Cases

OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. In this interlocutory appeal, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC (Pilot Travel) asserts the trial court erred by denying its motion to compel arbitration and for a stay of the trial court proceedings against it. We reverse the trial court’s order denying Pilot Travel’s motion to compel arbitration and for

McClain, J. The real property, the ownership of which is in controversy in this case, belonged at one time in fee simple to Samuel C. Luckey, since deceased, and was disposed of in his will, which covered all of his property, real and personal, as follows: First. I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Caroline M. Luckey, all my estate, both real and personal, in whatever it may consist, or wherever si

RODOWSKY, Judge. Petitioner, Augustus Redditt (Redditt), was convicted on multiple counts of robbery with a deadly weapon and related offenses following a jury trial. At that trial the court would not permit a defense witness to take the stand in order to give proffered evidence of improper motive, or bias, on the part of the principal prosecution witness. The basis for exclusion was a violation of the court’s order sequesteri

SAVOIE, Judge. hOn September 2, 2014, the Defendant, Cody Keith Fontenot a/k/a Cody Fontenot, was charged by bill of information with one count of simple burglary, a violation of La.R.S. 14:62; and one count of theft of a motor vehicle, a violation of La.R.S. 14:67.26. The Defendant pled not guilty to the charges on September 26, 2014. Thereafter, on February 2, 2016, an amended bill of information was filed to specify the va

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court are numerous pre-trial motions filed by six defendants and the government.1 All six defendants have filed motions to suppress evidence seized through physical searches of their homes or homes to which they had a connection; defendant Scurry moves to suppress evidence seized diming a search o

148 Ill. App.3d 163 (1986) 504 N.E.2d 502 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LECURTIS JOHNSON, a/k/a Lee Curtis Johnson, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-631. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed September 29, 1986. *164 *

CHIEF JUSTICE RYAN delivered the opinion of the court: At a bench trial in the circuit court of La Salle County, the parties stipulated that defendant, Gregory Tisler, had possessed less than 30 grams of LSD. This crime constituted a Class 4 felony under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KENNETH DURONN WILSON, ) ) Case No. 20-cv-100 (GMH) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KRISTI NOEM, )

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 527 May 4, 1938. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an action under Lord Campbell's Act for the wrongful death of respondent's intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellants. There are fourteen specifications of negligence in the complaint, but we set out only specificatio

60 F.2d 673 (1932) PORTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 414. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 18, 1932. Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Webb, of New York City (Walter E. Hope, Richard L. Davisson, and Edward N. Perkins, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Erwin N. Griswol

288 U.S. 378 (1933) BURNET, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. BROOKS ET AL., EXECUTORS. No. 496. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 9, 1933. Decided March 13, 1933. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *380 Solicitor General Thacher, with whom Assistant Atto

Mr. Justice Williams delivered tlie principal opinion of the Court. The bill in equity filed in this suit was by taxpayers of the State of Tennessee, as complainants, against the Funding Board of the State, seeking to have declared unconstitutional and void a provision of an act of the general assembly of Tennessee, approved by the governor on February 21, 1913, authorizing the issue and sale of State bonds in