Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BOYD v. MADISON COUNTY COUNCIL”
Wilson v. Madison County Board of Educationpublic domain
STUART, Justice. This case involves interpretation of certain provisions of the Alabama Teacher Tenure Act, § 6-24-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, as amended by Act No. 2004-566, Ala. Acts 2004. This Court granted the petition for the writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in light of these changes to the statute. Laura Wilson, a tenured teacher, taught physical education and
Madison County Bd. of Educ. v. Wilsonpublic domain
984 So.2d 1153 (2006) MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. Laura WILSON. 2050222. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. August 11, 2006. *1154 Cynthia K. Thompson of Johnston, Moore, Maples & Thompson, Huntsville, for appellant. Stan McDonald, Huntsville; Frederick L. Fohrell and Robert C. Lockwood of Wilmer & Lee, P.
OPINION This is a civil rights case brought under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973,1 and several constitutional provisions. *455The action challenges Tennessee’s 1992 apportionment of its 33 state Senate districts.2 Tennessee’s voting age population is 14.4% black, but in only three of the districts (9.1%)
City of Council Bluffs v. U.S. Dep't of the Interiorpublic domain
STEPHANIE M. ROSE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This lawsuit represents the latest chapter in a long-running dispute over whether the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska (the "Tribe") may conduct Class II gaming on a 4.8-acre tract of land in Carter Lake, Iowa (the "Carter Lake Parcel"). Plaintiffs-the City of Council Bluffs, Iowa, joined by Intervenor-Plaintiffs the State of Nebraska and the State of Iowa-challenge a November 13, 2017
Boyd, Moses v. IL State Police Deptpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2880 MOSES BOYD, JR., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern D
Moses Boyd, Jr. v. Illinois State Policepublic domain
384 F.3d 888 Moses BOYD, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-2880. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 14, 2004. Decided September 30, 2004. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
USCA11 Case: 23-10385 Document: 112-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10385 ____________________ JANUARY LITTLEJOHN, JEFFREY LITTL
AGCS Marine Ins. v. Arlington Countypublic domain
PRESENT: All the Justices AGCS MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, A/K/A ALLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE & SPECIALTY, A/S/O HARRIS TEETER, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 160221 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY June 15, 2017 ARLINGTON COUNTY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY Louise M
Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employeespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed November 20, 2003 Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed November 20, 2003.
Calvin v. Jefferson County Board of Commissionerspublic domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge ■ I. INTRODUCTION Imagine a fictional Florida county — I’ll call it Marshall County — with a total een-*1295sus population of 12,000. Marshall County is run by a board of commissioners comprised of five people, each of whom is elected from a
Town of Woodway v. Snohomish Countypublic domain
Fl LE This opinion was flied for record at&~~~ IRe nctld r-t Carpenter Supr~::~1ne Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TOWN OF WOODWAY and SAVE ) RICHMOND BEACH, INC., a Washington
ACCEPTED 15-24-00118-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS CASE AS MOOT TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Franklin County, Indiana (“Franklin County”) (Filing No. 40). The motion was filed after Plaintiffs Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., Steve Kristoff and Renana Gross (collect
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00156-CV ___________________________ ARLINGTON PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1329; DAVID CROW; SHAWN GRAHAM; JOSEPH MARKHAM; EDWARD MONTAGUE; MATTHEW THRONE; AND ADRIAN ROJAS, A
Briggs v. City of Madisonpublic domain
536 F.Supp. 435 (1982) Marsha BRIGGS, Mary Stubbe, Jean Degurse, Judith Aubey, Sandra L. Baines, Linda M. Brose, Carolyn R. Christian, Geraldine Grothe-Lovett, Garmen Guajardo, Barbara Hanson-Standridge, Frances Honeggar, Marilyn N. Mussallem, Barbara B. Tweedale, A. Anita Anderson, Jean K. Hermanson, Sherry Lee Kennedy, Elinor C. Pinkert, Pauline Smith, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF MADISON, Defendant. No. 78-C-394. <
County of Kankakee v. Pollution Control Boardpublic domain
955 N.E.2d 1 (2009) 396 Ill. App.3d 1000 352 Ill. Dec. 825 COUNTY OF KANKAKEE, Illinois, Edward D. Smith, Kankakee County State's Attorney, Waste Management of Illinois, Inc., and Byron Sandberg, Petitioners-Appellants, v. The ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, The City of Kankakee, Illinois, Town & Country Utilities, Inc., and Kankakee Regional Landfill, LLC, Respondents-Appellees.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 15-0320 444444444444 KING STREET PATRIOTS, CATHERINE ENGELBRECHT, BRYAN ENGELBRECHT, AND DIANE JOSEPHS, PETITIONERS, v. TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; GILBERTO HINOJOSA, SUCCESSOR TO BOYD RICHIE , IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIRMA
Application of the Emoluments Clause to a Member of the President's Council on Bioethicspublic domain
Application of the Emoluments Clause to a Member of the President’s Council on Bioethics A member of the President’s Council on Bioethics does not hold an “Office of Profit or Trust” within the meaning of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. March 9, 2005 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE ASSOCIATE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT You have asked whether a member of the President’s Co