Cases

748 F.Supp.2d 492 (2010) Fred AVERY, et al. v. CHARIOTS FOR HIRE, et al. Civil Action No. DKC 09-2524. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 16, 2010. *494 Denise M. Clark, Law Office of Denise M. Clark PLLC, Washington, DC, for Fred Avery, et al. Ronald W. Taylor, Thomas H. Strong, Venable LLP, Baltimore, M

OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: The Fair Labor Standards Act requires most employers to pay overtime wages to hourly employees. While professional motor carriers are generally exempt from this requirement, a recent Act of Congress waives the exemption for motor carrier employees who, in whole or in part, drive vehicles weighing less than 10,

Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge Before the Court are the Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, both of which were filed on March 31, 2017. See Docket Nos. 47 and 59. The cross-motions for summary judgment have been fully briefed. See Docket Nos. 48, 60, 66, 71, 73 and 74. Also before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike filed on May 12, 2017. Se

Gordon, Robert B., J. Plaintiff Thomas S. Reis has brought a multi-count Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) against defendants Knight’s Airport Limousine Service, Inc. (“Knight’s” or the “Company”) and each of its President and Treasurer. The central allegation of the Complaint is that Knight’s habitually faded to pay due overtime wages to Reis and the putative class of Limousine Drivers he would represent, in violation of M

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 15) and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 33). The Court heard oral argument on July 30, 2013, and took the motion under advisement. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny both motions.

Mark S. Davis, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a *634claim, filed by defendant Josh Enterprises, Inc. ("Defendant") pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Def. Mot., ECF No. 9. Pla

NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS adopting Report and Recommendations re [29] Report and Recommendations. Action on motion: denying [9] Motion to Dismiss. “Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted.” REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (#9) COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge. <

MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Plaintiff Kenneth Fox filed this putative class action against his former employer, Commonwealth Worldwide Chauffeured Transportation of NY, LLC (“Commonwealth”), in 2008.1 Fox worked as a chauffeur for Commonwealth, and alleges that while he was there Commonwealth failed to pay him and other chauffeurs the full amoun

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court InsureOne Independent Insurance Agency, LLC v. Hallberg, 2012 IL App (1st) 092385 Appellate Court INSUREONE INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC; Caption AMERICAN AGENCIES GENERAL AGENCY, INC.; and AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. JAMES P. HALLBERG

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Asset Recovery Contracting, LLC v. Walsh Construction Co. of Illinois, 2012 IL App (1st) 101226 Appellate Court ASSET RECOVERY CONTRACTING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, PALMOLIVE TOWER CONDOMINIUM, LLC, PALMOLIVE BUILDING BASE,

ORDER Max O. Cogburn Jr., United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the court on: 1) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 144); 2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 146); and 3) Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 190). These matters being fully briefed and ripe for review, the court held

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment as to Employment Status [Gray ECF No. 209; Wells ECF No. 113], Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s Consolidated Motion for Summary Judgment [Gray ECF No. 212; Wells ECF No. 122], and Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Objecti

266 F.Supp.2d 748 (2003) Pamela L. McGINNIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-94-30. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. January 21, 2003. *754 David Torchia, Paul Tobias, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiffs. Telin Ozier, Rosslyn, VA, for Defendants.