Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BRAD G CAMPBELL”
Brad Namdar v. Stephen Christopher Suprunpublic domain
AFFIRM and Opinion Filed November 13, 2024. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00193-CV BRAD NAMDAR, Appellant V. STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER SUPRUN, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas
John Riebsame v. Brad Schemelpublic domain
09/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 1, 2019 JOHN RIEBSAME V. BRAD SCHEMEL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 18C709 Ward Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge
Charles Kaminski v. Brad Coulterpublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. This is a complicated case about the scope of governmental immunity. The plaintiffs-appellees are retirees of the City of Lincoln Park. In 2014, the city’s dire financial condition led Michigan officials to place the city under the purview of an Emergency Manager pursuant to the authority granted by P.A. 436.1 The Emergency Manager, with the approva
Don Morris v. Brad Crainpublic domain
Crone, Judge. Case Summary Don Morris and Randy Coakes (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Brad Crain and Richard Redpath (“Crain”). 1 The sole restated issue presented for our review is whether the trial court erred when it entered summary jud
Brad and Christine Francis v. Director of Revenuepublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District BRAD AND CHRISTINE FRANCIS, ) ) Appellants, ) WD84199 ) v.
Garcia White v. Brad Livingstonpublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-70004 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ROBERT CHARLES LADD, January 28, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce
Paul Eichwedel v. Brad Currypublic domain
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Paul Eichwedel is an inmate in the Dixon Correctional Center (“DCC”), a prison operated by the Illinois Department of *663 Corrections (“IDOC”) in Dixon, Illinois. During the course of unrelated civil litigation in federal court against various IDOC officials, Mr. Eichwedel, w
Campbell v. ACandS, Inc.public domain
704 F.Supp. 1020 (1989) Bernice E. CAMPBELL, Wife of John E. Campbell, Deceased, and Personal Representative of the Estate of John E. Campbell, Plaintiff, v. ACandS, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CV-87-099-GF-PGH. United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division. January 18, 1989. *1021 T
ELLISON v. CAMPBELLpublic domain
*70 WATT, J. {1 We granted certiorari to. consider a single issue. 1 The first impression question presented is: whether, in a suit for breach of contract in which a party seeks compensation for an expert witness's failure to provide competent litigat
State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbellpublic domain
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2024-KA-0240 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL J’KARI CAMPBELL * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 557-317, SECTION “D” Judge Kimya
Miller v. Campbell Countypublic domain
THOMAS, Justice. The question presented in this appeal is novel to Wyoming, and it is substantially unique in American jurisprudence. Can the collateral source rule be invoked in favor of plaintiffs who are seeking compensation for inverse condemnation? The appellants in this case (homeowners) were ordered to evacuate their residences in a subdivision of Gillette known as Rawhide Village Subdivision. The reason for the eva
Brad Ferrell v. Playfly, LLCpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Record No. 0674-25-2 BRAD FERRELL v. PLAYFLY, LLC Present: Judges Causey, Raphael and Duffan Argued at Lexington, Virginia Opinion Issued June 16, 2026 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE
ELLISON v. CAMPBELLpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:ELLISON v. CAMPBELL OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research Calendar Help <
Reiter v. Reiterpublic domain
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge. Appellant, Frances Reiter (Wife), appeals the trial court’s order modifying its original decree of dissolution of marriage. The order terminated previously ordered maintenance payments of $2,000 per month from Wife’s former spouse, Larry Reiter (Husband). She also appeals the trial court’s order denying her request for attorney’s fees. We affirm. Factual Background
Jennifer R. Wilson-Trattner v. Robert Campbellpublic domain
DeGUILIO, District Judge. In this appeal, the Plaintiff argues that the district court incorrectly granted summary judgment for the defense on three of her claims: a substantive due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a failure to train claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim under Indiana law. Each of these is based on allegations
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00266-CV ___________________________ DALE ROY SLAVEN, Appellant V. BRAD LIVINGSTON, WILLIAM STEPHENS, AND LYNN M. CLARK, Appellees On Appeal from the 30th District Court
Sanders v. Brad Farrah Pontiac Gmc Nissanpublic domain
*********** The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dollar. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Dollar with minor modifications.
in the Matter of A.G.public domain
NO. 07-11-00286-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A ----------------------------------------------------
Williams v. Albemarle Regional Health Servicespublic domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Brad Donovan and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of th
in the Matter of A.G.public domain
NO. 07-11-00286-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 31, 2011 IN THE MATTER OF A.G. FROM THE 99TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2009-763,359; HONORABLE BRAD UNDERWOOD, JUDGE Before CAMP