Cases

OPINION & ORDER KARL L. FORESTER, Senior District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court upon the motion [DE # 11] of the plaintiff, Boyd Van Winkle, Jr., for de novo review of the denial of his application for long-term disability benefits under an ERISA-governed benefit plan offered by his employer, Kentucky Utilities, and issued and administered by the defendant, Life Insurance Com

ORDER MAX O. COGBURN JR., District Judge. This matter is before the court upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#24) and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (# 26). After the parties fully briefed the issues, the court heard oral arguments on the motions. Plaintiff Martin McGhee brought this action to recover short-term disability benefits from Defendants, Aetna Life In

MEMORANDUM OPINION ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before this court are two separate cases, civil actions 2:10-cv-02420-*1270AKK (“Boyd”) and 2:10-cv-02421-AKK (“Green”), that involve identical questions of law and fact, and in which the defendants have moved to dismiss. Docs. 12 and 13 in Boyd; docs. 11 and 12 in Green.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge I. Stipulated Facts1 1. This case began as an interpleader action by Prudential Insurance Company of North America. (Tr. 3:13-16). 2. Cormella Boyd had a life insurance policy through prudential’s group insurance plan for Walmart. (Tr. 3:15-16). Cor-mella

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4054 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SANTARIO BOYD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge

667 F.Supp. 279 (1987) LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. Roberta Beasley NAVA and Angelica Nava. Civ. A. No. 82-920-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. June 29, 1987. *280 Francis G. Weller, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff. Marlene M. Krousel, Baton Rouge, La., for defe

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: This case is before us for a second time. It requires us to determine the appropriate standard for review of factual determinations made by plan administrators under ERISA. The plaintiff brought suit for the denial of accidental death benefits under her husband’s ERISA plan. In the first round, the district court applied the then proper standard

Appellee filed suit in the court below with a complaint in code form against appellant seeking recovery on a policy of life insurance upon the life of Craig Winfred Knowles, of which policy she was the beneficiary. The complaint was for $10,000, due under a policy whereby the appellant, on the 18th day of February, 1966, insured the life of Knowles, who died on the 20th day of February, 1968. Demurrer was filed to the complaint and overruled and appellant filed a plea, which plea has

KITCHENS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: 1f 1. As Greg Peters and Mike Williams were attempting to position, Peters’s fishing boat on its trailer, the winch handle recoiled, struck, and seriously injured Williams. Peters, who owned the truck, the trailer, and the boat, had two liability insurance policies covering bodily injury: his truck and trailer were insured by Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (All

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. In 1977 the Massachusetts legislature enacted a statute, Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 175, § 112, which provided that, for certain types of liability insurance, the Commonwealth would adopt a “notice prejudice” rule. This new statutory rule departed from the traditional common law rule which had strictly enforced notice provisions in insurance policies, allowing forfeit

Judge POOLER concurs in part and dissents in part in a separate opinion. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals arise out of the bankruptcy of DBSD North America, Incorporated and its various subsidiaries (together, “DBSD”). The bankruptcy court confirmed a plan of reorganization for DBSD over the objections of the two appellants here, Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint”) and DISH Network

362 F.Supp.2d 660 (2005) Mary Beth BOYD, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, Defendant. No. CIV. 5:03CV118. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina. Statesville Division. March 11, 2005. *661 *662 Daniel S. Johnson, Howard C. Colvard, Jr., Vannoy, Colvard, Triplet

330 S.W.3d 166 (2010) GUESTHOUSE INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. SHONEY'S NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and Sholand, LLC. No. M2008-02567-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville. June 24, 2009.[1] March 18, 2010. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court September 23, 2010.

146 S.W.3d 600 (2004) Clifford Michael JOHNSON v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. February 20, 2004 Session. July 26, 2004. *602 Larry G. Trail and Van A. French, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, for the appellant, Nissan North America, Inc. Joy L. Davis, Franklin, Tennessee,

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter came before the court this date upon hearing on the government’s appeal of release order (DE 35), filed June 23, 2014. Defendant is charged with multiple drug crimes. Defendant appeared before the Honorable Kimberly A. Swank, United States Magistrate Judge, for hearing June 20, 2014, on the government’s motion for pretrial detention. The magistrate judg

Opinion filed August 31, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-13-00249-CV __________ ALLIED NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE BROKERAGE OF TEXAS, L.L.C., Appellant V. DIAMOND PUMP & TRANSPORT, LLC AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellees

660 F.Supp.2d 830 (2009) Maggie KINSLER, Plaintiff, v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. Case No. 3:08-cv-1203. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 21, 2009. Daniel Seth Holliday, Eric L. Buchanan, Eric Buchanan & Associates, PLLC, Chattanooga, TN, for Plaintiff. John M. Scannapieco, Martha L. Boyd, Br

ACCEPTED 12-14-00123-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:39:11 PM

ORDER GRANTING BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR A DECLARATION THAT OLD REPUBLIC IS PRECLUDED FROM USING EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE TO ALTER THE POLICY’S TERMS GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A.’s Motion for Administrative Relief for a Declaration That Old Republic is Precluded From Using Extrinsic Evidence to Alter the Po

Judgment rendered August 11, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,032-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** CRYSTAL BELL