Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “B & C Hidden Acres LLC”
06/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 7, 2023 Session HIDDEN LAKE RESORTS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. V. CHARLES Z. MOORE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cheatham County No. 16577 David D. Wolfe, Chancellor No. M
M&B Enterprise, LLC v. Kleinpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE M&B ENTERPRISE, LLC and FIE ) HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) C.A. No.: N23C-10-044 EMD CCLD v.
Expert South Tulsa, LLC v. Cornerstone Creek Partners, LLC (In re Expert South Tulsa, LLC)public domain
OPINION THURMAN, Chief Judge. In this appeal, both the debtor, Expert South Tulsa, LLC (“EST”), and the E.H. Hawes Revocable Trust (the “Trust”)1 challenge the bankruptcy court’s order granting Cornerstone Creek Partners, LLC (“Cornerstone”)’s motion for summary judgment in the appellants’ fraudulent transfer claim against it. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND
In re 9 Houston LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING THE DEBTOR’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO SELL APPROXIMATELY 3.378 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER INTERESTS Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this single asset real estate.ease, a dispute has arisen over wheth
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This case asks us to determine what a United States Marshal (“Marshal”) collects when he auctions property at a public judicial sale. 28 U.S.C. § 1921(c)(1) entitles the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) to a commission of 3 percent of the first $1,000 collected and l’/¿ percent on the excess o
Rivers v. Revington Glen Investments, LLC.public domain
Doyle, Presiding Judge. *440 This case arises from an action filed by Revington Glen Investments, LLC, ("Revington") against William G. Rivers, individually and as sole trustee of the Rivers Family Trust, and other individuals, 1 al
Maverick Constructors, LLCpublic domain
DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. The decision issued on the date below is subject to an ASBCA Protective Order. This version has been approved for public release. ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Maverick Constructors, LLC ) ASBCA No. 61989 ) Under Contract No. W912E
D.C. Sluciak v. Cecil Twp. Bd. of Supers.public domain
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Dennis C. Sluciak, : Appellant : : v. : : Cecil Township Board of Supervisors : : v. : : Crown Castle Towers 09 LLC :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-IA-00140-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI STATE PORT AUTHORITY AT GULFPORT v. YILPORT HOLDING A.S., YILPORT MISSISSIPPI CONTAINER TERMINAL MANAGEMENT LLC D/B/A YILPORT MISSISSIPPI AND YILPORT MISSISSIPPI CONTAINER TERMINAL MANAGEMENT II LLC D/B/A YILPORT GULFPORT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/16/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LISA P. DODSON TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MICHAEL BRANT PETTIS
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Adib C. Rouhana v. Alberto Ramirezpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ADIB C. ROUHANA, No. 08-16-00356-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v.
LeMond v. Yellowstone Development, LLCpublic domain
JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Timothy Blixseth, Overlook Partners, LLC, and 395 Lampe, LLC, appeal an order of the Fifth Judicial District Court granting summary judgment to Greg LeMond. LeMond cross-appeals. Although the parties raise numerous contentions, we restate the dispositive issues as follows: ¶2 1. Whether the District Court erred when it dismissed Blixset
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: RPD Holdings, L.L.C. claims that it purchased a patent license from multiple debtors in bankruptcy sales of their estates. Tech Pharmacy Services argues that RPD does not have rights under the license to Tech Pharm's patented invention. Concluding that the patent license was a rejected executory contract and could not have been transferred by the
ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM
Chapter 7 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Ruling A. Bruce Campbell, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding concerns adjudication of the respective rights of the .holder of a deed of trust, a purported mechanics lienor, and the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee in this bankruptcy estate’s principal asset. The asset in question is this bankruptcy estate’s unsold
Helfrich v. Foor Family Invests., L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Helfrich v. Foor Family Invests., L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-3446.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JAMES HELFRICH, : JUDGES: : Hon. Earle E. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
RSB Vineyards, LLC v. Orsipublic domain
Jenkins, J. *461*1092This is a breach of warranty action in the absence of a warranty. Plaintiff RSB Vineyards, LLC (RSB) purchased a vineyard jointly owned by the four defendants, including a residence that defendants had renovated and
Cherry Knoll, L.L.C. v. HDR Engineering, Incorporapublic domain
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Cherry Knoll, L.L.C., appeals the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of its complaint against Defendants-Appellees, the City of Lakeway, Texas, City Manager Steven Jones, and HDR Engineering, Inc. For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE and REMAND. I. Cherry Knoll alleges the
Apache Corporation v. Apollo Exploration, LLC Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co. And Sellmoco, LLCpublic domain
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0587 ══════════ Apache Corporation, Petitioner, v. Apollo Exploration, LLC; Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co.; and SellmoCo, LLC, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petit
Apache Corporation v. Apollo Exploration, LLC Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co. And Sellmoco, LLCpublic domain
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0587 ══════════ Apache Corporation, Petitioner, v. Apollo Exploration, LLC; Cogent Exploration, Ltd., Co.; and SellmoCo, LLC, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petit