Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BARNETT v. 3M COMPANY”
Caleb Barnett v. Kwame Raoulpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-3060, 24-3061, 24-3062 & 24-3063 CALEB BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellants. _________________
Caleb Barnett v. Kwame Raoulpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-3060, 24-3061, 24-3062 & 24-3063 CALEB BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellants. _________________
Barnett v. City of Chicagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge. INTRODUCTION A. The Trial Proceedings 1. The trial of this case lasted for 48 trial days commencing on February 28, 1996 and concluding on August 1, 1996.1 There was a lengthy hiatus in the trial between April 4, 1996 and June 25, 1996 necessitated by a serious injury suffer
Luke Brown v. Mine Safety Appliances Companypublic domain
GEE, Circuit Judge: This appeal draws before us a number of cases dismissed by various trial courts for want of subject matter jurisdiction. In each case, the plaintiff was a worker at Avondale Shipyards, Inc., located in Jefferson Parish, south of New Orleans, who claimed damages resulting from silicosis contracted while he worked
State of Michigan v. Morton Salt Companypublic domain
259 F.Supp. 35 (1966) STATE OF MICHIGAN and all Related Cases Pending in the District of Minnesota, Fourth Division, Plaintiffs, v. MORTON SALT COMPANY et al., Defendants. Nos. 4-64-Civ. 423, 4-64-Civ. 422, 4-65-Civ. 1, 4-65-Civ. 197, 4-65-Civ. 388, 4-65-Civ. 398 to 4-65-Civ. 400, 4-65-Civ. 402, 4-66-Civ. 17, 4-66-Civ. 69, and 4-66-Civ. 138. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.</
State of Vermont v. CAYUGA ROCK SALT COMPANYpublic domain
276 F.Supp. 970 (1967) STATE OF VERMONT and State of Maine, Plaintiffs, v. CAYUGA ROCK SALT COMPANY, Inc., Defendant. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, Plaintiff, v. CAYUGA ROCK SALT COMPANY, Inc., Defendant. Civ. Nos. 9-104, 9-105. United States District Court D. Maine, S. D. October 17, 1967. Louis P. Peck, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of Vermont, Montpelier, Vt., G
Stover v. Synagro-WWT, Inc.public domain
The following petitioners, defendants in the trial court, filed separate petitions for a writ of mandamus in this proceeding arising from two actions filed and then consolidated in the Franklin Circuit Court: 3M Company, Inc., Daikin America, Inc., and Dyneon, LLC (case no. 1081246); Toray Fluorofibers America, Inc. (case no. 1081254); and Synagro South, LLC, and Synagro-WWT, Inc. ("Synagro") (case no. 1081265). We have consolidated the petitions for the purpose of writing one opinion
UCP International Co. v. Balsam Brands Inc.public domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS William H. Orrick, United States. District Judge INTRODUCTION Balsam Brands Inc. and Balsam International Unlimited Company (together “Balsam”) move to dismiss the declaratory judgment action filed by UCP International Company Limited and Global United Enterprises Limited (together “UCP”), arguing that there is no valid case or controversy between the pa
American Axle & Manufacturing v. Neapco Holdings LLCpublic domain
Case: 18-1763 Document: 132 Page: 1 Filed: 07/31/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC, NEAPCO DRIVELINES LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2018-1763 ______________________
2023 WI 25 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1582 COMPLETE TITLE: Beatriz Banuelos, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner.
Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.public domain
Case: 23-2349 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 08/13/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2023-2349 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Joseph v. Onyx Industrial Servicespublic domain
J^CLARENCE E. McMANUS, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiff, Severa Joseph, Sr., was allegedly injured on June 25, 2002 while in the course and scope of his employment with Onyx Industrial Services. He alleges he injured his back while lifting a jet in order to hydroblast while at the Shell Chemical Plant in Norco, Louisiana. The alleged accident was witnessed by Dwayne Stran-ton and Ron DiMa
K-Fee System Gmbh v. Nespresso USA, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-2042 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 12/26/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ K-FEE SYSTEM GMBH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NESPRESSO USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-2042 ______________________ Appeal from the United
Valeant Pharmaceuticals v. Mylan Pharmaceuticalspublic domain
Case: 19-2402 Document: 72 Page: 1 Filed: 11/05/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA LLC, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND LTD., DOW PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, INC., KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN INC., Defendan
Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. In this civil action, Plaintiff asserted claims for discrimination and failure to accommodate, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (“ADA”), against Defendant for medically disqualifying him from the position of railroad conductor due to his “uncontrolled” Type I insulin-dependent diabetes. Following a three-day jury tr
Joyner, District Judge Before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 27) and Corrected Memorandum in Support thereof (Doc. No. 31), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 42), Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (Doc. No. 48), and Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc. No. 54). We deny Defendants' Motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND
Mine Safety Appliance Co. v. Holmespublic domain
WALLER, Chief Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. This is a direct appeal from a judgment awarding Huey P. Holmes, plain-tiffiappellee, $875,000 for silicosis-related injuries allegedly caused by a defective respirator sold by the defendant/appellant, Mine Safety Appliances (MSA). We agree with the trial court’s ruling that the complaint was filed within the statute of limitations, and that Holmes was exposed to a ha
Sr. Kate Reid v. Doe Run Resources Corp.public domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Doe Run Resources and its affiliates operated a smelting facility in Peru. The facility’s pollution allegedly injured the plaintiffs. A Doe Run associate, Renco, is currently arbitrating related claims with Peru. The defendants sought both a mandatory and discretionary stay of this case pending the outcome of the arbitration. The district court
Stinnett v. Commonwealthpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Justice NOBLE. Appellant, Lawrence Robert Stinnett, appeals as a matter of right, Ky. Const. § 110, from a judgment of the Warren Circuit Court convicting him of murder and kidnapping. As a result of his convictions, he was sentenced to a single prison term of life without parole.1 Appellant raises the following arguments: (1) that the trial c
State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausaupublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 822 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 823 SYLLABUS Under the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act as enacted in 1983, a cause of ac