⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “B. v. Roosevelt Inn LLC”

District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 2× · 331 F. Supp. 3d 1260
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1271THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Board of Commissioners of the County of Eddy's Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support Thereof, filed November 22, 2016 (Doc. 9)("EC Motion"); (ii) the Motion to Dismiss P
Washington Supreme Court · 2025-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON OCTOBER 30, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON OCTOBER 30, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018-04-30 · Published · cited 3× · 184 A.3d 48; 237 Md. App. 195
Panel: Eyler, Deborah S., Berger, Fader, JJ. Berger, J. *52 *201 This appeal arises from a decision of the Montgomery County Board of Appeals (the "Board") granting an applicati
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013-02-27 · Published · cited 1× · 944 F. Supp. 2d 1267; 2013 WL 1932655; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56223
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This case brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“FLSA”) is before the Court on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint or, Alternatively, Motion to Stay Proceedings (hereinafter referred to as “Motion to Compel Arbitration”) [Doc. 6]. The issue before the Court, whether a c
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-04-18 · Published · cited 2× · 941 F. Supp. 2d 307; 2013 WL 1686635; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55946
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff in this case, B & A Demolition and Removal, Inc. (“B & A”) seeks a declaratory judgment against the Defendant Markel Insurance Company, LLC (“Markel”), affirming that Markel has an obligation to indemnify B & A in a lawsuit presently pending in New York State Supreme Court. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed: 11/17/2015 4:35:15 PM Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk Starr County, Texas Ana Martinez
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 919 F. Supp. 2d 1254; 2013 WL 324025; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11549
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. Roosevelt Watkins (“Watkins”), a Lieutenant in the Division of Fire Suppression (“Suppression Division”) of the Montgomery Fire Department (“MFD”), brings this collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a) (hereinafter “FLSA” or the “Act”), against his employer, the City of Montgomery (the “City”),
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-06-03 · Published · cited 10× · 167 So. 3d 1105; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 1115; 2015 WL 3488404
CARAWAY, J. _|jln this case, the trial court ruled that separate acts by two tortfeasors at different locations combined simultaneously to contaminate a rural water system with a chemical herbicide. The trial court found the owner of the water system and. the user of the herbicide jointly at fault in a class action involving plaintiff customers of the water system whose use of water was interrupted for 8 days. These plaint
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020-04-10 · Published · cited 2× · 955 F.3d 225
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1754 JEFFREY BOUDREAU, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wendy Boudreau, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC., Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
State v. Steelepublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-08-29 · Published · cited 10× · 169 A.3d 797; 176 Conn. App. 1; 2017 WL 3700789; 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 350
ALVORD, J. The defendant, Thomas Steele, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-134 (a) (4), and conspiracy to commit larceny in the third degree in violation of General S
Utah Supreme Court · 2020-10-15 · Published · cited 3× · 477 P.3d 1239; 2020 UT 67
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 67 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROGER B. ARAVE AND KIMBERLY L. ARAVE; JANET SOUTHWICK, TRUSTEE; VENTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellees, v. PINEVIEW WEST WATER COMPANY, Appe
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012-04-26 · Published · cited 2× · 42 A.3d 646; 204 Md. App. 593
42 A.3d 646 (2012) 204 Md. App. 593 Clayton COLKLEY v. STATE of Maryland. Darnell Fields v. State of Maryland. Nos. 1770, September Term, 2010, 1764, September Term, 2010. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 26, 2012. *649 Brian L. Zavin & Brian L. DeLeonardo (Paul B. DeWolfe, Publi
District Court, D. North Dakota · 2009-10-20 · Published · cited 5× · 666 F. Supp. 2d 1073; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105142; 2009 WL 3381545
666 F.Supp.2d 1073 (2009) NOKOTA HORSE CONSERVANCY, INC., Plaintiff, v. David J. BERNHARDT, Nokota Horse Association, Inc., David Robson, Nola Robson, Robert Fjetland, and Deb Fjetland, Defendants. Case No. 1:09-CV-024. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. October 20, 2009. *1075 Donald R. Becker,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2009-09-24 · Published · cited 44× · 661 F. Supp. 2d 249; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88328; 2009 WL 3063082
661 F.Supp.2d 249 (2009) Joy REYES, as Infant Plaintiff by her Mother and Natural Guardian, Ellen Reyes individually, Plaintiffs, v. FAIRFIELD PROPERTIES, David Berger, David Ford, and David Nobile, Defendants. No. 08-CV-0074 (JFB)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 24, 2009. *255 Frederick K. Brewington
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-06-09 · Published · cited 3× · 36 F.4th 1128
USCA11 Case: 20-14044 Date Filed: 06/09/2022 Page: 1 of 53 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14044 ____________________ BRANDI MCKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a Municipal Corp
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016-02-01 · Published · cited 11× · 313 F.R.D. 615; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30304; 2016 WL 836999
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant FedEx Ground Packages System, Ine.’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of the Accident Register Report and Other Accidents, filed November 16, 2015 (Doc. 65)(“Register Motion”). The Court held a hearing on December 22, 2015. The primary issues are whether the Court sho
Indiana Supreme Court · 2024-03-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE FILED Indiana Supreme Court Mar 06 2024, 2:47 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2014-11-13 · Published · cited 8× · 107 A.3d 570; 2014 Del. LEXIS 543; 2014 WL 7011818
STRINE, Chief Justice: I. INTRODUCTION Jose Campos was injured while working for Daisy Construction Company (“Daisy”). While Campos was receiving total disability payments from Daisy, Daisy performed an investigation of his social security number at the request of its workers’ *572 </
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020-12-30 · Published · cited 15× · 984 F.3d 918
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH December 30, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 65× · 46 Cal. 4th 364
MORENO, J., Concurring and Dissenting. “[T]he ‘absolute equality of all’ persons before the law [is] ‘the very foundation principle of our government.’ ” (Varnum v. Brien (Iowa 2009) 763 N.W.2d 862, 877.) In In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 855-856 [76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384] (Mar