Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 562 U.S. 1152, 131 S. Ct. 939, 178 L. Ed. 2d 779, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 347.

In re Tyrone G. Clark & Associates;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 396,254; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA94 1585. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

In re Clark, Tyrone G., & Assoc.; Denta-Care Professional Corp.; — Defendant(s); *824applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW93 1289; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 369,254. Writ denied. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

In re Clark, Tyrone G., & Assoc.; Denta-Care Professional Corp.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW93 1289; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 369,254. Writ granted in part, denied in part, and remanded. Relator’s motion and amended motion to dismiss are denied. The order of injunction issued on July 9

OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON Lamar Brown (Brown), an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution (SCI) at Albion, representing himself, appeals from an order of the Centre County Court of Common Pleas (trial court). 1 The trial court sustained the preliminary objections of A. Clark (Clark), D. Campbe

BROWN V. CLARK CINCINNATI, INC. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-378-CV JOHN F. BROWN APPELLANT V.<

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-378-CV JOHN F. BROWN APPELLANT V. <

707 F.2d 1400 Brownv.Clark 80-1894 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 2/25/83 W.D.Pa., Teitelbaum, J. AFFIRMED

Defendant’s motion for permission to appeal is denied as not timely filed. V.R.A.P. 5(b).

557 S.W.2d 558 (1977) H. B. BROWN, Jr., d/b/a Brown Development Company, Appellant, v. Merriel E. CLARK, d/b/a Clark Brick Sales, Appellee. No. 8459. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. October 18, 1977. *559 M. Mark Lesher, Lesher & Franks, Texarkana, for appellant. David L. James, Keeney, Anderson, Miller, Ol

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CYR, District Judge. The United States Magistrate recommends that plaintiffs be relieved from that portion of the judgment entered on August 11, 19811 which dismissed counts I and IV of their complaint for lack of privity with the defendant manufacturer, because the privity requirement of Maine law was abruptly abolished eight months after judgment,

Per curiam. This negligence action stems from personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident that occurred on February 15, 1970, in North Hampton. Subsequent to the mishap a claims adjuster for defendant’s insurer settled plaintiff’s personal injury claim resulting from the accident for $800 by means of a general release dated June 27. Three and one-half years later on October 11, 1973, plaintiff institu

618 P.2d 267 (1980) Albert Keith BROWN, Albert Keith Brown, as Executor of the Will of Barbara Ann Brown, Steven Keith Brown and Stanley Kent Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and Ward Foods, Inc., a New York Corporation, doing business as G.M. Industries, Defendant-Appellee. No. 6177. Supreme Cour

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Daniel J. Martin brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Clerk of the Youngstown Municipal Court, Sarah Brown-Clark, after she terminated him from his position as a deputy clerk. He alleges that, in violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, Brown-Clark terminated him for his political activities (namely, supporting Brown-Clark’s opponents in the primary and gene

FINDINGS OF FACT I MITCHELL, District Judge. This is a class action by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and its chairman, H. Rap Brown, on behalf of “all black people of the United States of America similarly situated” to restrain the enforcement of the Federal Firearms Act, specifically, Title 15 U.S.C. § 902(e) as amended in 1961, and certain statutes of the State of Louisi

[Cite as State v. Clark, 2021-Ohio-559.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-300 (C.P.C. No. 17CR-5659) v. : (REGULAR C

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge Appellant Ashton Clark appeals the revocation of his probation by the Mississippi County Circuit Court for the underlying charge of residential burglary. He argues on appeal that his revocation should be reversed because (1) there was no corroboration of his codefendant's testimony and (2) the revocation should have been deferred until after the new murder charge was adjudicated. We affirm. On