⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Awad v. Ryan”

Awad v. Ryanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 231; 205 L. Ed. 2d 86
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-12-22 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 NY Slip Op 07695
Matter of Awad v Fordham Univ. (2020 NY Slip Op 07695) Matter of Awad v Fordham Univ. 2020 NY Slip Op 07695 Decided on December 22, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-12-22 · Published · cited 1× · 2020 NY Slip Op 07695
Matter of Awad v Fordham Univ. (2020 NY Slip Op 07695) Matter of Awad v Fordham Univ. 2020 NY Slip Op 07695 Decided on December 22, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 2× · 358 F. Supp. 2d 146; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2448; 2005 WL 474254
358 F.Supp.2d 146 (2005) Shawn McALLISTER and Kimberly McAllister, Plaintiffs, v. G & S INVESTORS, G & S Port Chester Corp., LLC, Peg/Park Architects, P.C., Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. Farmingdale Maintenance Services, Inc. And Loftus Contracting Corp., Defendants. No. CV 03-3364. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 17, 2005.
Gena v. Mupublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04399
Gena v Mu (2025 NY Slip Op 04399) Gena v Mu 2025 NY Slip Op 04399 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subje
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-03-30 · Published · cited 9× · 203 A.D.3d 1146; 163 N.Y.S.3d 428; 2022 NY Slip Op 02117
Heras v Ming Seng & Assoc., LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 02117) Heras v Ming Seng & Assoc., LLC 2022 NY Slip Op 02117 Decided on March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Repor
District Court, E.D. New York · 2001-03-20 · Published · cited 13× · 138 F. Supp. 2d 310; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3203; 2001 WL 282909
138 F.Supp.2d 310 (2001) Joseph BOLOGNA, individually, and d/b/a U.S.A. Development, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Sears Roebuck & Co., Pro-Tech Construction, Inc., John Varanelli, Lucille Varanelli, Feldman & Rudy, P.C., Brian Rudy, Hoffman Construction Company, Robert Hoffman, Philip Genova, George Loue, Dennis Meehan, Anne Inguanti, James North, Gary Pace, and All Quality Vendor Program Members, the name being fictitious to
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-07-21 · Published · cited 4× · 196 A.D.3d 625; 151 N.Y.S.3d 678; 2021 NY Slip Op 04477
Beaton v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 04477) Beaton v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 04477 Decided on July 21, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
New York Supreme Court · 2006-01-11 · Published · cited 1× · 11 Misc. 3d 679
OPINION OF THE COURT Daniel Palmieri, J. Ordered that this motion by third-party defendant Cornell University (action No. 2, Jachowicz v VerMilyea, Index No. 2635/02) pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (5) and (7) for an order dismissing the complaint prior to answer, or, in the alternative, for conversion of the action to a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and, upon such conversion, dismi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-07-28 · Published · cited 8× · 148 N.Y.S.3d 690; 196 A.D.3d 686; 2021 NY Slip Op 04543
Johnson v Pawling Cent. Sch. Dist. (2021 NY Slip Op 04543) Johnson v Pawling Cent. Sch. Dist. 2021 NY Slip Op 04543 Decided on July 28, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reportin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-24 · Published · cited 3× · 191 A.D.3d 962; 143 N.Y.S.3d 377; 2021 NY Slip Op 08171
Itzkowitz v Valley Natl. Bank Corp. (2021 NY Slip Op 08171) Itzkowitz v Valley Natl. Bank Corp. 2021 NY Slip Op 08171 Decided on February 24, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Re
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-10 · Published · cited 8× · 142 N.Y.S.3d 77; 191 A.D.3d 749; 2021 NY Slip Op 00827
Balagyozyan v Federal Realty Ltd. Partnership (2021 NY Slip Op 00827) Balagyozyan v Federal Realty Ltd. Partnership 2021 NY Slip Op 00827 Decided on February 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by N
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-02-05 · Published · cited 4× · 114 A.D.3d 645; 979 N.Y.S.2d 832
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Norma Palma appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered July 2, 2012, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to compel the plaintiff to accept her untimely answer. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. “To compel the plaintiff to accept an untimely answer as timely, a defendant must provide a reasonable excuse f
Fisher v. Kastenpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 13× · 124 A.D.3d 714; 2 N.Y.S.3d 189
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pfau, J.), dated March 12, 2013, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 114 A.D.3d 645; 979 N.Y.S.2d 832
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Norma Palma appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered July 2, 2012, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to compel the plaintiff to accept her untimely answer. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. “To compel the plaintiff to accept an untimely answer as timely, a defendant must provide a reasonable excuse f
Ohio Supreme Court · 2016-09-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 Ohio 5603; 147 Ohio St. 3d 338; 65 N.E.3d 731
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended that we approve a consent decree proposed by relator, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, and respondents, Robert K. Wallace, Amy M. Wallace, and Tax Compliance Service, L.L.C., a.k.a. Tax Compliance Services. We accept the board’s recommendation and approve the pr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-06-05 · Published · cited 2× · 717 F.3d 733; 2013 WL 4038598; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11439; 537 Fed. Appx. 672
OPINION WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Watters appeals from his conviction for making a false statement and obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1512(c). In a separately filed unpublished disposition we consider most of Watters’s claims. In this opinion we deal only with his claim that the district court gave an erroneous instruction on 18 U.
Anam v. Obamapublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-09-14 · Published · cited 3× · 653 F. Supp. 2d 62; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83645; 2009 WL 2917034
653 F.Supp.2d 62 (2009) Suhail Abdu ANAM, et al., Petitioners, v. Barack H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 04-1194 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 14, 2009. Darold W. Killmer, David A. Lane, Mari Newman, Sara J. Rich, Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP, Denver, CO, David W. Debruin, Jenner & Block LLP, John W. Niel
ANAM v. Obamapublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 653 F. Supp. 2d 18; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123891; 2009 WL 2856527
653 F.Supp.2d 18 (2009) Suhail Abdu ANAM, et al., Petitioners, v. Barack H. OBAMA, et al., Respondents. Civil Action No. 04-1194 (TFH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 28, 2009. Darold W. Killmer, Sara J. Rich, David A. Lane, Mari Newman, Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP, Denver, CO, David W. Debruin, Jenner & Block LLP, Jonathan S. Nee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-08-14 · Published · cited 23× · 900 F.3d 220
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This is a motion for stay pending appeal. We grant the stay. I. Plaintiffs brought a class action against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges,1 Hearing *222Officers, and the Sheriff (collectively, the "County")