Cases

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. The collective bargaining agreement between the parties to this case provides that “[a]ny dispute over the interpretation or application of this Agreement, or other agreements made between Management and employees which can be verified, shall be settled through the grievance procedure” set forth

VINSON, District Judge: The primary question in this labor arbitration appeal is an unusual one: did the arbitrator exceed his power by issuing a substituted award after he determined that he had exceeded his power in the original award? After close review and oral argument, we agree with the district court that he did, and we affirm. I.

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) petitions this Court for enforcement of its July 30, 2004 order, 2004 WL 1748549, issued against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 98 (“the Union”).1 The order affirmed the determination by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) that the Union had committed multiple unfair labor practi

618 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2009) Peter MARCEAU, Jon Bodine, Rhonda McKinney, Brian Pine, Kathryn Smith, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Local 1269, Dex Media, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Karen Ortega-Matson, and Philip Wheeler, Defendants. Case No. CV 05-2874-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2009.

491 F.3d 685 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 21, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2335. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 8, 2006. Decided July 2, 2007. Barry M. Bennett (argued), Justin J

175 F.Supp.2d 220 (2001) Jeffrey M. CAHOON, Executor of the estate of John W. Cahoon, and Carla Graves Cahoon, Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 261, et al., Defendants. No. 3:00CV1888 (RNC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 18, 2001. *221 *222

OPINION BY Judge LEAVITT. West Chester University (University), a state university, petitions for review of a final determination of the Office of Open Records (Open Records) granting-Timothy Browne’s appeal of the University’s denial *1066of his request for records under the Righb-to-Know Law.1 The University denied Bro

129 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2000) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 1654, Plaintiff, v. PHILIPS DISPLAY COMPONENTS, Defendant. No. 3:99CV7486. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 19, 2000. Snyder, Rakay & Spicer, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff. Robert J. Brown, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Thompson, Hine &

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY This case is before the court on appeal from the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the summary judgment motion of appellee Edmund Gromnicki and denied the summary judgment motion of appellant International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 8. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the decision of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas must be reversed. Appellant

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Janice Brown Dorn (“Janice”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant-Appellee Electricians Pension Trust Fund (“the Plan”), dismissing her claim, ostensibly pursuant to a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”), for continued payment of pension benefits following the death of her ex-husband, Jack

992 F.Supp. 162 (1996) BUILDING INDUSTRY FUND et al., Plaintiffs, v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL — CIO et al., Defendants. No. 93 CV 2721. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 8, 1996. Opinion on Reconsideration May 8, 1996. *163

140 F.Supp.2d 384 (2001) PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 94 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 99-3634 (GEB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 6, 2001. *385 Patrick Westerkamp, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff. *386

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, filed April 4, 2017 (Doc. 3)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on April 10, 2017. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has jurisdiction over this case given that Plaintiff Firebird Structures fil

665 F.Supp. 614 (1987) The AUSTIN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 701, Defendant. No. 86 C 6103. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. February 19, 1987. *615 Frank Borda, Bromley, Brown & Walsh, Washington, D.C., Bennett L. Epstein, Coffield Ungaretti Harris

JAMES R. BROWNING Circuit Judge: Robert “Red” Kinney, former business manager and financial secretary of Local 396 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), sued IBEW under Section 102 of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. § 412 and Section 301(b) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, alleging, inter alia, that the union had improperly r

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, current and former machine repair employees of Daimler Chrysler at two Chrysler Jeep plants in Toledo, Ohio, bring suit alleging that various actions taken by union defendants (UAW International (International) and UAW Local 12 (Local 12)) gave preferential treatment to other skilled workers and thus violated the unions’ duty of fair representation.

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Petitioner Local 15, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (“Union”) petitions this Court for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) finding that the Intervenor, Midwest Generation, EME, LLC (“Midwest”), did not violate sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 15

939 F.2d 690 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2866, 119 Lab.Cas. P 10,809 Robert "Red" KINNEY, Individually and as a Member on Behalfof Local Union 396 of the InternationalBrotherhood of Electrical Workers,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, CharlesH. Pillard, Individually, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-2647. Un

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge BUCKLEY. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: I. Introduction This petition for review challenges a dismissal by the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) of an unfair labor practice complaint charging the intervenor, St. Francis Hospital (the “Hospital”), with an unlawful

RYMER, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) petitions for enforcement of its order holding the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 77 (“Local 77”), in violation of § 8(b)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(l)(B)(1982). Local 77 disciplined two members of the International Brotherhood of Electri