Cases

Case: 21-1678 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHRIS BELL, BRIAN BONIFANT, ARLYN BRUNET, PHILLIP CETRONE, ANDRE CLARK, MICHAEL COLE, MELITON CORDERO, TERRY DAVIS, WENDY DAVIS, CARMEN DESHEPLO, CHRISTOPHER M. DIAZ, KERMIT DIAZ, DAVID FLORES, ERIC FRIEDMAN, JESUS GAMEZ, GEORGE GRECO, BRENDAN HANDRATTY, GABRIEL HILL, GEORGE HORTON, PHILIP JONES, D

Case: 21-1678 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHRIS BELL, BRIAN BONIFANT, ARLYN BRUNET, PHILLIP CETRONE, ANDRE CLARK, MICHAEL COLE, MELITON CORDERO, TERRY DAVIS, WENDY DAVIS, CARMEN DESHEPLO, CHRISTOPHER M. DIAZ, KERMIT DIAZ, DAVID FLORES, ERIC FRIEDMAN, JESUS GAMEZ, GEORGE GRECO, BRENDAN HANDRATTY, GABRIEL HILL, GEORGE HORTON, PHILIP JONES, D

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-830C Filed: October 21, 2019 ) CHRIS BELL, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC ) 12(b)(1); Failure To State A Claim;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Affirmed.

Affirmed.

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion to dismiss or Transfer [ECF No. 8] and plaintiff's motions to amend her complaint [ECF Nos. 20-21]. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the defendants' motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Yolanda Bell, a former employee of the United States Department of the Interior, filed an employment

VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Michael Bell and Colleen Bell ("Plaintiffs"), married and living in Killingworth, Connecticut, filed this lawsuit against the United States of America, the United States Department of Treasury, and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") (collectively, "Defendants"), seeking the return of money withheld from their income taxes in 2008. Compl. 1, ECF No. 1. The Bells claim that Dr. Bell's

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) THOMAS BELL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Case: 1:16-cv-O1328 (G Deck) v ) Assigned T0 : Unassigned ` ) Assign_ bare ; 6/27/2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’ ) Description; Habeas Corpus/2241 ) Respondent. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application will be granted and the petition will be dismissed.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Class Certification; RCFC 23; Size of the Individual Claims OPINION and ORDER CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge This is an inverse condemnation matter brought by six named plaintiffs against the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (defendant or the government). Plaintiffs seek just compensation under

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge Eddie Bell was convicted by a jury on crack cocaine distribution charges and sentenced to 300 months in custody. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of Bell and three codefendants, but ordered a limited remand to give this.court an opportunity to consider re-sentencing them in the wake of Kimbrough v.