Cases

152 F.3d 217 NEW JERSEY COALITION OF ROOMING AND BOARDING HOUSE OWNERS;Louis Cook; John E. Brown; Leonard Levy; CarolWise; Brenda Copeland; Michael Byrne;Beverly Deming; Eugene Hodas,Appellants,v.MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF the CITY OF ASBURY PARK; The City ofAsbury Park, a Municipal Corporation of the State of NewJersey; Mayor and Council of the Township of Neptune; TheTownship of Neptune, a Municipal Corporat

*1252 MARCUS, Circuit Judge: At issue in this case is the constitutionality of the City of Neptune Beach’s sign code. Appellant Solantic, LLC (“Solantic”) argues that the sign code violates the First Amendment in at least two ways: first, it exempts from regulation certain categories of signs based on

OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Washington Township School District’s (“Defendant” or “the District”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on Plaintiffs’ purported failure to exhaust administrative remedies. [Docket Item 8.] In this action, Plaintiffs J.Q. and S.B., individually and on behalf of t

586 F.3d 263 (2009) Mary Kathryn BROWN, Appellant v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH; Pittsburgh City Council; Luke Ravenstahl, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh. No. 08-1819. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 29, 2009. Filed: October 30, 2009. *266 David A. Cortman, Esqui

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0401p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X

CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority argues that Plaintiffs-Midwest Media Property, L.L.C. (“Midwest”), CTI Properties, L.L.C. (“CTI”), and Speckert, L.L.C. (“Speckert”), lack standing to bring this action, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendant Symmes Township (“Defendant” or “Township”), a municipality in Ohio. This result rests on the erroneous conclusion that Plaintiffs “chose[ ] not to challenge

REISNER, J.A.D. *982*588In response to the physical and economic devastation wrought by Superstorm Sandy, the Borough of Belmar took, or planned to take, a series of actions that were inconsistent with a thirty-year-old but still binding court decision in

Case: 12-14009 Date Filed: 12/14/2015 Page: 1 of 82 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 12-14009 _______________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22026-MGC DR. BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, DR. JUDITH SCHAECHTER, DR. TOMMY SCHECHTMAN, AMERIC

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: We sua sponte vacate and reconsider our original opinion in this matter, reported at 760 F.3d 1195. We substitute in its place the following opinion. The Governor of the State of Florida, other Florida officials, and members of the Board of Medicine of the Florida Department of Health (collectively, the “State”), appeal from th

17 N.J. 558 (1955) 112 A.2d 268 WILLIAM BELLINGTON, JOHN J. CLARK AND ELIZABETH CLARK, PARTNERS TRADING AS EAST WINDSOR TRAILER PARK, AND JOHN BROWN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST WINDSOR, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 31, 1955. Decided March 14, 1955.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2477-13T4 A-0107-14T1 IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, Respondent-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION and March 9,

Dismissed in part, affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge AGEE joined. . BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the City of Norfolk on claims that the City’s sign ordinan

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3274-10T3 A-3868-10T3 A-3916-10T3 A-4086-10T3 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97, affiliated wit

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3274-10T3 A-3868-10T3 A-3916-10T3 A-4086-10T3 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97, affiliated wit

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3274-10T3 A-3868-10T3 A-3916-10T3 A-4086-10T3 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97, affiliated wit

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3393-15T4, A-3396-15T4, A-3397-15T4, A-3398-15T4, A-3399-15T4, A-3727-15T4, A-3770-15T4,

The opinion of the court was delivered by CUFF, P.J.A.D. These back-to-back appeals arise from an order dismissing a complaint filed by numerous individuals and groups challenging the legislative apportionment map approved by the State of New Jersey Apportionment Commission (Commission) on April 3, 2011 (the approved map).2 The approved map established New Jersey State Senate an

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0047-25 TOWN OF DOVER, Plaintiff-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION May 21, 2026 v. APPELLATE DIVISION RICHARD GONZALEZ, Defenda

802 A.2d 496 (2002) 173 N.J. 368 Dorothy MATTURRI, Phyllis Healy and the Surviving Children of the Honorable Joseph Healy, and the Retired Judges Association of New Jersey, Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE JUDICIAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent-Respondent. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued September 24, 2001. Decided July 24, 2002.</

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti