⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Asha N Brown”

Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021-02-22 · Published · cited 10× · 500 P.3d 1075
500 P.3d 1075The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 187 So. 3d 104; 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0921; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 260; 2016 WL 659111
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. | -[This appeal arises from a trial court judgment awarding plaintiffs damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The only issue in this appeal concerns the trial court’s finding that the accident was caused solely by the fault of the defendant, Kevin Fogg. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August
District Court, E.D. New York · 2018-07-12 · Published · cited 11× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 288
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge: Tina Esperanza, Reigge Edward, Asha Asharafan, and Lesly Briggs (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York law against the City of New York (the "City"); New York City Police Department ("NYPD") Officers Nina McKenzie,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2019-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 932 N.W.2d 782
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
In re Jonespublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2015-09-24 · Published · cited 11× · 538 B.R. 844; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3467; 2015 WL 5895439
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MODIFICATION OF PLAN The Honorable Janice D. Loyd, United States Bankruptcy Court Sometimés relatively “small” cases, raise relatively “big issues”. In such cases, given the amounts in controversy, litigants often negotiate mutually agreeable resolu-. tions. This Court has had the identical issue presented in this case arise several times within the past yea
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010-05-26 · Published · cited 7× · 435 B.R. 493; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1626; 53 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 64; 2010 WL 3440856
435 B.R. 493 (2010) In re THE ANTIOCH COMPANY, et al., Debtor. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust, W. Timothy Miller, Trustee, Plaintiff v. Lee Morgan et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 08-35741, 08-35742, 08-35743, 08-35744, 08-35745, 08-35746, 08-35747, 08-35741. Adversary No. 09-3409. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. May 26, 2010
District Court, D. Delaware · 2010-01-29 · Published · cited 4× · 680 F. Supp. 2d 639; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7649; 2010 WL 329882
680 F.Supp.2d 639 (2010) PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. and Progressive DLP Corp., Plaintiff, v. DRIVE TRADEMARK HOLDINGS LP and Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action No. 09-902-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. January 29, 2010. *640 Jeffrey S. Cashdan, Esquire; Michael Gates, Esquire; and Asha
California Court of Appeal · 2015-03-09 · Published · cited 4× · 234 Cal. App. 4th 1360; 184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 809
Opinion GOODMAN, J.* INTRODUCTION In 2011 and 2012, the People of the State of California, acting by and through the City Attorney of the City of Los Angeles (the People), brought civil *1364enforcement actions against more than 80 operators and owners of facilities alleged to be selling and dis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007-04-10 · Published · cited 2× · 39 A.D.3d 271; 833 N.Y.S.2d 78
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered December 5, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied KPMG’s motion insofar as it sought to stay all proceedings brought by, and compel arbitration with, plaintiffs Gary Rosenbach, Susan Rosenbach, Raj Rajaratnam and Asha Pabla Rajaratnam, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Defendant KPMG cannot compel plaintiffs to arbitrate claims arising out of the allegedly f
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 595 F. Supp. 2d 155; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3343; 2009 WL 113475
595 F.Supp.2d 155 (2009) The SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL NAPS, INC., Global Naps New Hampshire, Inc., Global Naps Networks, Inc., Global Naps Realty, Inc. and Ferrous Miner Holdings, Ltd., Defendants. Convergent Networks, Inc. and Frank T. Gangi, Reach and Apply, Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-12052-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-09-12 · Published · cited 0× · 890 F. Supp. 2d 1060; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129699; 2012 WL 3990638
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. This opinion addresses for a second time whether plaintiffs — Bonnie Fish (“Fish”), Christopher Mino (“Mino”), Monica Lee Woosley (“Woosley”), Lynda Hardman (“Hardman”) and Evolve Bank & Trust— filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act (“ERISA”)1 after the
California Court of Appeal · 2016-12-15 · Published · cited 35× · 6 Cal. App. 5th 907; 211 Cal. Rptr. 3d 769; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1091
Filed 12/15/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR SAJID VEERA et al., B270796 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC541146) v. BANANA REPUBLIC, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a jud
In Re: K.M.S.public domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2022-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE No. 81946 GUARDIANSHIP OF: K.M.S., MINOR. KWAME A.S., Appellant, VS. FILED STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; AND ASHA FEB 1 7 2022 COLSON, ELIZAB 3 A. BROWN ' UPREME COURT Res • ondents.
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 14× · 774 F. Supp. 2d 699; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35390; 2011 WL 1204556
774 F.Supp.2d 699 (2011) Thomas MASON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant. Civil No. 09-0220 (NLH)(JS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 31, 2011. *700 John W. Olivo, Jr., John F. Ward, Maureen V. Abbey, Michael J. Zinna, Ward & Olivo, Summit, NJ, on behalf of plaintiffs. Samuel S
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-02-26 · Published · cited 2× · 2021 Ohio 516
[Cite as H&R Properties, L.L.C. v. Fontain, 2021-Ohio-516.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO H&R CINCY PROPERTIES, LLC, : APPEAL NOS. C-190574 C-190575 HARJINDER SANDHU, : C-190583
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-04-29 · Published · cited 4× · 2014 Ohio 1804
[Cite as Hirsi v. Franklin Cty. Dept. Job & Family Servs., 2014-Ohio-1804.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Asha Hirsi, : Appellant-Appellant, : No. 13AP-39 (C.P.C. No. 12CVF03-3355) v. :
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 129 F.4th 1266
Appellate Case: 23-9565 Document: 93-1 Date Filed: 03/04/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 4, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-08-25 · Published · cited 8× · 47 F.4th 354
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 25, 2022 No. 21-50979 Lyle W. Cayce
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2014-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1013 Filed September 17, 2014 SHALONDA GREEN, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F. Staskal, Judge. Shalonda Green appeals from the district court’s denial of her second application for postconvi
District Court, D. Arizona · 2013-02-13 · Published · cited 3× · 934 F. Supp. 2d 1097; 2013 WL 1189687; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20081
*1100ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG, District Judge. Pending before the Court are (1) the Town of Colorado City’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 264); (2) the Cooke Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 266); (3) the City of Hildale, Hildale-Colorado City Utilities, Twin City Power, and Twin City Water Authority’s (collectively, the “H