Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 5, 2016 (Doc. 97)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on August 8, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Michelle Romero, as sister and next friend of Alejandro Romero, Jr., sufficiently states a claim

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. This appeal involves claims of overdetention by Mr. Mariano Moya and Mr. Lonnie Petry. Both men were arrested based on outstanding warrants and detained in a county jail for 30 days or more prior to their arraignments. These arraignment delays violated New Mexico law, which requires arraignment of a defendant within 15 days of arrest.

OPINION BUMB, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Miguel Duran brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts various constitutional torts related to his pre-trial detention at the Atlantic County Justice Facility. Currently before the Court are three summary judgment motions brought by defendant CFG Health Systems LLC (“CFG”) [Dkt. Ent. 266]; individual defendants Warden Gary

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION A. KATHLEEN TOMLINSON, U.S. Magistrate Judge I. Preliminary Statement Pro se Plaintiff Jesswill Perez (“Plaintiff’) brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of the Fourth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution arising from incidents which occurred while he was a pre-trial detainee.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Appellants seek reversal of the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss claims asserted against them by Michael Wilson, Sr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Wilson alleges he was unlawfully detained and deprived of his constitutional right to a prompt probable cause determination. Appellants claim they are entitl

This matter is before the court on the appellants' Petition for Rehearing En Banc . We also have a response from the appellees. Upon consideration, a majority of the original panel members grant panel rehearing in part and only to the extent of the limited changes made to the attached revised opinion. Panel rehearing is otherwise denied. The Clerk is directed to file the amend

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This case presents the question whether mandatory parole in the federal prison system is mandatory. It is not. That counterintuitive result understandably led Plaintiff Artie Dufur, a pro se prisoner who is serving a parole-eligible federal life sentence, to challenge the decision of Defendant United States Parole Commission ("the Commission") denying him parole. Dkt. 1 at 2-3

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

USCA11 Case: 21-12540 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 02/09/2023 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12540 ____________________ LOUIS MATTHEW CLEMENTS,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0180p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ESTATE OF SETH MICHAEL ZAKORA; BRANDY ZAKORA, │ in her capacity as

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves a public university’s investigation into a student’s claims that another student sexually assaulted her in a university dorm. Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges that defendant University of Alabama in Huntsville discriminated against her because of her sex in violation of Title IX of the Educa

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

710 F.Supp.2d 248 (2008) Wlodzimierz J. DZWONCZYK, Plaintiff, v. SYRACUSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; Syracuse Housing Authority Security; John Doe, Syracuse Housing Authority Detective; Gary Miguel, Chief of Police, Syracuse City Police Department; Onondaga County Sheriff's Office; Onondaga County Justice Center; John Does, in Their Official and Individual Capacities, Defendants. No. 5:08-CV-00557 (NPM/DEP).

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge In this lawsuit, Plaintiff William Kenley recounts a particularly unpleasant experience with the Metropolitan Police Department. On June 20, 2013, he alleges that he witnessed MPD officers assaulting and arresting his friend without any justification, so he began to videotape the

USCA11 Case: 18-13524 Date Filed: 03/14/2022 Page: 1 of 182 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13524 ____________________ CROSLEY ALEXANDER GREEN, Petitioner-Appellee, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNE

790 F.Supp.2d 241 (2011) MURAKUSH CALIPHATE OF AMEXEM INC., d/b/a Murakush Imperial Temple of Amexem, Plaintiff, v. State of NEW JERSEY et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 11-1317 (RBK). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 13, 2011. *242 OPINION ROBERT B. KUGLER, District Judge. This