Cases

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-0588/0667-17 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-0588/0667-17 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

949 A.2d 849 (2008) 195 N.J. 418 STATE v. BATES. No. C-831 September Term 2007, 61,870 Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 17, 2008. Petition for Certification. Denied.

OPINION PER CURIAM. Elliot Bates appeals from an order of the District Court that dismissed his amended civil rights complaint with prejudice. The District Court’s decision rests on the faulty premise that Appellees, most of whom had a role in Bates’ involuntary commitment, are entitled to absolute immunity from suit in federal court pursuant to state law. Nonetheless, we will affirm the District Court’s order

OPINION PER CURIAM. Elliot Bates appeals from an order of the District Court that dismissed his amended civil rights complaint with prejudice. The District Court’s decision rests on the faulty premise that Appellees, most of whom had a role in Bates’ involuntary commitment, are entitled to absolute immunity from suit in federal court pursuant to state law. Nonetheless, we will affirm the District Court’s order

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2943-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, December 21, 2015 v. APPELLAT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2943-14T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, December 21, 2015 v. APPELLAT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0630-12T1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, May 5, 2014 v. APPELLATE DIVISION JAMES BUCKNE

[Cite as State v. Read-Bates, 2020-Ohio-3456.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 108848, 108849, v. : 108850, and 108851

Petition for certification denied.

Petition for certification denied.

MAXWELL, J„ for the Court: ¶ 1. Mississippi has a special interest in protecting its law enforcement officers who are acting within the scope of their duties — an interest reflected in our assault statute.1 While simple assault is a misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail, simple assault on a law enforcement officer acting within the scope of his duty is a felony, pun

(2008) ESTATE OF John OLIVA, Plaintiff, v. State of NEW JERSEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-2259 (JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 30, 2008. OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: This employment retaliation suit arises out of the events that transpired over the course of New Jersey State Trooper John O

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JAMES P. O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction This complex securities class action ease comes before the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, on the motion of the lead plaintiff, State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment, to compel discovery against the so-called Sprint defendants, i.e., Sprint Corporation (“Spri

Cupp, J. {¶ 1} In this certified-conflict case and discretionary appeal, we hold that the trial court has the authority to order a prison sentence to be served consecutively to a prison sentence previously imposed on the same offender by another Ohio court. The court of appeals held accordingly, and we affirm. I {¶ 2} Sometime before 2005, the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court senten

Petition for certification denied.

OPINION RODRIGUEZ, Senior District Judge. This matter has come before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 26(c), and Defendants’ Motion for an Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint with Prejudice, or in the alternative, Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel. The Court has considered all papers submitted and any opposition filed herein, and for the