Cases

383 S.W.2d 791 (1964) The SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. E.L. WILSON and wife, Evelyn Wilson, Defendants in Error. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section. April 23, 1964. Certiorari Denied September 4, 1964. *792 Simmonds, Bowman & Herndon, Johnson City, for plaintiff in error. Tom H. R

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge A Miller County Circuit Court jury convicted African American defendant Shelby Jamal Davis of aggravated robbery and four counts of first-degree battery. The jury also found that Davis used a firearm when committing the batteries. Davis appeals his convictions and the resulting one-hundred-year sentence, raising three points. The first is that the circuit court erred by denying his race-based Batson

453 F.Supp.2d 421 (2006) James WILTZIUS, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF NEW MILFORD, Kathleen Castagnetta, Joanne Chapin, Janice Dobson, Don Bertola, Bill Butler, Patricia Hembrook, Marty Monteiro, Marcella Martin, Valerie Wilson, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-661(JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 18, 2006. *422

207 F.3d 114 (2nd Cir. 2000) KRASAUNDRA WARD, AKILAH BITTLE, DENISE MILLER, YECENIA RIVERA, PHILOMENA COLLINS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.ANNE C. CLARK, JENNIFER SHERARD, and AVERY FITZPATRICK, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.JOYCE THOMAS, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Social Services, Defendant-Appellant,UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES,

83 N.Y.2d 17 (1993) 628 N.E.2d 1316 607 N.Y.S.2d 606 Lawrence C. Longway, Individually and as Supervisor of the Town of Pamelia, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jefferson County Board of Supervisors et al., Defendants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued November 18, 1993. Decided December 16, 1993. Rosen & Ro

339 S.C. 107 (2000) 529 S.E.2d 20 The STATE, Appellant, v. COREY D., a minor under the age of fourteen, Respondent. No. 25077. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard January 4, 2000. Decided March 6, 2000. *110 Attorney General Charles M. Condon, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McInt

BRICKELL, J. The object of the bill is the specific performance of contracts of purchase of real estate, made by the complainant with the defendants. From the pleadings and proofs it appears, that the defendants, Bogan and Webb, jointly owned a tract of land, on which was located a steam saw-mill, and other fixtures, and that they separately made a sale of their respective interests to the complainant. The contract with Bogan was

208 F.3d 885 (10th Cir. 2000) CARDTOONS, L.C., an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff - Appellant,v.MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-5061 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT April 7, 2000 ON REHEARING EN BANC APPEAL FROM THE U

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S AMENDED HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION Deborah J. Saltzman, United States Bankruptcy Judge Elissa Miller, chapter 7 trustee, objects to the amended homestead exemption claimed by the debtor Rosalva Lua. Having considered the papers, the evidentiary record, and arguments of counsel, the court sustains the trustee’s objection based upon the following findings of fa

988 A.2d 1095 (2010) 190 Md. App. 395 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. Zvi GUTTMAN, Trustee. No. 2122, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 2, 2010. *1097 Steven J. Potter (George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, William R. Phelan, Jr., Baltimore City Dept. of Law, on the br

Judge STRAUB dissents in a separate opinion. JACOBS, Circuit Judge: In 1995, Connecticut General Statute § 17b-104 was amended to reduce benefits payable under the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) program for those beneficiaries who also received housing subsidies. See 1995 Conn. Acts 95-351, § 2(d) (Reg.Sess.) (codified at Conn. Gen.Stat. § 17b-104 (1996)). The amendment w

DEFENDANT NAUGHTY DOG, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (filed 06/10/13; Dkt. No. 105) GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. Court hears oral argument. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court’s final ruling. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant Naughty Dog, Inc.’s response to the amended complaint will be due 21 days from

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 12, 2008 Session ANGIE L. GLEAVES v. GARY W. GLEAVES Appeal from the Chancery Court for Wilson County No. 06132 C. K. Smith, Chancellor No. M2007–01820-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 13, 2008 In this divorce action, Wife contends that the trial court erred in orde

Norcott, J. The principal issues in this appeal are whether: (1) the plaintiff, the city of Groton, possesses an exclusive gas franchise pursuant to a 1913 legislative act; and (2) the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction to prevent the defendant, Yankee Gas Services Company, from providing gas service within the plaintiffs franchise area. The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant seeking an injunction to prohibit the de

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 12, 2007 Session MARY ANNE MARCIANTE v. WILLIAM HAROLD PERRY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 32000 Russ Heldman, Chancellor No. M2006-02654-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 26, 2008 This appeal involves the classification and division of marital property after

581 P.2d 31 (1978) MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Homer SMITH, and the Honorable Charles L. Owens, District Judges of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, Respondents. No. 51921. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 27, 1978. Rodney A. Edwards, Jones, Givens, Brett, Gotcher, Doyle & Bogan, Inc., Tulsa, for petitioner.

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Deborah Aderhold’s (“Ader-hold”), in her official capacity as the State Registrar and Director of Vital Records for the Georgia Department of Public Health, and Monica P. Fenton’s (“Fen-ton”), in her official capacity as Director of System Benefits for the Board of Regents of the University S

ORDER NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are Defendants Eric Greitens and State of Missouri’s Motions to Dismiss, [Docs. 18, 20]. For the following - reasons, Defendants’ Motions are granted in part and denied in part. I. Background1 This lawsuit challenges the adequacy of the Missouri State '

818 So.2d 335 (2002) Alvin THOMAS, II v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2000-KA-00310-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 4, 2002. Rehearing Denied June 13, 2002. *338 William C. Stennett, Tupelo, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Dewitt T. Allred, III, attorneys for appellee. <

336 S.W.2d 326 (1960) James W. BRISTER, Appellant, v. ESTATE of C. B. BRUBAKER, and Heirs of C.B. Brubaker, Deceased, Appellees. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section at Jackson. January 27, 1960. Certiorari Denied June 6, 1960. *327 Strauch & Jones, Memphis, for appellant. William W. Parish and W.J. Chiapella