Cases

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00317-CV ___________________________ MAYPHOUS COLLINS AND AKILAH COLLINS, Appellants V. LESHA STRAUSZ AND PLANO COLLISION CENTER, INC. D/B/A AUTONATION COLLISION CENTER PLANO, Appellees On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are: (1) Defendant Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation America, Inc.'s ("MITAC America") motion to dismiss certain claims (MITACA MTD (Dkt. # 54)); and (2) Defendants Aerospace Testing Engineering & Certification, Inc. ("AeroTEC"), Michel Korwin-Szymanowski, Laurus Basson, and Cindy Dornéval's (collectively, "AeroTEC Defe

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge . ■ Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs third amended complaint (“Complaint”) and compel arbitration. Doc, 8. The motion is fully briefed. Docs. 10,14. No party requests oral argument. The Court will grant the motion. I. Background. In February 2004, Plaintiff Guy Pinto was hired by Defendant

Filed 7/30/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE PEJMAN SABERIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, A174549 v. ALATION, INC., (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 24-CIV-03399) Defendant and Respondent.

Filed 3/3/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR ALEXANDER SOROKUNOV, Plaintiff and Appellant, A171964 v. NETAPP, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG19037264) Defendant and Respondent.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00606-CV ARGO GROUP US, INC., Colony Management Services, Inc., Colony Insurance Company, Colony National Insurance Company, Colony Specialty Insurance Company, Colony Agency Services, Inc., and Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.,

593 N.E.2d 522 (1992) 148 Ill.2d 429 170 Ill.Dec. 633 Henry L. BURKE, Appellee, v. 12 ROTHSCHILD'S LIQUOR MART, INC., et al. (The City of Chicago, Appellant). No. 71524. Supreme Court of Illinois. May 21, 1992. *523 Kelly R. Welsh, Corp. Counsel, Chicago (Jean Dobrer, Lawrence Rosen

Filed 5/18/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ELIZABETH CASTELO, B311573 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV28608) v. XCEED FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of

Filed 7/23/21; see concurring opinion CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ANGELINA JOLIE, No. B308958 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. BD646058) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; WILLIAM BRADLEY PITT, Real Party in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDIN

Filed 7/1/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MIGUEL VALENCIA, JR., et B325803 al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Super. Ct. No. BC723902) Respondents, v. ARMANDO MENDOZA et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Co

Opinion HALLER, J. —Stephen Kaplan appeals from a judgment confirming a $30 million arbitration award against him. Although the award does not specify the nature of the damages, the parties agree a substantial portion of the award consists of punitive damages. The arbitrator issued the award after a hearing which Kaplan elected not to attend. We conclude the

Filed 3/21/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMERALD AERO, LLC, D070579 Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00057479- CU-BC-NC)

SEGAL, J. *348*846INTRODUCTION An attorney who had recommended that his clients and his law firm's retirement plan invest in two real estate companies sought to arbitrate claims

Opinion by: Jason Pulliam, Justice INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from the trial court's denial of a motion to compel arbitration and to enforce a class action waiver provision contained within loan documents between the Cash Biz appellants and its customers. The issues on appeal are: (1) whether the Plaintiff borrowing parties' alleged causes of action fall within the scope of the arbitration pro

Filed 1/29/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MARK COHEN et al., B266702 Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants, (Los Angeles County and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BS139842) v. TNP 2008 PARTICIPATING NOTES PROGRAM, LLC, et al., Defendants, Cross-

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00078-CV THE CITY OF LUBBOCK, TEXAS, APPELLANT V. LAZARO WALCK, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 72nd District Court Lubbock County, T

NUMBER 13-12-00103-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG COUNSEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.L.C., Appellant, v. DAVID McQUADE LEIBOWITZ AND DAVID McQUADE LEIBOWITZ, P.C., Appellees. On appeal from the 370th District Co

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 733 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 734 OPINION In this consolidated interlocutory appeal and mandamus proceeding, appellants

964 So.2d 1225 (2007) Anthony ROBINSON v. ALABAMA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION. 1051327. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 23, 2007. *1227 Cinda R. York of Campbell, Waller & Poer, LLC, Birmingham, for appellant. James N. Nolan and Kary Bryant Wolfe of Walston, Wells & Birchall, LLP, Birmingham, for appellee. STUART,

ORDER LAWRENCE 0. ANDERSON, United States Magistrate Judge. This case arises on the Motion of Defendants Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLC; Rick and Sharon Frinkler, husband and wife; and Dawson Employee Benefits, LLC (“Defendants”) to Dismiss Case And/Or Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration. (Doc. 24) Plaintiffs Aurora and Jonathon Coup (“Plaintiffs”) filed their opposition to the Motion to which Defendants r