Cases

251 B.R. 213 (2000) In the MATTER OF GREATE BAY HOTEL & CASINO, INC.; GB Holdings, Inc., and GB Property Funding Corporation, Debtors. Nos. 98-10001/JHW, 98-10002, 98-10003. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. July 28, 2000. *214 *215 *216

80 F.Supp.2d 815 (1999) PLANET HOLLYWOOD (REGION IV), INC., a Minnesota corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOLLYWOOD CASINO CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants. No. 96 C 4660. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 3, 1999. *816 *817

963 F.Supp. 395 (1997) TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MIRAGE RESORTS INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-1371. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 1, 1997. *396 Herbert J. Stern, Stephen M. Greenberg, Stern & Greenberg, Roseland, NJ, for Plaintiff. Benjamin Clarke, DiCotii

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Bartle, District Judge. The court has before it the motion of plaintiff Novatek Corporation ("Novatek") for a preliminary injunction to compel defendant Florence Mallet to place in escrow the net proceeds from the pending sale of her home to ensure that the proceeds are available to satisfy any money judgment ultimately entered against her in this action. Novatek originally filed its complaint in the Court of Common

******************************************************* The "officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the "officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corre

DISCUSSION A. Fifth Amendment Due Process Claims The Fifth Amendment provides that "[n]o person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law[.]" U.S. Const. amend. V. "The base requirement of the Due Process Clause is that a person" deprived of a protected interest "be given an opportunity to be heard 'at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.' "

132 Nev., Advance Opinion ill IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GOLDEN ROAD MOTOR INN, INC., A No. 64349 NEVADA CORPORATION D/B/A ATLANTIS CASINO RESORT SPA, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, FILED vs. JUL 2 1 2016

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which BATCHELDER, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 465-72), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendants John M. Griffin, the Estate of Dennis B. Griffin, the Dennis B. Griffin Revocable Trust, and Martom Properties, LLC (“Defendants”), appeal from the judgment entered by the district court on April 26, 201

795 F.Supp.2d 1098 (2011) Edwin Pascua CARAANG and Edna Gorospe Caraang, Plaintiffs, v. PNC MORTGAGE, etc., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 10-00594 LEK-BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. June 20, 2011. *1101 James H. Fosbinder, Ivey Fosbinder Fosbinder LLLC, A Limited Liability Law Company, Wailuku, HI, for Plaintiffs.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert L. Jones, United States Bankruptcy Judge Defendants, CitiGroup Global Markets, Inc. and CitiBank, N.A. (collectively, Citi), seek dismissal of Trustee’s Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 69],. contending that a newly alleged (and late-filed), fraudulent obligation claim cannot relate back to the original complaint, Trustee’s Complaint to Recover Avoidable Tr

83 F.Supp.2d 455 (2000) UNITED STATES of America v. James V. DeLAURENTIS. Criminal No. 99-431. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 27, 2000. Opinion on Denial of Reargument February 10, 2000. *456 *457 Robert J. Cleary, U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, M

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non

649 F.3d 1276 (2011) THERASENSE, INC. (now known as abbott diabetes care, Inc.) and Abbott Laboratories, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, and Nova Biomedical Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Bayer HealthCare LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 2008-1511, 2008-1512, 2008-1513, 2008-1514, 2008-1595. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

765 F.Supp. 1302 (1990) Doris FLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOLLYWOOD TRAVEL AND TOURS, et al., Defendants. No. 5:89 CV 2182. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. September 26, 1990. *1303 Stanley P. Aronson, William Frank Mikesell, Aronson & Waller, Akron, Ohio, Edwin Davila, Ross & Robertson, Canton, Ohio, for

439 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2006) BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. M/V BELLE OF ORLEANS, in rem, and Belle of Orleans, L.L.C., in personam, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 06-0017-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 25, 2006. Order Denying Reconsideration June 23, 2006.

Opinion of the Court By LEVINSON, J. The plaintiffs-appellants/eross-appellees, Mary Zanakis-Pico and Thomas M. Pico (the Picos) appeal from the amended judgment of the first circuit court, the Honorable Gary W.B. Chang presiding, filed on November 4, 1999. The Picos argue that the circuit court erred in: (1) partially granting the motion of the defendant-appellee/cross-appellant Cutter Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Cu

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 41 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GOLDEN ROAD MOTOR INN, INC., A No. 64349 NEVADA CORPORATION D/B/A ATLANTIS CASINO RESORT SPA, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, FILED vs. JUL 2 1 2016 SUMONA ISLAM, AN INDIVIDUAL, firVide4_ .4i At

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 41 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GOLDEN ROAD MOTOR INN, INC., A No. 64349 NEVADA CORPORATION D/B/A ATLANTIS CASINO RESORT SPA, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, FILED vs. JUL 2 1 2016 SUMONA ISLAM, AN INDIVIDUAL, firVide4_ .4i At

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 41 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA GOLDEN ROAD MOTOR INN, INC., A No. 64349 NEVADA CORPORATION D/B/A ATLANTIS CASINO RESORT SPA, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, FILED vs. JUL 2 1 2016 SUMONA ISLAM, AN INDIVIDUAL, firVide4_ .4i At