⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “BOND v. FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, INC.”

Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-02-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE THE TRADE DESK, INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2022-0461-PAF DERIVATIVE LITIGATION ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: April 5, 2024 Date Decided: February 14, 2025 Stephen E. Jenkins, Marie M. Degnan, ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Frank R. Schirripa, Daniel B. Rehn
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023-06-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TESLA MOTORS, INC. § STOCKHOLDER LITIGATION § No. 181, 2022 § § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 12711
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) 2018-0816-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 13, 2020 Date Decided: June 11, 2020 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, Mark Richardson, Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, Dominic Pod
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007-08-16 · Published · cited 120× · 499 F.3d 47; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19471; 2007 WL 2325819
499 F.3d 47 (2007) In re SONUS NETWORKS, INC, Shareholder Derivative Litigation. Michael Pisnoy; Michelle Burke, Derivatively on behalf of Sonus Networks, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Daniel Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hassan M. Ahmed; Stephen J. Nill; Edward T. Anderson; Paul J. Ferri; Paul J. Severino; Sonus Networks, Inc.; Albert A. Notini; J. Michael O'Hara; Edward N. Harris; Paul R. Jones; Rubin Gruber, Defendants-Appellees.
California Supreme Court · 1991-05-06 · Published · cited 73× · 809 P.2d 809; 53 Cal. 3d 863; 281 Cal. Rptr. 34; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3328; 91 Daily Journal DAR 5389; 1991 Cal. LEXIS 1724
53 Cal.3d 863 (1991) 809 P.2d 809 281 Cal. Rptr. 34 JAMES SANDS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MORONGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. S012721. Supreme Court of California. May 6, 1991. *867 COUNSEL Biddle & Hamilton, Christia
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004-06-25 · Published · cited 5× · 854 A.2d 711; 2004 WL 1418154
854 A.2d 711 (2004) COASTAL RECYCLING, INC. v. Richard F. CONNORS,[1] in His Capacity as Finance Director and Purchasing Agent of the Town of Johnston et al. No. 2003-322-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 25, 2004. *712 Thomas Dickerson, Esq., Michael T. Eskey, Esq., for Plaintiff. Louis DeSimone, Jr.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999-04-15 · Published · cited 14× · 45 F. Supp. 2d 469; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5272; 1999 WL 274819
45 F.Supp.2d 469 (1999) LAUREL CAPITAL GROUP, INC., Laurel Savings Bank, Plaintiffs, v. BT FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Laurel Bank, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 97-311J. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. April 15, 1999. *470 *471 *472
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1996-06-21 · Published · cited 8× · 921 P.2d 821; 22 Kan. App. 2d 537; 1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 69
22 Kan. App.2d 537 (1996) 921 P.2d 821 ST. DAVID'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH, Appellee, v. WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., Appellant. No. 73,928. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed June 21, 1996. *538 Margie J. Phelps and Chris R. Davis, of Phelps-Chartered, of Topeka, for appellant. J
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989-03-08 · Published · cited 62× · 554 A.2d 366; 315 Md. 254; 1989 Md. LEXIS 40
ELDRIDGE, Judge. In 1965, the Maryland General Assembly enacted Chapter 399 of the Acts of 1965, then codified as Maryland Code (1957, 1965 Cum.Supp.), Art. 81, § 19(e), and presently codified as Code (1986, 1988 Cum.Supp.), § 8-213 of the Tax-Property Article, which authorized the State to enter into agreements with private country clubs under which the
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 420 Pa. 134; 215 A.2d 864; 25 A.L.R. 3d 283; 1966 Pa. LEXIS 750
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Bell, The Republic of Venezuela* (1) took an appeal, pursuant to the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23 (12 P.S. §672 et seq.), from an Order of the Court below which decided it had jurisdiction of plaintiffs’ action of assumpsit, commenced by foreign attachment, and (2) filed in this Court an application petitioning this Court to issue a writ of mandamus or
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA J.T.F., et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 21-1453 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 71, 72
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-05-19 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NE’KOLE RAWLINGS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 24- 2122 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION N.W. is a student diagnosed wi
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2019-05-29 · Published · cited 4× · 600 B.R. 838
Joseph G. Rosania, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge John D. Rockefeller once said: "A friendship founded on business is better than a business founded on friendship." At issue in this proceeding is whether a debt that stems from two loan transactions is excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023-12-13 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-0118 Court of Appeals Chutich, J. Dissenting, Hudson, C.J. Took no part, Procaccini, J. Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-08-03 · Published · cited 2× · 268 F. Supp. 3d 196
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge This is a case about whose interests the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) serves when it spends money to repair damaged transit infrastructure in the Metrorail system — a proverbial third rail of this region’s politics. It is also, quite literally, a case about Me
United States Tax Court · 2011-06-13 · Published · cited 6× · 136 T.C. 569; 2011 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 30; 136 T.C. No. 28
OPINION Cohen, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined a deficiency of $134,350 in income tax and an accuracy-related penalty of $20,774 with respect to the jointly filed 2006 Federal income tax return of Sang J. Park (petitioner) and Won Kyung O (petitioner wife) and a deficiency of $23,821 in income tax a
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010-10-07 · Published · cited 12× · 5 A.3d 653; 2010 D.C. App. LEXIS 555; 2010 WL 3908009
5 A.3d 653 (2010) William SEARS, et al., Appellants, v. CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Appellees. Nos. 06-CV-1469, 07-CV-23. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 26, 2008. Decided October 7, 2010. *654 David B. Lamb, with whom Laurance J. Ochs, Washington, DC, was on the brief, for app
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-01-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. Civ. Action No. 20-1750 (EGS) THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff John Doe (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Doe”) brings this case against Defendants Roman Catholic Di
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019-01-29 · Published · cited 5× · 434 P.3d 1024
FILED JANUARY 29, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE GLOBAL NEI