Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Asbury Automotive Group Inc v. Federal Trade Commission”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CONSUMERS FOR AUTO ) RELIABILITY AND SAFETY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 17-cv-0540 (KBJ)
Williams v. Hilton Group, PLCpublic domain
261 F.Supp.2d 324 (2003) Stuart A. WILLIAMS, an individual, and WSC Investments, LLC, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. HILTON GROUP, PLC, and Ladbrokes International Betting and Gaming, a division of Hilton Group, PLC, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2024. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 12, 2003.
818 A.2d 259 (2003) 149 Md. App. 666 STATE OF MARYLAND COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS v. KAYDON RING & SEAL, INC. No. 118, Sept. Term, 2002. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 3, 2003. *263 Patricia A. Wood, Assistant General Counsel (Glendora C. Hughes, General Counsel, on the brief), Baltimor
Jamie Huber v. Simons Agency Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 22-2483 _____________ JAMIE HUBER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SIMON’S AGENCY, INC., Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the
Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta
Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.public domain
811 A.2d 10 (2002) ETOLL, INC., A Corporation Organized under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. ELIAS/SAVION ADVERTISING, INC., a Corporation Organized under the Laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Philip L. Elias, and Ronnie J. Savion, and Daniel McCarthy, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 14, 2002. Filed November 8, 2002.
Muise v. GPU, INC.public domain
851 A.2d 799 (2004) 371 N.J. Super. 13 Madeline MUISE, individually and as owner and operator of Mediation and Therapy Associates, on behalf of herself and all other individuals and business entities similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GPU, INC., its subsidiaries, agents, servants and/or employees, and/or GPU Energy, its agents, servants, and/or employees, Defendant-Respondent. George J. Tzannetakis, and Paula
250 F.Supp.2d 961 (2003) VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF EVANSTON, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EVANSTON, a municipal corporation, Defendant. No. 00 C 798. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 31, 2003. *963 Mark Robert Sargis, Paul B. O'Flaherty, Jr., Christopher Jason Raistrick, Bellande, Cheely,
130 N.J. 324 (1992) 614 A.2d 124 INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. COMPUTER CURRICULUM CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued May 4, 1992. Decided October 19, 1992. <
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.public domain
663 F.Supp. 1360 (1987) Walter L. REAZIN, M.D.; HCA Health Services of Kansas, Inc., d/b/a Wesley Medical Center; Health Care Plus, Inc.; and New Century Life Insurance Co., Plaintiffs, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. and HMO KANSAS, INC., Additional Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Additional Counterclaim Defendant. No. 85-6027-K
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Turbine Service, Inc.public domain
467 F.Supp. 1257 (1978) TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TURBINE SERVICE, INC., Gonzales Manufacturing and Industrial Machine Works, Inc., and a Certain Turbine Rotor, Casing, Blades, Rings, Housing, and All Assorted Parts Thereto, all of which being from the SS KATRIN, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 75-1825, 75-2719. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana. September
Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. Furmanpublic domain
32 N.J. 199 (1960) 160 A.2d 265 TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CHANNEL LUMBER CO., A CORPORATION, INTERVENING PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DAVID D. FURMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued December 22, 1959. Decided April 4, 1960.
Tuohey ex rel. Bryant v. Chenal Healthcare, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Brenda Tuohey and Malvorn May,1 individually and on behalf of. all residents and estates of .residents who resided at. Chenal Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from July 23, 2010, through the present, commenced this putative class action against the defendants in - the. Circuit Court of Pulaski County on June 23
Mason v. City of Hobokenpublic domain
951 A.2d 1017 (2008) 196 N.J. 51 Elizabeth MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, James Farina, City Clerk of the City of Hoboken, individually and in his professional capacity as City Clerk of the City of Hoboken, Robert Drasheff, individually and in his professional capacity as Business Administrator of the City of Hoboken, Alfred Arezzo, individually and in his professional capacity as Construction Official of
XRI Investment Holdings LLC v. Holifieldpublic domain
EFiled: Sep 13 2022 08:00AM EDT Transaction ID 68091845 Case No. 2021-0619-JTL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE XRI INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
XRI Investment Holdings LLC v. Holifieldpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE XRI INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0619-JTL ) GREGORY A. HOLIFIELD and GH BLUE ) HOLDINGS, LLC, )
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust v. Puerto Ricopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiffs in these two cases seek a declaratory judgment that the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (“Recovery Act”) is unconstitutional. (Civil No. 14-1518, Docket No. 85; Civil No. 14-1569, Docket No. 20.) Before the Court are three motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaints and one cross-motion for summary judgment.
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Nortonpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MUWEKMA OHLONE TRIBE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-1231 (RBW) ) KEN
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Salazarpublic domain
813 F.Supp.2d 170 (2011) MUWEKMA OHLONE TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. Ken SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, et al.,[1] Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-1231 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2011. *172 Colin Cloud Hampson, Sonosky, Chambers, Sachse, Endreson & Perry, LLP, San Diego, C
135 N.J. 53 (1994) 637 A.2d 1261 ATLANTIC CITY CONVENTION CENTER AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SOUTH JERSEY PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC., T/A THE PRESS & SUNDAY PRESS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND TED BERGMAN, DEFENDANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued November 29, 1993. Decided March 23, 1994.