Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Armando Montano, J. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth herein. Pro se plaintiff commenced this action by the filing of a summons with endorsed complaint on May 30, 2017, against defendant Dr. Moshe A. Glick, a dentist and the sole shareholder of Riverdale Family

Dismissed.

OPINION Justice ROBINSON, for the Court. Patricia Forte and Red Fox Realty, LLC (Red Fox) (the defendants) appeal from a March 12, 2013 final judgment entered in two consolidated Providence County Superior Court actions in favor of Barbara Voccola and Edward R. Voccola, in their capacities as co-executors of the Estate of Edward E. Voccola

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

338 F.Supp.2d 1282 (2004) Roger Lee JONES, Plaintiff, v. EDGUARDO A. CONSUEGRA'S ESTATE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:02-CV-42-J-99HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. September 22, 2004. *1283 Roger Lee Jones, Raiford, FL, pro se, plaintiff. Mark J. Hiers, Asst. Attorney General, Diogenes A

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. This case raises interesting and challenging questions of jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). Having carefully considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Docket Entry # 11], the Court concludes that it should retain jurisdiction over this action. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Docket Entry # 133]. The Court held a hearing on this Motion on June 5, 2013. For the reasons explained below, the Motion for Class Certification is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs in this case were tieket

Opinion BENTON, J. During the pendency of a divorce suit, the parties entered into a property settlement agreement that required them to divide equally their pension and retirement accounts. This case arises from the parties’ failed attempt to agree on a common construction of one provision of the agreement. The wife contends in this appeal that the trial judge erred in fixing her share of her husband’s individua

By the Court, HARDESTY, J.: Appellant/cross-respondent Frederic and Barbara Rosenberg Living Trust (the Trust) purchased a residential lot that adjoins respondent Shahin Malek's residential lot (the Lot), and which also adjoins a golf course. The Lot also includes a small parcel of land (the out-of-bounds parcel), which had previously been an out-of-bounds area between the golf course and the Lot. In this appeal, we must determine

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), entered March 23, 2012, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. CPLR 3215 (c) requires that a plaint

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote, the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge AGEE joined. NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs challenge Virginia Code § 24.2-643(B), the voter identification law enacted as part of “SB 1256.” 2013 Va. Acts ch. 725. They allege that the statutory requirement that voters present photo identification whe

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and injury to property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Markey, J.), entered March 23, 2012, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. CPLR 3215 (c) requires that a plaint

*598 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court are the National Football League’s Motion to Dismiss All Tort Claims in Plaintiffs’ Consolidated First Amended Complaint [Docket Entry # 72] and the Cowboys Defendants’ (Jerry Jones, Blue & Silver, Inc., Dallas Cowboys Football Club, LTD., JWJ Corporat

37 So.3d 665 (2010) Barbara JONES, Natural Mother and Adult Next Friend of Jeramy Juan Jones, a Minor, Appellant, v. LAUREL FAMILY CLINIC, P.A., Division of South Central Regional Medical Center and South Central Regional Medical Center, Appellees. No. 2008-CA-01490-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 5, 2010. Rehearing Denied June 22, 2010.

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: We hold, for the reasons which follow, that a party’s post-trial claim that a jury *1257 verdict is inconsistent does not preserve for appeal the separate and legally distinct claim that the verdict was the result of an unlawful jury compromise. We therefore affirm the zero

McFADDEN, Judge. This appeal is from the denial of a motion to dismiss for improper venue. Because the trial court’s dismissal rests on an erroneous legal theory, we vacate the order and remand the case for further proceedings. Ronald G. Jones II filed a complaint against Eddie L. Long, New Birth Missionary Baptist Church, Inc., Ephren Taylor, Jr., City Capita

SOUD, ADRIAN G., Associate Judge. In his Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Petitioner Joe Sullivan argues that the Florida Department of Corrections unlawfully extended his prison sentence by more than five years when it recalculated his release date after discovering that the gain time as previously afforded Mr. Sullivan was erroneous. We conclude that calculating a net sum of “unforfeited” gain time and applying this

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Blanchard E. Jones, Jr., appeals the trial court's decision denying his motion to suppress and his subsequent conviction for failure to inform, in violation of R.C. 2923.12(B)(1). For the reasons that follow, we vacate his conviction. {¶ 2} In March 2017, Jones was charged with failure to inform, using a weapon w

IRVING, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Carlos Jones appeals his conviction for second-degree murder, alleging three issues: (1) the trial court erred in admitting a video depicting testimonial evidence; (2) the trial court erred in refusing to allow his witness to testify as an expert; and (3) his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. <