⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Artist Publishing Group, LLC v. Cavaliers Operating Company, LLC”

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-08-29 · Published · cited 11× · 264 F. Supp. 3d 1148
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0 Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Doc. 272) and Memorandum Opinion and Order (Doc. 274), filed May 9, 2017 (Doc. 280)(“Motion for Reconsideration”). The Court held hearings on April 26, 2
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 27× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on
District Court, D. Montana · 2012-02-08 · Published · cited 1× · 850 F. Supp. 2d 1172; 101 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1947; 2012 WL 405631; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15827
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Montana Silversmiths brings this action for copyright infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets against Taylor Brands and two of its former employees, Chris Roth and Marcia Eaton, who now work for Taylor Brands. M
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-09-23 · Published · cited 25× · 659 F. Supp. 2d 547; 93 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1183; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87652; 2009 WL 3030195
659 F.Supp.2d 547 (2009) Zev LEWINSON, as Assignee of SwordPen.com, Inc., Plaintiff, v. HENRY HOLT AND COMPANY, LLC, Karen J. Katz, and John and/or Jane Does 1 to 10, Defendants. Case No. 07-CV-10955 (KMK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 23, 2009. *552 Zev Lewinson, Teaneck, NJ, pro se. Robert D. Ba
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2008-07-01 · Published · cited 6× · 564 F. Supp. 2d 946; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52306; 2008 WL 2673833
564 F.Supp.2d 946 (2008) SUN MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. KDSM, LLC and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 4:06-cv-106. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 1, 2008. *948 Trent C. Keisling, Meredith K. Lowry, Stephen Douglas Schrantz, John M. Scott, Keisling Pieper & Scott PLC, Fa
District Court, S.D. New York · 1996-10-09 · Published · cited 21× · 943 F. Supp. 311; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14998; 1996 WL 583376
943 F.Supp. 311 (1996) COSMETECH INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DER KWEI ENTERPRISE AND CO., LTD. and Wormser Corp., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 9993 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 9, 1996. *312 *313 Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, New York City (Stephen G. Rine
District Court, E.D. California · 2009-10-30 · Published · cited 4× · 670 F. Supp. 2d 1069; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101251; 2009 WL 3736146
670 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) Roger McINTOSH, Plaintiff, v. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, et al, Defendants. and Related Cross-Action. Case No. CV F 07-1080 LJO GSA. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 30, 2009. *1077 James J. Braze, Jeffrey A. Travis, Borton, Petrini, LLP, Bakersfield, CA,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-03-31 · Published · cited 124× · 360 F.3d 644
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Neil Gaiman brought suit under the Copyright Act against Todd McFarlane and corporations controlled by him that we can ignore, seeking a declaration that he (Gaiman) owns copyrights jointly with McFarlane in certain comic-book characters. Merchant v. Levy, 92 F.3d 51 (2d Cir.1996); Zuill v. Shanahan, 80 F.3d 1366 (9th
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-08-14 · Published · cited 6× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 1123; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107450; 2015 WL 4885221
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO PLAINTIFF’S FEDERAL COPYRIGHT CLAIM AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIM; DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT DATES AS MOOT MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE World, Inc., Sidney Kimmel Entertainment, LLC,- Filmdistrict Pictures, LLC, Lakeshore Entertainment Co
District Court, C.D. California · 2015-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 137 F. Supp. 3d 1173; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101291; 2015 WL 5897507
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [35] DOLLY M- GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 15, 2014, Plaintiff Judy Stabile filed a Complaint against Defendants Paul Smith Limited, Paul Smith Los Angeles, LLC, The Rug Company Limited, and the Rug Company, LTD. (CA) alleging (1) cop
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-10-26 · Published · cited 56× · 271 F.R.D. 429; 2010 WL 4615547
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge. There is a pervasive risk that electronic information will be lost during the course of litigation, whether through inadvertence, intentional spoliation, or failure to institute and properly implement a litigation hold. Consequently, the law provides a range of sanctions and remedies that may be imposed when the destructio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-11-01 · Published · cited 11× · 85 F.4th 931
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KYLE HANAGAMI, an individual, No. 22-55890 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02063- v. SVW-MRW EPIC GAMES, INC., a North Carolina corporation; DOES, 1 through 10, OPINION inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court
MELCHIZEDEK v. Holtpublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 2011-06-03 · Published · cited 2× · 792 F. Supp. 2d 1042; 100 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1100; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59663; 2011 WL 2175036
792 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2011) Drunvalo MELCHIZEDEK, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Ronald L. HOLT and Lyssa Royal Holt, a married couple; and Flower of Life Research, LLC, a Nevada corporation, Defendants. No. CV 09-1815-PHX-JAT. United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 3, 2011. *1045 Carey Brandt Anthony, Lance Christopher Venab
Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CERCACOR LABORATORIES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23C-05-200 PRW ) CCLD METRONOM HEALTH, INC., and ) OLAV BERGHEIM, )
Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CERCACOR LABORATORIES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N23C-05-200 PRW ) CCLD METRONOM HEALTH, INC., and ) OLAV BERGHEIM, )
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 88× · 883 F.3d 1111
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JACOBUS RENTMEESTER, No. 15-35509 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-00113-MO NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JACOBUS RENTMEESTER, No. 15-35509 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-00113-MO NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-03-01 · Published · cited 5× · 488 F. Supp. 2d 702; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15153; 2007 WL 684047
488 F.Supp.2d 702 (2007) Eron BUCCIARELLI-TIEGER, an individual; et al., Plaintiffs, v. VICTORY RECORDS, INC., an Illinois corporation; et al., Defendants. No. 06 C 4258. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 1, 2007. *703 *704 *705<
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-07-13 · Published · cited 3× · 39 F.4th 1297
Appellate Case: 19-3210 Document: 010110710106 Date Filed: 07/13/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 13, 2022
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012-01-13 · Published · cited 14× · 57 A.3d 928; 2012 WL 120196; 2012 Del. Ch. LEXIS 11
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction Defendant Morgan Joseph Holdings, Inc. is an investment bank in which the petitioners held Series A Preferred Stock. The petitioners bought their preferred stock when Morgan Joseph was founded in 2001, helping to provide the initial funding for the company. Until late 2010, Morgan Joseph had outstanding two classes of preferred stock (Se