Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Aycock v. Ethicon, Inc.”
Medicines Co. v. Mylan Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In this patent infringement action, The Medicines Company (“TMC”) asserts that Defendants’ proposed generic bivalirudin drug product infringes United States Patent No. 7,582,727 (the “’727 patent”). Specifically, TMC claims that Defendants Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bioniche Pharma USA, LLC (collectively, “Mylan
Nautilus Group, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.public domain
437 F.3d 1376 The NAUTILUS GROUP, INC. (formerly known as Direct Focus, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.The Nautilus Group, Inc. (formerly known as Direct Focus, Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Icon Health and Fitness, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-1577. No. 05-1603. United States Court of Appeals, Federal
Brinegar v. Porterfieldpublic domain
705 S.W.2d 236 (1986) Lorene BRINEGAR, Appellant, v. Janice Williams PORTERFIELD, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter C. Williams, Deceased, Appellee. No. 9314. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. January 7, 1986. *237 Donald B. Friedman, Friedman & Hooper, Texarkana, for appellant. James Haltom, Hubbard, Patton,