Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Avon M. Peterson”
Varney Entertainment Grp. v. Avon Plasticspublic domain
Filed 2/23/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE VARNEY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., G058903 Plaintiff and Respondent. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2017-00958507) v.
In Re Incorporation of Avon Lakepublic domain
88 N.W.2d 784 (1958) In the Matter of the Incorporation of the TOWN OF AVON LAKE. No. 49375. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 11, 1958. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1958. *785 Jones & Rockwell, Des Moines, for petitioners-appellants. James M. Stewart and R. W. Brennan, Des Moines, for intervenor, Avon Beach Inc., appe
Murphy v. M.C. Lint, Inc.public domain
440 F.Supp.2d 990 (2006) Mary Jo MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. M.C. LINT, INC. d/b/a Polk County Heating and Cooling Melvin Lint; and Mark Young, Defendants. No. 4:04CV90364. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 27, 2006. *991 *992 *993 <
City of Guyton v. Barrowpublic domain
Peterson, Justice. **799At the core of the judicial power is the authority and responsibility to interpret legal text. We have many tools that aid us in this task. When we find the text of a statute ambiguous, nearly a century of Georgia case law instructs us to defer to the interpretation of the state agency charged with administering the stat
[Cite as Swan Super Cleaners, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2017-Ohio-8978.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Swan Super Cleaners, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 17AP-185 (C.P.C. No. 16CV 6198)
Simpson v. Statepublic domain
GRIFFIN, J. Donielle Simpson [“Simpson”] appeals the lower court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Simpson was charged and convicted of armed robbery with a firearm and grand theft of a motor vehicle, and was sentenced on December 24, 2002, to life imprisonment as a prison releasee re-offender on the first count and time served on
Healey v. Mantellpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Narouz v. Charter Communications, LLCpublic domain
RYMER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I would hold that a putative class representative who enters into a settlement with the defendant in a class action after class certification has been denied, and voluntarily dismisses all of his substantive claims, thereby loses a sufficient interest to prosecute an appeal from the adverse certification ruling
Bonidy v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Tab Bonidy, who has a concealed-carry permit under Colorado law, sued the United States Postal Service (USPS) challenging 39 C.F.R. § 232.10) (hereinafter “the regulation”), which pro-*1123Mbits the storage and carriage of firearms on USPS property. Bonidy claims the regulation is unconstitutional as applied to him because it violates
Ra Global Services, Inc. v. Avicenna Overseas Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiffs RA Global Services, Inc. (“RA Global”) and George E. Burch III bring this lawsuit alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, and conspiracy. Presently before us is the motion to dismiss of defendants Avicenna Overseas Corp. (“Avicenna”) and Hüseyin Gün (together, “defendants”) on the grounds of res judica
O'neill v. O'neillpublic domain
KERN, Justice. [¶ 1.] James Anthony O’Neill (Tony) requested the circuit court equitably divide the assets of corporations he owns jointly with his brother, Richard Dean O’Neill (Rick). Rick counterclaimed, seeking the enforcement of agreements dividing the corporate land and equipment. Tony appeals the circuit court’s imposition of punitive damages against him, the court’s denial
Canvas & Leather Bag Co., Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
110 F.Supp.2d 974 (2000) CANVAS & LEATHER BAG COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 00-75, Court No. 97-02-00354. United States Court of International Trade. July 5, 2000. *975 Neville, Peterson & Williams (Curtis W. Knauss and John M. Peterson), New York, NY, for plaintiff. David W. Ogden,
Aref v. Holderpublic domain
774 F.Supp.2d 147 (2011) Yassin Muhiddin AREF et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eric HOLDER et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0539 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2011. *152 Alexis Agathocleous, Rachel Meeropol, Shayana Devendra Kadidal, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Nicholas P. Cartier, U.S.
Aref v. Holderpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YASSIN MUHIDDIN AREF et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 10-0539 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 9, 19, 29
Colon v. Irwinpublic domain
732 So.2d 428 (1999) Angel M. COLON, Appellant, v. Michael L. IRWIN, Appellee. No. 98-2351. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 30, 1999. Angel M. Colon, Avon Park, pro se. No appearance for Appellee. GRIFFIN, C.J. Angel M. Colon ["Colon"] appeals the order of the Orange County Circuit Court dismissing his petition for wri
Butler v. Obamapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Brian Butler (“plaintiff’ or “Butler”) commenced this action on November 1, 2010, against defendants United States President Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, and Kathleen Sebelius (collectively “defendants”), alleging various violations of his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19
Ga. Power Co. v. Cazierpublic domain
Blackwell, Justice. *924Amy Cazier and four other consumers of retail electrical service brought this putative class action against Georgia Power Company, asserting that Georgia Power for several years has collected municipal franchise fees from customers in amounts exceeding those approved by the Public Service Commission, and seeking to recov
Tyszka v. Edward McMahon Agencypublic domain
188 F.Supp.2d 186 (2001) Mary TYSZKA, Plaintiff v. EDWARD MCMAHON AGENCY, et al, Defendants No. 3:00-CV-0298(EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 24, 2001. *187 *188 *189 Eugene N. Axelrod, Employment Law Group, Woodbridge, CT, US C
Brown v. Statepublic domain
HARRELL, Judge. As Judge Wilner points out in his dissent (Dissent, op. at 251), I am responsible for the “peculiar setting” here. As he explains, I agree with Part (2) of the Dissent rejecting the *247majority view in Ohler v. United States, 529 U.S. 753, 120 S.Ct. 1851, 146 L.Ed.2d 826 (2000) and instead conclud
In Re Pickeringpublic domain
195 B.R. 759 (1996) In re Gudrun M. PICKERING, a/k/a Goody Pickering, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-11739-13. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. April 29, 1996. *760 Jerrold L. Nye, Billings, MT, for Debtor. Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee, Great Falls, MT. Neal G. Jensen, Asst. U.S. Trustee, Great Falls, MT.