Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “BARBARA SUZANNE LOWRIE”
J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. Valdezpublic domain
186 F.3d 1280 (10th Cir. 1999) J.B., a child, by FREDERIC M. HART, his next friend; Y.A., D.A., E.A., F.A., V.C., and C.C., by ELLA JOAN FENOGLIO, their next friend; R.E., C.E., J.E., and E.E., children, by BARBARA E. BERGMAN, their next friend; J.S., a child, by PETER H. JOHNSTONE, his next friend; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs - Appellants,v.J. ALEX VALDEZ, Secretary of the New Mexico Department of
Underwood v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 211317 SIXTH DIVISION December 1, 2023 No. 1-21-1317 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT MICHAEL W. UND
174 P.3d 544 (2004) 2004 OK 64 In the Matter of SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF the OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR the YEAR 2003. No. 4929. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. July 1, 2004. ORDER OF SUSPENSION This matter comes on before this Court for consideration of th
Underwood v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 231132 FIFTH DIVISION February 28, 2025 No. 1-23-1132 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT Appeal from the Circ
Hornish Trust v. King Countypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS E. HORNISH AND SUZANNE No. 16-35486 J. HORNISH JOINT LIVING TRUST; TRACY NEIGHBORS; BARBARA D.C. No. NEIGHBORS; ARUL MENEZES; 2:15-cv-00284- LUCRETIA VANDERWENDE; HERBERT MJP MOORE; ELYNNE MOORE; EUGENE MOREL; ELIZABETH MOREL; LAKE SAMMAMISH 4257 LLC, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants,
378 F.Supp.2d 1139 (2005) In re UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION No. 8:03CV437. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. July 22, 2005. *1140 Barbara C. Frankland, Rex A. Sharp, Gunderson, Sharp Law Firm, Prairie Village, KS, Claire Cordon, T. David Copley, Keller, Rohrback Law Firm, Kelly S. Reese, Roberta N. Ril
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
NICKERSON v. GREEN VALLEY RECREATION, INC.public domain
FILED BY CLERK NOV 30 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO WILLIAM G. NICKERSON and ) 2 CA-CV 2010-0197 REGINA J. NICKERSON, husband ) DEPARTMENT B and wife; LARRY W. AH
Garvin v. American Telephonepublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk
In Re Trasylol Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;
In re Marilyn H.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Nanette Dembitz, J. This proceeding was initiated by the foster parents of 11-year-old Marilyn, to terminate her biological mother’s rights in accordance with the Family Court Act and the Social Services Law, and to transfer her guardianship to them so that they can adopt her. Marilyn has lived with her foster parents under the supervision of a child care agency since she was 12 days old
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420public domain
991 F.2d 1020 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420 Kay N. BROWN; Gilbert Fennema; Minnie G. Fennema; HaroldJ. Lemmon; Marjorie T. Miller; William C. Findt; WilliamG. Brown; Loyette Eby; David Lawrence; Charles W. Manz,As Trustee for the Manz Family Trust; Jules Belkin; TonyArlotti; Rita G. Thye; Richard O. Slutzky; AlysonSlutzky; Judith Alterman; Central Machine & Welding, Inc.;George F. Ro
State of New York v. Sullivanpublic domain
889 F.2d 401 58 USLW 2293 The STATE OF NEW YORK, the City of New York, the New YorkCity Health & Hospitals Corp., Dr. Irving Rust, on behalf ofhimself, his patients and all others similarly situated, Dr.Melvin Padawer, on behalf of himself, his patients, and allothers similarly situated, Medical and Health ResearchAssociation of New York City, Inc., Planned Parenthood ofNew York City, Inc., P
New York v. Sullivanpublic domain
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in Judge Winter’s thorough opinion to affirm because I agree that the regulations promulgated by the Secretary are permissible under Title X, and are not constitutionally infirm. If experience under the regulations proves otherwise, a challenge may later be raised and resolved. I write separately to express two concerns. The first concern is
Texas San Marcos Treatment Center, L.P. D/B/A San Marcos Treatment Center v. Veronica Paytonpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 3887778 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1
ACCEPTED 03-14-00717-CV 3677007 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/7/2015 10:35:57 AM