Cases

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties and the motion to govern future proceedings and the response thereto. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case be remanded to the district court for furth

8 A.3d 1206 (2010) John BARNHARDT, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees. No. 10-SP-178. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 29, 2010. Decided November 18, 2010. *1207 Paul D. Hunt, Washington, DC, for appellant. John Barnhardt filed a brief pro se. Richard S. Love, Seni

723 F.Supp.2d 197 (2010) John BARNHARDT, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0624 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 16, 2010. *199 Paul D. Hunt, Rockville, MD, for Plaintiff. James Anthony Towns, Melvin W. Bolden, Jr., Office of the Attorney General for

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN BARNHARDT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 07-0624 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this civil rights action, plaintiff John Barnhardt seeks damages for injuries resulting from his alleged false

(2008) John BARNHARDT, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-0624 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 9, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint or for summary judgment

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN BARNHARDT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1327 (JDB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the District of Columbia’s Amended Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Sum

601 F.Supp.2d 324 (2009) John BARNHARDT, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1327 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 11, 2009. *326 John Barnhardt, Washington, DC, pro se. Paul D. Hunt, Rockville, MD, for Plaintiff. Zuberi Bakari Williams, Office

12 A.3d 1173 (2011) BARNHARDT v. WHITFIELD. No. 09-CV-119. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. January 5, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

954 A.2d 973 (2008) John BARNHARDT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 06-CF-604. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted January 29, 2008. Decided August 7, 2008. *974 Thomas T. Heslep was on the brief, Washington, for appellant. Jeffrey A. Taylor, United States Attorney, and Roy W. McLee

(2008) UNITED STATES of America v. John BARNHARDT, Defendant. Criminal No. 04-0132(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 27, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant John Barnhardt's motion to set aside an administrative forfeiture of $3,89

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JARED FISHMAN, Plaintiff V. Civil Case No. 21-1847 (RJL) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and LIEUTENANT PATRICK LOFTUS, OFFICER MARCK JAEGER, OFFICER JEREMY BRADY, OFFICER MICHAEL TONG, and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER TODARO, of the Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants Nee Nowe Nee Nee Nee Nee re Ne ee ee re ee Nee ee Nee” See” hy MEMORANDUM OPINION March (2 , 2025 [Dkt. ##47, 54] Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENITHIA ALSTON, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-cv-1515 (JMC) v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Marqueese Alston was shot and killed by D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers. Mr. Alsto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES TURPIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-1807 (TJK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In May 2022, Charles Turpin and Regina Jackson sued the District of Columbia and Officer Michael Chen of the Metrop

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CV-552 GEORGE P. FARRIS, APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ALEHEGN MEHARI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v ) Civil Case No. 16-1889 (RJL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JAUNICE ODOM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-cv-864 (TSC) ) DISTRICT OF CO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA J.Q.R., by his parent and next friend NATIA ROGERS Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02477 (CJN) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION J.Q.R., a minor, alleges that he was falsely arrested while attending school at De

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, filed by the defendants, the District of Columbia and five officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICHARD JONES, et al., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-cv-2405 (DLF) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff Richard Jones asserts several claims against the District of Columbia stemming from his alleged overdeten

Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Thompson. Dissenting opinion by Associate Judge Easterly at page 436. , THOMPSON, Associate Judge: This action arose when appellant District of Columbia (“the District”), asserting that it was acting “in its parens patriae capacity and through its Attorney General,” brought suit agains