Cases

ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES LAGOA, J. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410 and section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2014), Appellee, Safeco Insurance Company of America (“Safeco”), seeks an award of attorney’s fees — incurred defending against allegedly baseless assertions contained in the Appellant’s Initial Brief — as a

693 S.E.2d 723 (2010) Timothy G. KORNEGAY, Plaintiff, v. ASPEN ASSET GROUP, LLC, C. Steve Clardy, Michael H. Clardy, Carlton S. Clardy, Jr., Rocking B. Farms, LLC, Basic Electric Company, Inc., and Earth Products Company, LLC, Defendants. No. COA09-71. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 1, 2010. *727 Bishop, Capitano &

232 P.3d 222 (2009) Curtis VAGNEUR and Jeffrey Evans, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CITY OF ASPEN, State of Colorado; Kathryn Koch, in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Aspen; Karen Goldman, in her official capacity as Administrative Hearing Officer; Les Holst; Clifford Weiss; and Terry Paulson, Respondents-Appellees. No. 08CA2552. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

JUSTICE MARQUEZ delivered the opinion of the Court. T1 We granted certiorari review to consider whether two citizen-initiated proposed ordinances regarding the design and construction of a state highway entrance to the City of Aspen are administrative in character and therefore outside the scope of the initiative power reserved to the people under article V, sections 1(1) and 1(9) of the Colorado Constitution

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION EDWARD W. NOTTINGHAM, Chief Judge. This is a civil rights case in which Plaintiff Bronwyn Anglin alleges Defendants violated her rights to due process and free speech, as well as her right to be free from unreasonable seizure, by forcibly injecting her with antipsychotic medication while in custody at the Pitkin County Jail. This matter is before the court on “Defendants

Garsh, E. Susan, J. Plaintiff Michael Feldman filed this action against Aspen Technology, Inc. (“Aspen”), Hunter Acquisition Corp., and Mary Cotton alleging securities fraud, common-law fraud, breach of contract, and violation of General Laws Chapter 93A in connection with Aspen’s acquisition of his software business. This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b

633 F.Supp.2d 15 (2009) 380544 CANADA, INC., Wayne Sim, and Salvador Clavé, Plaintiffs, v. ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., David L. McQuillin, Lawrence B. Evans, and Lisa Zappala, Defendants. No. 07 CIV. 1204(JFK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 5, 2009. *18 Bernstein Leibhard, LLP, New York, NY (Eric Chaffin, Roopal P.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS William J. Martinez United States District Judge Plaintiffs Arapahoe Surgery Center, LLC, Cherry Creek Surgery Center, LLC, Hampden Surgery Center, LLC, Kissing Camels Surgery Center, LLC, SurgCenter of Bel Air, LLC, and Westminster Surgery Center, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this action alleging claims under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 et s

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment by defendant United Airlines, Inc. (“United”), seeking dismissal of most of the antitrust claim that plaintiff DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. (“DHL”) has brought against it, on the basis that the challenged portion of the claim was discharged upon confirmation of United’s Chapter 11 plan of reorganizatio

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 84 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 August 24, 2023 DARYL A. HENSEL, Appellant (Respondent), v. S-23-0028 DAPCPA RPO LLC, Appellee (Petitioner). Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County

Kapur v. IMW EMR, LLC, 2020 NCBC 92. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 20 CVS 5753 ANISH KAPUR, Plaintiff, v. IMW EMR, LLC d/b/a EYE CARE ORDER AND OPINION ON LEADERS; ECL GROUP, LLC d/b/a EYE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CARE LEADERS

2021 IL App (2d) 200108 No. 2-20-0108 & 2-20-0109 cons. Opinion filed April 22, 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ TRIUMPH COMMUNITY B

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. I. SUMMARY Before the Court is Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Claims (dkt. no. 27) (“the Motion”). The *1017Court has also reviewed Plaintiff Diamond X Ranch, LLC’s opposition (dkt. no. 31), and Defendant’s reply (dkt. no. 4

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1066-JTL ) HORIZON KINETICS LLC, HORIZON ) KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, ) SOFTVEST ADVISORS,

*165 OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Vahan H. Gureghian, Danielle Gureghi-an, and Charter School Management, Inc. (collectively, the “CSMI Parties”) appeal from the judgment of the District Court affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision to deny the CSMI Parties’ requests

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Debtors’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Creditor’s Motions for Partial Summary Judgment and Dismissal ROBERT D. BERGER, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The question of whether an entity is eligible to be a “debtor” under the Bankruptcy Code seems, at first blush, to be elementary. Either the entity is or it is not, and le

USCA11 Case: 20-14812 Date Filed: 05/05/2022 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14812 ____________________ SA PALM BEACH, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA21 Court of Appeals No. 16CA0249 Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado W.C. No. XX-XXXXXXX Dami Hospitality, LLC, Petitioner, v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State of Colorado and Division of Workers’ Compensation, Respondents. ORDER SET ASIDE AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS Division III

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL