Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT QUAVONTE JAMARI REDDICK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D24-283 April 12, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee Count

1. Under a provision of a will "I give, bequeath and devise to my two sons [naming them], the following property, to wit: My Home Place where I now live, upon condition that the said [named sons] shall take care and support my wife . . and my daughter . . then the above described property descend and belong to the heirs of the said [named sons]" — the named sons were devised a life estate in the home place conditioned upon their taking care of and supporting the wife and daughter of the

This case is one of original jurisdiction in which this Court issued a rule nisi in prohibition to Honorable H. F. Atkinson, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Lora L. Lasseter, joined by her husband, Platt A. Lasseter, in a case then pending in the Circuit Court of Dade County wherein it was alleged that the Circuit Judge, on petition of other defendants, the Lasseters, was assuming jurisdiction to appoint a Receiver to take charge of and wind up the affa

Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court. In this case, after much consideration of and deliberation over the record, we have determined that the verdict and the judgment based on it should not be disturbed by us. The only question in the case, the answer to which seems to us doubtful, goes to the entire liability of the defendant under the facts proven.

Banke, Chief Judge. The appellant filed this wrongful death action against the Medical Center of Georgia and doctors Hugh K. Sealy and Hugh F. Smisson, Jr., to recover for their alleged negligence in providing medical care and treatment to his deceased wife. Specifically, the appellant alleges that while his wife was in the defendants’ care, she “was improperly and negligently administered a form of the drug pennicillan (sic

PER CURIAM In this action for post-conviction relief, the post-conviction court found that petitioner had failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the failure of the sentencing court to inform him of his constitutional rights before pleading no contest to driving while under the influence of intoxicants.. ORS 135.385; Boykin v. Alabama, 395 US 238, 89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274 (1969). Prejudice “inher

321 Ga. 701 FINAL COPY S25A0063. SCOTT v. THE STATE. WARREN, Presiding Justice. Darrell Dexter Scott challenges his 2017 conviction for felony murder for the stomping death of Darrius Ware at Johnson State Prison. Scott contends that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction; that the trial court erred in admitting Ware’s unredacted death certificate and allowing it to go back with the jury, abused its discretion in al

02/20/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 7, 2024 Session SANDI DAWN CUNNINGHAM ET AL. v. BRYAN TRUCK LINE, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. 22-CC-2017-CV-80 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Seni

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT WILLIE ROARK, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) WD86960 ) KC PET PROJECT, ) Filed: December 17, 2024 ) Appellant.

Cite as 2025 Ark. 98 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-41 Opinion Delivered: May 29, 2025 ZACHARY M. OXLEY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE LONOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 43DR-16-744] V. HONORABLE JASON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN OLLAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-1847 (FYP) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs have moved for reconsideration, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), of the Court’s Memora

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.

987 So.2d 948 (2008) Marshall Jerry LYLE v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 2006-KM-02117-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 22, 2008. Rehearing Denied August 21, 2008. *949 John R. McNeal, Jr., Jackson, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by John R. Henry, attorney for appellee. Be

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-KM-02117-SCT MARSHALL JERRY LYLE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/25/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. V. R. COTTEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LEAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN R. McNEAL, JR. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

948 A.2d 335 (2008) 108 Conn.App. 388 STATE of Connecticut v. Philip MITCHELL. No. 27074. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 15, 2008. Decided June 10, 2008. *339 Charles F. Willson, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). James M. Ralls, senior assistan

JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices Fitzgerald, Kilbride and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. Chief Justice Thomas dissented, with opinion, joined by Justices Garman and Karmeier. OPINION Following a bench trial in the circuit court

NO. 4-99-0736 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GAYLA DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 104414. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. JOHN NAYLOR, Appellee. Opinion filed July 24, 2008. JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices Fitzgerald, Kilbride and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion. Chi

625 S.E.2d 23 (2005) 276 Ga. App. 818 WAVERLY HALL BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. et al. v. BRANHAM et al. No. A05A0893. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 15, 2005. Reconsiderations Denied December 13, 2005. *26 Drew, Eckl & Farnham, W. Wray Eckl, Melanie C. Eyre, Atlanta, for appellants