Cases

I. BACKGROUND...478 II. LEGAL STANDARD...484 III. DISCUSSION...486 A. Discrimination Based on Briggs' Age...486 1. Prima Facie Case...487 2. Pretext...491 B. Retaliation for Complaints Regarding Age Discrimination...496 1. Prima Facie Case...497 2. Pretext...499

[Cite as Briggs v. Wilcox, 2013-Ohio-1541.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98364 TRACY A. BRIGGS, F.K.A. MOELICH PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.

342 S.W.3d 572 (2010) David Mark TEMPLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 14-08-00074-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 21, 2010. Rehearing En Banc Denied May 24, 2011. *581 Dick DeGuerin, Stanley G. Schneider, Houston, for appellant. Alan Curry, Houston, for appellee

344 S.C. 224 (2001) 543 S.E.2d 251 BOB JONES UNIVERSITY, Roy Barton as Personal Representative, and John T. Nimmons, III, of whom Bob Jones University and Roy Barton as Personal Representative are, Appellants, v. Sandra M. STRANDELL, Larry M. Nimmons, Jr. and Christopher Nimmons, Respondents. No. 3288. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard January 8,

799 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2011) Alecia T. CYPRIAN, Plaintiff, v. AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:10-cv-226-MEF. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 1, 2011. *1269 Jamie Austin Johnston, Frank Moseley Wilson, Frank M. Wilson, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff. David R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 5, 2001 Session SALLY QUALLS MERCER, ET AL. v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 98C-2936 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2000-00801-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 5, 2002 This appeal involves a medical

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. I. Issues Raised This appeal arises from suits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 filed by two groups of present and former faculty members against Rutgers, whose official name is Rutgers, The State University, its Board of Governors, and certain Rutgers officials in their individual and official capacities.

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This case presents a straightforward employment and contract dispute mired in a procedural thicket. Our task is to untangle the thicket, although, unhappily, we cannot finally resolve the merits. We conclude, first, that the case was correctly removed by University President Low, a counterclaim defendant newly-joined on a “separate and independen

822 F.2d 1303 40 Ed. Law Rep. 660 Gabor G. KOVATS, Steven C. Procuniar, Joy L. Davis, RobertaM. Delson, Hace Tishler, and Anna Beckv.RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, Board of Governors ofRutgers, The State University, Edward Bloustein, asPresident of Rutgers, The State University and individuallyand John R. Martin, as Vice-President for Personnel ofRutgers, The State University and individually

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice. Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The action arose under the provisions of 45 USCA, §§ 51 to 60, commonly known as the federal employers’ liability act. Plaintiff was 36 years of age at the time of the alleged injury and about 38 at the time of the trial. He had pre

[Cite as Peters v. Highland Hills, 2024-Ohio-2366.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA GEORGE PETERS, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 113372 v. VILLAGE OF HIGHLAND HILLS, : De

RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY NAKAYAMA, J. In May 2014, Appellee-Appellee/Cross-Appellant University of Hawai'i (the University) requested that Appellee-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) consent to a sublease that the University intended to enter into with TMT International O

Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Defendants moved to dismiss John Doe's Complaint. For the reasons that follow, that motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND1 In August 2014, John Doe and Jane Roe2 were both undergraduate students at The Pennsylvania State University's ("PSU's") Universit

657 F.3d 591 (2011) Mondrea VINNING-EL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John EVANS and Rick Sutton, Defendants-Appellants. No. 10-1681. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 25, 2011. Decided September 16, 2011. Mondrea Vinning-El, Menard Correctional Center, Menard, IL, pro se. *592 Bria

J-S24024-19 2019 PA Super 278 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : LEONARD KNOX :

J-S24024-19 2019 PA Super 278 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : LEONARD KNOX :

JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court on the cross Motions for Summary Judgment1 by Defendants, F. King Alexander, Damon Andrew, A.G. Monaco, and Gaston Reinoso ("Defendants") and Plaintiff, Teresa Buchanan ("Plaintiff"). The parties have filed Oppositions2 and Replies3 to the

[Cite as Thomas v. Delgado, 2022-Ohio-4235.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PUTNAM COUNTY BELINDA THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 12-22-06 v. CARLOS S. DELGADO, ET AL., OPINION DEFENDANTS-APPELLEE. Appeal from Putnam County Common Pleas Court Trial Court No.

OPINION PAGE, Justice. In 2012, the governing board of respondent Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center, a nonprofit hospital in Marshall, Minnesota, announced a plan to repeal the hospital’s medical staff bylaws and replace them with revised bylaws. Avera Marshall’s Medical Staff, its Chief of Staff, and Chief of Staff-elect eventually commenced an action seeking, as relevant here, a declaration that th

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and