Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “BUFFINGTON v. FIRST TOWER LOAN”
Mississippi Department of Revenue v. Comcast of Georgia/Virginia, Inc. n/k/a Comcast Cable Communications, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01134-SCT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. COMCAST OF GEORGIA/VIRGINIA, INC., n/k/a COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/13/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. J. DEWAYNE THOMAS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JON FRANCIS CARMER, JR. BRIDGETTE T. THOMAS MARIA M. TODOROVA SHELDO
WALLER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this case of first impression, this Court must determine whether money a corporation receives as prepayment for future services is subject to franchise taxation during the year in which it is received. The Mississippi Department of Revenue (“MDOR”) assessed additional franchise tax against Fishbelt Feeds, Inc. (“Fish-belt”) for its
Lawson v. Honeywell International, Inc.public domain
WALLER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Plaintiff Pamela Lynn Lawson appeals the trial court’s grants of summary judgment to the defendant, Honeywell International, Inc., on Lawson’s Mississippi Products Liability Act (“MPLA”) claim and her negligence claim arising from injuries Lawson sustained when her seatbelt buckle allegedly malfunctioned during an automobile accident. We affirm the trial court’s g
Pamela Lynn Lawson v. Honeywell International, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-CA-01924-SCT PAMELA LYNN LAWSON v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. f/k/a ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/16/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LESTER F. WILLIAMSON, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: EDWARD A. WILLIAMSON CHRISTOP
T'Bear v. Formanpublic domain
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Caleb Avery t'Bear sued Defendant Barry Forman in California state court for breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory relief, and an accounting arising out of a failed business venture.1 (Dkt. No. 1-1.)2 Defendant removed the action to this Court pursuant to
In Re Erie Golf Coursepublic domain
*606OPINION BY Judge SMITH-RIBNER. The City of Erie (City) appeals from an order of the Erie County Common Pleas Court (trial court) that denied the City’s petition to abandon the use of dedicated public property known as “Erie Golf Course” filed pursuant to the act commonly known as the Donated or Dedicated Property Act (Act), Act of December 15, 1959,
ORDER AND REASONS JONES, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Resolution Trust Corporation’s “Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment,” which was taken under submission on a previous date. Having reviewed the memoranda of the parties, the record and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the motion. Background Interurban Investment Corporation (hereina
Andrade v. Chojnackipublic domain
65 F.Supp.2d 431 (1999) Isabel G. ANDRADE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Phillip J. CHOJNACKI, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. W-96-CA-139 to W-96-CA-147, W-96-CA-373. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division. July 1, 1999. *432 *433 *434 <
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.public domain
OPINION GRANT, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from summary judgment in favor of a title company on claims against it for breach of an escrow contract and breach of fiduciary duties, and from dismissal for failure to state a claim of bad faith breach of contract. FACTS Earl M. Burkons provided his brother-in-law, Arthur Schnitzer, with a power of attorney to sell Bur
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
United States v. United States Steel Corp.public domain
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge. We may say in advance that all the members of this court are in agreement as to the decree that will be entered in this case, although we are not in complete accord concerning every step by which that result is reached. *58The subject-matter of the litigation is of such magnitude and complexity, and the record is of such size, th
ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
In Re Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1public domain
9 F.Supp. 103 (1934) In re CAMERON COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. 1. No. 520. District Court, S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division. December 1, 1934. A. L. Montgomery, of San Benito, Tex., and Greenwood & Lewis and W. B. Lewis, all of Harlingen, Tex., for petitioner. W. P. Hamblen, Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton, and Palmer Hutcheson, all of Houston, Tex.,