Cases

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-26-00110-CR Ex Parte Louis Benjamin Vargas, f/k/a Louis Benjamin Galynsky On appeal from the Municipal Court of Garrett, Ellis County, Texas Judge Chris Macon, presiding Trial Court Cause No. GP 16596-1 CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opi

ORDER Armando Vargas-Torres, a 31-year-old Mexican citizen, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s decision ordering his removal and denying his request for a continuance. Before the Board, Vargas-Torres sought relief from his prior counsel’s ineffective assistance in failing to apply for cancellation of removal. But Vargas-Torres did not follow the required procedural steps

HAZOURI, J. Jodi Benjamin, as personal representative of the estate of her mother Marlene Gagnon (hereinafter “the Estate”), appeals a final judgment entered against the Estate and in favor of Tandem Healthcare, Inc. (hereinafter “Tandem”) after a jury trial. The Estate raises three issues on appeal: 1) that the trial court erred in admitting a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory concerning prescripti

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER HILLMAN, D.J.' Introduction Ramone E. Vargas (“Vargas”), Randy Flambo (“Flambo”) and Gary Civil (“Civil” or “Plaintiff’) filed suit against Spirit Delivery & Distribution Services, Inc. (“Spirit” or “Defendant”) alleging claims for violation of the independent contractor provision of the Massachusetts Wage Act, Mass.Gen.L. ch. 149, § 148 (the “MWA”)

MEMORANDUM ** Raul Vargas-Sancen was convicted of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the § 1326 charge, as well as his sentence. We affirm. 1. The district court properly denied Vargas-Sancen’s motion to dismiss the § 1326 charge. Vargas-Saneen contended that the 1997 deportation order underl

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, ATTANASIO, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kristian J. VARGAS Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

374 August 6, 2025 No. 703 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HECTOR MOISES ESTRADA-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 21CR30739; A178675 Brandon M. Thompson, Judge. Submitted January 24, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief

374 August 6, 2025 No. 703 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HECTOR MOISES ESTRADA-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 21CR30739; A178675 Brandon M. Thompson, Judge. Submitted January 24, 2024. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defe

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1172 MILTON GEOVANNY VARGAS PANCHI; AIDI VERONICA CONDOR LASSO; M.A.V.C.; J.N.V.C., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

Vargas v 1166 LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 00528) Vargas v 1166 LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 00528 Decided on January 27, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

NUMBER 13-18-00225-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARIO VARGAS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 319th District Cou

811 P.2d 868 (1991) 248 Kan. 881 Thomas Robert VARGAS, formerly d/b/a Robert's Body Shop and Sales, and Peoples National Bank, Appellants, v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Chris-Leef General Agency, and Bud Hamm Insurance & Real Estate, Inc., Appellees. No. 65423. Supreme Court of Kansas. May 24, 1991.

POLEN, J. The defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. The defendant argues on appeal that (1) the trial court improperly admitted the defendant’s prior statement to a third party that he would kill the victim if he did not get his money; and (2) the State failed to present sufficient evidence of premeditation so to survive his motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree with the de

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1749 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MAXIMILIANO FÍGARO-BENJAMÍN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

[Cite as State v. Vargas, 2012-Ohio-2767.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97376 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. We must decide whether the community-caretaking doctrine authorizes the police to conduct a warrantless entry and search of a home to check on the welfare of a resident in the absence of the resident’s consent or an objectively reasonable basis to believe that there is an emergency. In this case, a landlord called the police because he had not

WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge. On March 30, 2006, defendant, Humberto Vargas, was indicted by a Jefferson Parish grand jury with aggravated rape (Count I), in violation of LSA-R.S.14:42, and aggravated burglary (Count II), in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:60. Defendant pled not guilty at arraignment. On the trial court’s own motion, a preliminary hearing was held on October 19, 2006, and continued to February 1, 2007.1<

BESOSA, District Judge. *186Before the Court is the United States' motion for an inquiry regarding potential conflicts of interests arising from the source of defendant José Mulero-Vargas ("Mulero")'s attorneys' fees. (Docket No. 142.) The Court referred the United States' motion to Magistrate Judge Marshal D. Morgan. (Docket No. 143.) The magi

KELLUM, Judge. Brandyn Josephe Benjamin, currently an inmate at Holman Correctional Facility on Alabama’s death row, appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P. *429In 2004, Benjamin was convicted of murdering Jimmie Lewis during the course of a first-degree robbery, a murd

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge, concurring. While I fully concur in the majority opinion as to Parts I, II, III, IV-B, Y-A, and V-B, my concurrence as to Parts IV-A and V-C is only as to the result. In part IV-A, the majority places heavy reliance on the Supreme Court’s decision in Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985). In my view, the fac