Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Atwell v. Erickson”
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Ronald Schneider appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 We affirm. A jury found Schneider guilty of first degree murder, burglary, and kidnapping. During his separate sanity trial, the
GIBSON, Circuit Judge. The petitioner Gilbert Arizona Utsler, a state prisoner, appeals from a denial of his federal habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for South Dakota. Petitioner was arrested and convicted in a jury trial of first degree robbery on October 4, 1966, and was sentenced
Erickson v. Cass Countypublic domain
Young, J. The plaintiffs, who are 52 in number, united in instituting this action for the purpose of enjoining the county auditor of Cass county from extending upon the tax lists of that county certain assessments against their lands, made by the drain commissioners of that county, to defray the cost of the construction of Argusville drain No. 13, and to enjoin the county commissioners of said county from issuing drainage bonds
Xinsheng Gan v. Penny Schrockpublic domain
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT XINSHENG GAN, ) ) Appellant, ) WD84241 v. ) ) OPINION FILED:
Liberatore, L. v. Monongahela Railway Companypublic domain
OPINION BY OTT, J.: Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company, (collectively "Railroad"), appeal from the judgment of $87,500.00, entered on February 25, 2015, in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, in favor of plaintiff, Larry Liberatore, in an action to recover personal injury damages pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act ("FELA").
Sai v. Transportation Security Administrationpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Sai, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and Privacy Act (“PA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552a. Before the Court is plaintiffs mo
State v. Patelpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Patel, 2013-Ohio-3300.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J.
Merritt v. Peoplepublic domain
Justice ERICKSON dissenting: I agree with the dissent of Justice Vol-lack, but write separately to emphasize my view that the trial court did not err. All limitations on cross-examination do not constitute a violation of a defendant’s constitutional right to confront witnesses testifying against him and are not always reversible error. See Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed
State v. Crowe, 07cac030015 (1-31-2008)public domain
OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Appellant Thomas Crowe, Jr. entered a no contest plea to driving under the influence of alcohol, R.C. 4511.19(B)(3), after the Delaware County Municipal Court overruled his motion to suppress. The court found him guilty, imposed sentence, and stayed the sentence pending appeal. {¶ 2} The following facts were gleaned from the
Santana v. Cook County Board of Reviewpublic domain
700 F.Supp.2d 1023 (2010) Victor SANTANA, Plaintiff, v. COOK COUNTY BOARD OF REVIEW, et al., Defendants. No. 09 C 5027. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 30, 2010. *1026 R. Tamara De Silva, Law Offices of R. Tamara De Silva, Jonathan D. Lubin, Attorney at Law, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.
Hull v. COLORADO BD. OF GOVERNORS OF COLORADOpublic domain
805 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2011) Langston D. HULL, D.V.M., PH.D., Plaintiff, v. COLORADO BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF the COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, as governing body of Colorado State University, Larry Edward Penley, individually, Anthony Frank, PH.D., individually and in his official capacity, Lance Perryman, individually and in his official capacity, Stephen A. Benjamin, DVM, PH.D., individually and in his official capacity, Patrick J. Brennan, PH.D.
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint [Docket No. 136].1 The motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. 1. BACKGROUND2 In 2001, certain members3 of the Program
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
American Legion v. Derwinskipublic domain
827 F.Supp. 805 (1993) The AMERICAN LEGION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendants. VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 90-1808 SSH, 90-1809 SSH. United States District Court, District
Brown v. Cartwrightpublic domain
30. i.2393 I N ChE jUPKhME :OUR1 O THE STATE CF WNTANA F 9 1973 !iD(;wK G. YKOWI\I drld JOSEPHINE I , BROWN, husband and w i f e , p l a i n t i f f s and Respondents, -vs - CLAUUE D. CP*RTWRIGHT e t a 1 ., Defendants and A p p e l l a n t s .
Brown v. Cartwrightpublic domain
MR. JUSTICE CASTLES delivered the Opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the court sitting without a jury. Plaintiffs Brown, husband and wife, brought an action to quiet title to certain ranch property in Jefferson County. Defendants Cartwright, husband and wife, filed a counterclaim to quiet title to the land in themselves; and defen
16 F.Supp.2d 259 (1997) JIM HENSON PRODUCTIONS, INC. Jane Henson, and Albert Gottesman as Executor of the Estate of Jim Henson, Plaintiff, v. JOHN T. BRADY & ASSOCIATES, INC., and Coffee Associates, Inc., Defendants. No. 92 Civ. 5115(LAP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 9, 1997. *260 Carol F. Simkin, Lis
Hesse v. Wagnerpublic domain
475 S.W.2d 55 (1971) Alfred R. HESSE et al., Appellants, v. Elmer W. WAGNER et al., Respondents. No. 55722. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2. December 13, 1971. Motion for Rehearing or for Transfer Denied January 20, 1972. *57 Thomas, Busse, Cullen, Clooney, Weil & King, Donald H. Clooney, S. M. Thom
Zemina v. Solempublic domain
438 F.Supp. 455 (1977) Fred R. ZEMINA, Petitioner, v. Herman SOLEM, as the Duly Appointed, Qualified and Acting Warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent. Civ. No. 76-4090. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, S. D. September 22, 1977. *456 *457 Stuart Tiede, Woods, F