Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BREWER v. 3M COMPANY”
3m Company v. Boulterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon remand from the Court of Appeals. While this matter was on interlocutory appeal, the District of Columbia filed a motion to dismiss its appeal and to vacate the portion of this Court’s opinion that was the subject of the appeal. The Court of App
3m Company v. Boulterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff 3M Company (“3M”) has sued Defendants Lanny J. Davis, Lanny J. Davis & Associates, PLLC, Davis-Block LLC (collectively the “Davis Defendants”), and Harvey Boulter, Porton Capital Technology Funds, Porton Capital, Inc. (collectively the “Porton Defendants”) for a number of claim
Bell v. 3M Co.public domain
R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge Defendants Tyco Fire Products, Chemguard and 3M move to dismiss plaintiffs' medical monitoring claims, arguing that Colorado's appellate courts have not recognized such a cause of action. Tyco and Chemguard alternatively request that the issue be certified to the Colorado Supreme Court. Several other defendants ask to join one or both of the motions to dismiss. I decline to certify the
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. 3M Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. (the “Riv-erkeeper”) filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under Section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. *1156§ 6972(a)(1)(B) (the “RCRA”). Doc. 1. The court has for consider
Meda AB v. 3M Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: This action arises out of the acquisition in late 2006 and early 2007 by Plaintiff Meda AB (“Meda”) of a European pharmaceutical business from Defendant 3M Company (“3M”). Meda alleges that 3M breached the acquisition agreement signed on November 8, 2006 (“Acquisition Agreement”), as well as the implied covenant of good faith and fair deali
City of Lake Elmo v. 3M Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION On November 22, 2016, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Defendant 3M Company’s (“3M”) Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 25], Plaintiff City of Lake Elmo (“Lake Elmo”) is suing 3M to recover costs incurred in response to the discovery of perflouro-chemicals in its drink
3M Company and Subsidiariespublic domain
United States Tax Court 160 T.C. No. 3 3M COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent ————— Docket No. 5816-13. Filed February 9, 2023. ————— P is the common parent company of the P consolidated group. As
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.public domain
OPINION WRIGHT, Justice. This ease presents several issues regarding disqualification of legal counsel because of a violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.9(a) arising from a conflict of interest with a former client. These issues include who has standing to appeal a district court order granting a motion to disqualify, the legal standard for determining whether Rule 1.9(a) has been violated, and whether t
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs in this case are West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority (the “Authority”), in its individual capacity, and Tommy Lindsey, Lanette Lindsey, and Larry Watkins (collectively “Representative Plaintiffs”), who bring this action both individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated.
ACCEPTED 05-15-00669-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 7/9/2015 8:29:14 AM
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. 3M Co.public domain
*158ORDER DAVID W. DANIEL, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Florida Power & Light Company’s (“FP & L”) motion to compel Plaintiffs’1 production of certain unredacted documents [CP & L DE-559; Consol DE-556]. Plaintiffs have responded [CP & L DE-567; Consol DE-5
188 F.3d 446 (7th Cir. 1999) Elizabeth Karlin, M.D.; Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc.; Gary T. Prohaska, M.D.; Dennis D. Christensen, M.D.; and Summit Women's Health Organization, on behalf of themselves and their patients seeking abortions, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.C. William Foust, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Dane County and a representative of the class of all district attorneys in Wisconsin; Ja
Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.public domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Karalee Alaine Williams ("Williams") was found dead in her car in the parking lot of Wal-Mart Store #2439. Her death resulted from inhaling a large quantity of aerosol dust remover. Williams's mother, Plaintiff-Appellant Deleese Allen ("Allen"), brought negligence claims in her individual capacity, against Defendants-Appellees
*729 BENTON, Circuit Judge. Matthew Leonard says the volunteer release agreement he signed is unconscionable and lacks consideration. He objects to arbitration with Delaware North Companies Sport Service, Inc. (DNCS). The district court 2 compell
Estate of Blandford v. A.O. Smith Corp.public domain
[Cite as Estate of Blandford v. A.O. Smith Corp., 2016-Ohio-2835.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103030 ESTATE OF IAN W. BLANDFORD, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. Bakerpublic domain
989 S.W.2d 151 (1999) 337 Ark. 94 MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Theodore BAKER, Appellee. No. 98-1290. Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 25, 1999. *153 Gail Ponder Gaines, Little Rock, for appellant. Zan Davis, Little Rock, for appellee. <
Kocher v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Kocher v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-1311.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY SUSAN KOCHER ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASCENT RESOURCES-UTICA, LLC ET AL., D
*807ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Aviva Sports, Inc. (Aviva) brought this action against Defendants Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. (Finger-hut), Menard, Inc. (Menard), Kmart Corporation (Kmart), WalMart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), and Manley Toys, Ltd. (Manley), alleging patent infringement and false advertising in violation of the
Spoor v. Barthpublic domain
McCULLOUGH, Judge. *671 Plaintiff Richard Spoor appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants John M. Barth and *672 John M. Barth, Jr. Based on th
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-01273-SCT THE PROMENADE D’IBERVILLE, LLC v. JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/11/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHRISTOPHER LOUIS SCHMIDT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JAMES GRADY WYLY, III JOSEPH JEFFREY L