Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Atchison v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma”
250 P.3d 906 (2010) 2011 OK CIV APP 32 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Protestant/Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY and the State of Oklahoma ex rel. the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, Applicants/Appellees. No. 106,649. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Jon Echols , Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 90public domain
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Jon Echols , Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 902024 OK AG 19Decided: 12/30/2024Oklahoma Attorney General Opinions Cite as: 2024 OK AG 19, __ __ ¶0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question: Does a cou
DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYpublic domain
*536 EDMONDSON, J. 1 We assume original jurisdiction on the question whether this Court has original jurisdiction to adjudicate both the merits of the claim or cause of action that the Dutton (or Petitioner) has pled in this Court and the associated remedies he requests. We decline to assume original juri
DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITY OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Research
BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURTpublic domain
COMBS, V.C.J.: RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1 1 Baby F. was one of several siblings the State of Oklahoma sought to take into its emergency custody in an Application to Take Minor Children Into Emergency Custody filed on April 4, 2018. At that time, three-month-old Baby F. had allegedly been diagnosed with several anomalies and genetic issues
BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURTpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:BABY F. v. OKLAHOMA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Legal Resear
SPANE v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYpublic domain
DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge. {1 Plaintiff/Appellant Sharon Spane (Spane) appeals the trial court's Judgment granting the motion for summary judgment of Defendant/Appellee Central Oklahoma Community Action Agency (COCAA) on the basis that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction because Spane failed to comply with the notice provisions of the Governmental Torts Claims Act (GTCA), 51 0.8.20
SPANE v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:SPANE v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Lega
Johansen v. City of Bartlesville, Oklahomapublic domain
862 F.2d 1423 Robert T. JOHANSEN, Kenneth O. Olson, and Delbert Starrett,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The CITY OF BARTLESVILLE, OKLAHOMA, a Municipal Corporation;Arch Robbins, Mayor of the City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma;Robert Kurland, Vice Mayor of the City of Bartlesville,Oklahoma; and Michael Proctor, City Commissioner of theCity of Bartlesville, Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees.andAmerican Stores Properties, Inc. a
HURRAH, Chief Judge. Hidwestern Developments brought this action to quiet its title against the City of Tulsa to a strip of land 60 feet wide crossing a certain quarter section in Tulsa. The complaint contained a second count in reverse condemnation. A claim of requisite amount arising under federal statutes provides the necessary j
Vaughn v. City of Muskogeepublic domain
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge. {1 The City of Muskogee appeals the district court's judgment in this inverse condemnation proceeding finding in favor of Deary and Esther Vaughn and awarding them $1,952,682.00. The Vaughns appeal the district court's denial of their request for prejudgment interest and that part of the judgment granting title to their real property to the City. Because the issue of a condemnatory taking has not b
OSCN Found Document:IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVIL OSCN navigation Home Courts Co
Garrett v. Bank of Oklahoma (In Re Faulk)public domain
281 B.R. 15 (2002) In re Gretchen Ann FAULK, Debtor. Robert D. Garrett, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Bank of Oklahoma, Trustee of the Faulk Joint Revocable Trust; Patricia L. Williams, Trustee of the Faulk Joint Revocable Trust; Gretchen Faulk Litzer, an individual and Trustee of the Thomas Alexander Dodson Irrevocable Trust, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-17327-WV. Adversary No. 01-1375-WV. United States
Flowers v. EZPawn Oklahoma, Inc.public domain
307 F.Supp.2d 1191 (2004) Rochell FLOWERS, an individual on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EZPAWN OKLAHOMA, INC., a Delaware corporation and EZCorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. No. 03-CV-359-K(C). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. February 3, 2004. *1192
Gaither by & Through Chalfin v. City of Tulsapublic domain
[1] The novel issue presented is whether the divorced mother of a deceased minor child may maintain a wrongful death action without joining the natural father or personal representative? Other errors urged on appeal are: the trial court's instructions; admission of incompetent testimony relating to the mother's emotional suffering; admission of "staged" photographs; and failure to reduce the verdict by 40% under Oklahoma's comparative negligence rule. [2] A sudden rain storm cr
LOGAN, Circuit Judge. The City of Moore, Oklahoma appeals the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of the Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe). On appeal the issues are (1) whether the amount in controversy is sufficient to invoke federal jurisdiction, (2) whether the district court should have abstained pending resolution of state law issues in
Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal Corporationpublic domain
McKAY, Chief Judge. The Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma (the “Kaw Housing Authority” or the “Authority”) challenges the order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissing its action because it lacked standing to bring suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1983 (1988) and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, 4
418 P.2d 625 (1966) The ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Eugene MARZUOLA, Defendant in Error. No. 41298. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. September 27, 1966. Rainey, Flynn & Welch, Oklahama City, Loeffler & Allen, Sapulpa, for plaintiff in error. Pat Malloy, Tulsa, Norman M. Iverson, Arkansas City, Kan., f
295 F.3d 1143 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.OKLAHOMA FIXTURE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 01-9516. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 9, 2002. Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, (Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate Gene
MEMORANDUM OPINION DAUGHERTY, District Judge. Plaintiff as carrier sues the Defendant as consignor for freight charges on eleven tank car shipments of oil from Cushing, Oklahoma, to West Frankfort, Illinois. The case has been submitted to the Court on a Stipulation of Facts and briefs. Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Bill of Lading contract on each of said shipments wherein it w