for reconsideration of the court’s March 13, 2008, 275 Fed.Appx. 955, order dismissing this petition for review for failure to file a corrected brief and appendix. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The March 13 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the pe

ON MOTION ORDER Martha Rangel moves for reconsideration of the court’s March 13, 2008, 275 Fed.Appx. 955, order dismissing this petition for review for failure to file a corrected brief and appendix. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The March 13 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the pe

Stoll, Circuit Judge. Mr. Leonard Boss, a U.S. Border Patrol Agent, challenges a 15-day suspension imposed by his employing agency, Customs and Border Patrol ("CBP"). The suspension was based on three charges. The arbitrator vacated Charge One after finding that the deciding official violated Mr. Boss's procedural due process rights, and he then reduced the suspension to ten days. Mr. B

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) RICA GATORE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-459 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARMENT ) OF HOMELAND SECU

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiffs initiated this civil action against the defendant, the United States Department of Homeland Security, under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012), seeking, inter alia, portions of documents termed “assessments to refer” that were prepared in connection

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2017 Decided July 17, 2018 No. 16-5339 JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:15-

USCA11 Case: 20-12487 Date Filed: 12/20/2021 Page: 1 of 19 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-12487 ____________________ ESTELA MABEL ARGUETA ROMERO, Petitioner-Appellant, versus SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SEC

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. This case is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motions, the responses and replies thereto, the applicable law, and the entire record, defendants’ motion is GRANTED and plaintiffs cross-motio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1100 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

738 F.Supp.2d 93 (2010) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1100 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 20, 2010. *97 Lee Ann Anderson McCall, Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, Washingto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25 - 3501 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OP

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I. Background...982 A. Factual Background...982 1. Mr. Williams's Arrest and Transfer to TCSO Custody...982 2. Mr. Williams's Injury and Lack of Treatment...982 a. October 22-Response to initial injury and transfer to medical unit...982 b. October 23-24-Continued paralysis and arrival of m

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Catholic Charities and eight individual plaintiffs initiated this putative class action against the defendant, the United States Department of Homeland Security, under the Freedom of Information Act (the "FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2012), seeking, inter alia, porti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-30 (RDM) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jason Leopold is an investigative journalist who reports on national security. Dkt. 81-4 at 2 (Leopold Decl. ¶ 11)