Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-05-00342-CV FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Saul Guerrero, Jr. , Appellants v. Rosanna GARCIA, Arturo Guerrero, Jr., and Maria Del Carmen Boddie , Appellees From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 19, 2018 4 NO. A-1-CA-35910 5 GABRIEL ARTURO RASCON 6 RODRIGUEZ, RAYITO DEL CARMEN 7 GUTIERREZ DE RASCON; JAVIER 8 ORTIZ TARANGO, deceased; LEE 9 HUNT, representative of the estate of 10 JAVIER ORTIZ TARANGO; BERTA 11 EBILA RAMIREZ; LORENZA SUSANA 12 ORTIZ; MARITZA BERENICE ORTIZ 13 RAMIREZ; CARMEN TARANGO CASTRO; 14 CRISTIAN ANTONIO ROMERO GARCIA, 15 deceased;

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 03-2056 & 03-2171 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTURO GARCIA PARRA and MAGDALENA CORREA, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge. After conducting elaborate surveillance, a team of federal, state, and local law enforcement officials nabbed Nazario Varela, Magdalena Correa, Arturo Garcia Parra, and Luis Garcia Parra on cocaine trafficking and possession charges. (In order to keep the two Garcia Parra brothers straight, we will refer to them using their first names.) All four were indict

504 S.W.2d 931 (1974) FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Juan GARCIA, Jr., Appellee. No. 15237. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 23, 1974. *932 Thomas L. Bridges, Porter, Taylor, Gonzalez, Bonniwell & Thompson, Corpus Christi, for appellants. Israel Galindo, Rio Grande City, for appel

OPINION This is a case involving an alleged wrongful repossession of a pickup truck in violation of Article 9.503, Business and Commerce Code, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes. Plaintiff-Appellee Juan Garcia, Jr. brought this suit against Arturo Requenez, Ramirez Ford Sales, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, alleging that on or about August 25, 1971, Plaintiff Garcia bought a new 1972 Ford pickup from Defendant Ramirez Ford Sales, Inc., in Rio Grande City, Texas. In t

HOWARD, Chief Judge. These appeals involve the application of certain provisions of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), see 48 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2241, a statute enacted by Congress in June 2016 to address Puerto Rico’s financial crisis. As relevant here, PROMESA provides for a temporary stay of debt-related litigation against the Puer-to

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00639-CV Rodolfo Pena QUESADA, Appellant v. Arturo BONILLA and Tara Bonilla,

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

V99704.aa1; City of Alamo v. Espinosa NUMBER 13-99-704-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ____________________________________________________________________ CITY OF ALAMO AND ITS EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND ALL THOSE ACTING IN

NO. 12-22-00237-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN RE: CENTRAL MUTUAL § INSURANCE COMPANY, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING RELATOR § MEMORANDUM OPINION In this or

ACCEPTED 13-15-00409-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/20/2015 5:44:3

ACCEPTED 13-15-00409-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/20/2015 3:46:0

*1133 ORDER On consideration of the Motion to Clarify the Court’s Opinion Issued on August 27, 1991, of the Defendants-Appellants, and the response thereto of the Plaintiffs-Ap-pellees, the court finds that its August 27, 1991, opinion should be modified. The motion to clarify advised the court of an error in th

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-24-00352-CV ———————————— Juan Luis Mora, Individually and as Dependant Administrator of the Estate of Arturo Mora Reyes, Deceased, Perla Rodriguez, as Next of Friend of P.A.M., A.W.M., and P.V.M., all

OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. In the underlying litigation, Leticia Be-navides sued Shirley Hale Mathis, As Temporary Guardian of the Estate of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., for tortious interference with a contract and for money had and received. Mathis moved for both a traditional and no-evidence summary judgment on both claims. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of

Nearly ten years ago, we observed that asbestos litigation had reached maturity. In re Ethyl Corp.,975 S.W.2d 606, 610 (Tex. 1998). Even mature claims evolve, however, and courts have continued to struggle with the appropriate parameters for lawsuits alleging asbestos-related injuries.1 While science has confirmed the *Page 766

754 F.Supp.2d 840 (2010) Keith TAYLOR, et al. v. TESCO CORPORATION (US), et al. Civil Action No. 09-3404. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. November 3, 2010. *842 Laurence Edward Best, Peter Stephan Koeppel, Best Koeppel Traylor, New Orleans, LA, for Keith Taylor, et al. Patricia A. Krebs, Andrew J. Quackenbos,

OPINION In a trial to a jury for deceptive trade practices, violations of the Vehicle Installment Sale Act (Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-7.01 et seq. (Vernon 1987)), and personal injuries, Walter Elizondo obtained a judgment against appellant for $20,796. By nine points of error, appellant complains that the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction and that no evidence or insufficient evidence supports liabili

Office of the Director New Mexico 08:13:29 2022.02.15 Compilation '00'07- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMSC-006 Filing Date: November 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-37489 AMADO CHAVEZ, RAMONA HERNANDEZ, TODD LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of EDGAR CHAVE