Cases

ORDER Jerry Jarrett was convicted by a jury of three counts of concealment money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i); one count of laundering more than $10,000 worth of criminally derived property, id § 1957(a); and two counts of structuring financial transactions, 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(1). On appeal he primarily challenges the sufficiency of evidence for his convictions. We affirm. The background of this case i

ORDER Jarrett James sued Darrin Zimmerman, a detective with the City of Middleton Police Department, for illegally seizing his vehicles without a warrant. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Zimmerman acknowledged that he did, in fact, seize James’s cars, but he seized them pursuant to search warrants. Zimmerman moved for summary judgment and attached copies of the search warrants, one authorizing the seizure of a 2000 Lexus and another authorizing

ORDER Jarrett James sued Darrin Zimmerman, a detective with the City of Middleton Police Department, for illegally seizing his vehicles without a warrant. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Zimmerman acknowledged that he did, in fact, seize James’s cars, but he seized them pursuant to search warrants. Zimmerman moved for summary judgment and attached copies of the search warrants, one authorizing the seizure of a 2000 Lexus and another authorizing

729 F.Supp.2d 620 (2010) Kevin CORNWELL et al., Plaintiffs, v. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 3758(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 27, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration August 11, 2010. *621 Bernard M. Gross, Deborah R. Gross, The Law Office of Bernard M. Gross, P.C

714 F.Supp.2d 475 (2010) PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO. INC. et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 10841(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 1, 2010. *478 David R. Stickney, David A. Thorpe, Timothy Alan Delange, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Gross

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. By Decision and Order dated August 11, 2010(“August 2010 Decision”), the Court denied plaintiff Louisiana Municipal Police Employee Retire Systems’ (“LAMPERS”) motion to reconsider the Court’s Decision and Order dated July 27, 2010 (“July 2010 Decision”) dismissing LAMPERS and similarly-situated potential class members from this lawsuit.

Memorandum Opinion and Order LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion of defendants Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Morgan Stanley, David R. Warren, Anthony B. Tufariello, William J. Forsell, and Steven S. Stern (together, “Defendants”) for reconsideration, in light of the Second Circuit’s

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. This securities action is a consolidation of four eases involving claims for violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77i(a)(2), 77o, in connection with defendants’ sale of mortgage pass-through certificates by means of documents that allegedly contained untrue statements and material

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of plaintiffs, entered November 16,1979 in Montgomery County, upon a verdict rendered at Trial Term (Ford, J.). Late in the afternoon of November 30,1972, defendant Denise Morette was driving west on route 890 in Schenectady County. It was snowing, the road conditions were poor and the visibility limited. She lost control of her vehicle and skidded. The car came to rest blocking the curb lane and part of t

382 S.E.2d 36 (1989) CHECKER LEASING, INC., d/b/a Avis Rent-A-Car v. Charles J. SORBELLO. No. 18236. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. June 8, 1989. *37 W. Henry Lawrence IV, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, for Charles J. Sorbello. Jerald E. Jones, Jones, Williams, West & Jones, Clarksburg, for Checker Leas

504 S.E.2d 802 (1998) Anna Mae SHERRILL, Annetta C. White, Linda S. Mintz, Vernette Price, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION a/k/a Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Amoco Oil Company; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; Citgo Petroleum Corporation; Colonial Pipe Line Company; Conoco, Inc. a/k/a Southern Facilities; Crown Central Petroleum Corporation; Exxon Corporation; Marathon Oil Compa

628 N.E.2d 426 (1993) 256 Ill. App.3d 1002 194 Ill.Dec. 929 BENNETT & KAHNWEILER, INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, as Trustee under a Trust Agreement known as Trust No. 42198, and American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, under a Trust Agreement known as Trust No. 42199, Defendants-Appellants.

126 Ill. App.3d 192 (1984) 467 N.E.2d 344 In re MARRIAGE OF LAURA JO KITCHEN, Petitioner-Appellee, and HAROLD LLOYD KITCHEN, Respondent-Appellant. No. 3-83-0679. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed July 27, 1984. *193 Kathy Olivero and Douglas Olivero, both of Louis E. Olivero, of Peru, for ap

DECISION KASTL, Senior Judge: Staff Sergeant Bradley was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of larceny and housebreaking, violations of Articles 121 and 130, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 930. Before us, he raises two contentions: I THE APPELLANT WAS SUBJECTED TO SELECTIVE PROSECUTION IN VIOLATION OF HIS FIFTH AMEND

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

Eldon E. Fallon, U.S. District Court Judge *623Before the Court are two motions to dismiss without prejudice filed by Plaintiffs *624Herman LeBlanc, R. Doc. 569, and Donnie Beasley, R. Doc. 572. The motions are opposed. R. Doc. 579. Plaintiffs have filed a reply. R. Doc. 590. Havin

McNally, J. Plaintiffs bring this action for an injunction prohibiting and restraining defendant from distributing or exhibiting a certain motion picture called “ The Jolson Story ”, and for an accounting by defendant of all profits realized by reason of the exhibition of the picture, plus a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $500,000 as damages which plaintiffs have allegedly sustained. The complain

429 F.Supp. 683 (1977) The MONTANA POWER COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al., Defendants, v. NORTHERN CHEYENNE TRIBE, and Northern Plains Resource Council, Intervenors. No. CV-76-136-BLG. United States District Court, D. Montana, Billings Division. January 27, 1977. Order to Enter Final Judgment March 28

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV