⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Avon M. Peterson”

California Court of Appeal · 2021-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 2/23/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE VARNEY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., G058903 Plaintiff and Respondent. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2017-00958507) v.
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958-03-11 · Published · cited 8× · 88 N.W.2d 784; 249 Iowa 1112; 1958 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 438
88 N.W.2d 784 (1958) In the Matter of the Incorporation of the TOWN OF AVON LAKE. No. 49375. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 11, 1958. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1958. *785 Jones & Rockwell, Des Moines, for petitioners-appellants. James M. Stewart and R. W. Brennan, Des Moines, for intervenor, Avon Beach Inc., appe
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006-07-27 · Published · cited 1× · 440 F. Supp. 2d 990; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51726; 2006 WL 2089777
440 F.Supp.2d 990 (2006) Mary Jo MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. M.C. LINT, INC. d/b/a Polk County Heating and Cooling Melvin Lint; and Mark Young, Defendants. No. 4:04CV90364. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 27, 2006. *991 *992 *993 <
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019-05-20 · Published · cited 47× · 828 S.E.2d 366; 305 Ga. 799
Peterson, Justice. **799At the core of the judicial power is the authority and responsibility to interpret legal text. We have many tools that aid us in this task. When we find the text of a statute ambiguous, nearly a century of Georgia case law instructs us to defer to the interpretation of the state agency charged with administering the stat
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 Ohio 8978; 101 N.E.3d 591
[Cite as Swan Super Cleaners, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2017-Ohio-8978.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Swan Super Cleaners, Inc., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 17AP-185 (C.P.C. No. 16CV 6198)
Simpson v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 895 So. 2d 1210; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2221; 2005 WL 433402
GRIFFIN, J. Donielle Simpson [“Simpson”] appeals the lower court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Simpson was charged and convicted of armed robbery with a firearm and grand theft of a motor vehicle, and was sentenced on December 24, 2002, to life imprisonment as a prison releasee re-offender on the first count and time served on
Healey v. Mantellpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022-11-15 · Published · cited 7× · 216 Conn. App. 514
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-01-15 · Published · cited 64× · 591 F.3d 1261; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1222; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 917; 2010 WL 143700
RYMER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I would hold that a putative class representative who enters into a settlement with the defendant in a class action after class certification has been denied, and voluntarily dismisses all of his substantive claims, thereby loses a sufficient interest to prosecute an appeal from the adverse certification ruling
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-06-26 · Published · cited 57× · 790 F.3d 1121; 2015 WL 3916547
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Tab Bonidy, who has a concealed-carry permit under Colorado law, sued the United States Postal Service (USPS) challenging 39 C.F.R. § 232.10) (hereinafter “the regulation”), which pro-*1123Mbits the storage and carriage of firearms on USPS property. Bonidy claims the regulation is unconstitutional as applied to him because it violates
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-02-01 · Published · cited 3× · 843 F. Supp. 2d 386; 2012 WL 379480
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Plaintiffs RA Global Services, Inc. (“RA Global”) and George E. Burch III bring this lawsuit alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement, and conspiracy. Presently before us is the motion to dismiss of defendants Avicenna Overseas Corp. (“Avicenna”) and Hüseyin Gün (together, “defendants”) on the grounds of res judica
O'neill v. O'neillpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 16× · 2015 SD 15; 876 N.W.2d 486; 2016 SD 15; 2016 S.D. LEXIS 24; 2016 WL 743341
KERN, Justice. [¶ 1.] James Anthony O’Neill (Tony) requested the circuit court equitably divide the assets of corporations he owns jointly with his brother, Richard Dean O’Neill (Rick). Rick counterclaimed, seeking the enforcement of agreements dividing the corporate land and equipment. Tony appeals the circuit court’s imposition of punitive damages against him, the court’s denial
United States Court of International Trade · 2000-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 110 F. Supp. 2d 974; 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 563; 24 C.I.T. 563; 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1592; 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 77
110 F.Supp.2d 974 (2000) CANVAS & LEATHER BAG COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 00-75, Court No. 97-02-00354. United States Court of International Trade. July 5, 2000. *975 Neville, Peterson & Williams (Curtis W. Knauss and John M. Peterson), New York, NY, for plaintiff. David W. Ogden,
Aref v. Holderpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-30 · Published · cited 45× · 774 F. Supp. 2d 147; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33598; 2011 WL 1195813
774 F.Supp.2d 147 (2011) Yassin Muhiddin AREF et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eric HOLDER et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0539 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 30, 2011. *152 Alexis Agathocleous, Rachel Meeropol, Shayana Devendra Kadidal, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Nicholas P. Cartier, U.S.
Aref v. Holderpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YASSIN MUHIDDIN AREF et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 10-0539 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 9, 19, 29
Colon v. Irwinpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-04-30 · Published · cited 11× · 732 So. 2d 428; 1999 WL 252490
732 So.2d 428 (1999) Angel M. COLON, Appellant, v. Michael L. IRWIN, Appellee. No. 98-2351. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. April 30, 1999. Angel M. Colon, Avon Park, pro se. No appearance for Appellee. GRIFFIN, C.J. Angel M. Colon ["Colon"] appeals the order of the Orange County Circuit Court dismissing his petition for wri
Butler v. Obamapublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-09-30 · Published · cited 3× · 814 F. Supp. 2d 230; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112814; 2011 WL 4526079
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Brian Butler (“plaintiff’ or “Butler”) commenced this action on November 1, 2010, against defendants United States President Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, and Kathleen Sebelius (collectively “defendants”), alleging various violations of his constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018-06-18 · Published · cited 7× · 815 S.E.2d 922
Blackwell, Justice. *924Amy Cazier and four other consumers of retail electrical service brought this putative class action against Georgia Power Company, asserting that Georgia Power for several years has collected municipal franchise fees from customers in amounts exceeding those approved by the Public Service Commission, and seeking to recov
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001-09-24 · Published · cited 8× · 188 F. Supp. 2d 186; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22955; 2001 WL 1797528
188 F.Supp.2d 186 (2001) Mary TYSZKA, Plaintiff v. EDWARD MCMAHON AGENCY, et al, Defendants No. 3:00-CV-0298(EBB). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 24, 2001. *187 *188 *189 Eugene N. Axelrod, Employment Law Group, Woodbridge, CT, US C
Brown v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003-02-24 · Published · cited 20× · 817 A.2d 241; 373 Md. 234; 2003 Md. LEXIS 46
HARRELL, Judge. As Judge Wilner points out in his dissent (Dissent, op. at 251), I am responsible for the “peculiar setting” here. As he explains, I agree with Part (2) of the Dissent rejecting the *247majority view in Ohler v. United States, 529 U.S. 753, 120 S.Ct. 1851, 146 L.Ed.2d 826 (2000) and instead conclud
In Re Pickeringpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1996-04-29 · Published · cited 20× · 195 B.R. 759; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 920; 1996 WL 226615
195 B.R. 759 (1996) In re Gudrun M. PICKERING, a/k/a Goody Pickering, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 95-11739-13. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. April 29, 1996. *760 Jerrold L. Nye, Billings, MT, for Debtor. Robert G. Drummond, Chapter 13 Trustee, Great Falls, MT. Neal G. Jensen, Asst. U.S. Trustee, Great Falls, MT.