Cases

692 F.2d 748 Horstmyerv.Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips 82-1043 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. 9/27/82 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 11, 1980, which was in favor of the defendants, upon a jury verdict. The notice of appeal dated May 2, 1978 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the amended judgment. Amended judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Trial Term did not err in failing to charge the doctrine of "last clear cha

In re Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc. and National Diversified Corp., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *1097Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Caddo. 409 So.2d 1274. Denied.

676 F.2d 686 Horstmyerv.Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc. 81-2069, 81-2070 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 2/12/82 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

409 So.2d 1274 (1982) John C. BRAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR TREACHER'S FISH & CHIPS, INC., et al., Defendant-Appellant. No. 14749. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. January 25, 1982. Writ Denied March 19, 1982. *1275 Peatross & Greer by Charles Peatrose, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appelle

519 F.Supp. 739 (1981) ARTHUR TREACHER'S FISH & CHIPS, INC. v. A&B MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. MRS. PAUL'S KITCHENS, INC. Civ. A. No. 80-3378. No. MDL 467. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. August 3, 1981. *740 John M. Elliott, John F. Stoviak, Edward F. Mannino, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Levy,

OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question whether the district court erred in awarding Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc. (Arthur Treacher’s) past and future royalties on its motion for a preliminary injunction against its franchisee, A&B Management Corp. (A&B). I. A&B was incorporated in 1974 for the purpose

386 A.2d 1162 (1978) In re ARTHUR TREACHER'S FISH & CHIPS OF FT. LAUDERDALE, INC. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted April 13, 1978. Decided May 10, 1978. Craig B. Smith of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, for petitioner. Robert K. Payson and Michael D. Goldman of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, and William Lo

OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge. On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the district court properly adjudged Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc. (Arthur Treacher’s) and its corporate parent, Mrs. Paul’s Kitchens, Inc. (Mrs. Paul’s), 1 in contempt of a March 26, 1981

272 N.W.2d 262 (1978) Orville F. ZEPP, Relator, v. ARTHUR TREACHER FISH & CHIPS, INC., Respondent, Department of Employment Services, Respondent. No. 48475. Supreme Court of Minnesota. November 9, 1978. *263 Robert W. Herr, White Bear Lake, for relator. Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett and W. Todd Haggart, M

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT Greenblott, J. P. Under a master franchise agreement, dated August 27, 1970, petitioner, Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc., granted A.E.K. Enterprises, Inc. (A.E.K.) permission to operate five Arthur Treacher’s Fish and Chips restaurants. On December 19, 1976 petitioner and A.E.K. entered into a written agreement whereby petitioner agreed to purchase the restaurants of A.E.K. a

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HANNUM, District Judge. I. Preliminary Statement This Memorandum will address several discovery related problems which have recently arisen in this litigation. Specifically, the following motions are pending: (1) Motion Of Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc. And Mrs. Paul’s Kitchens To Compel Answers To Deposition

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HANNUM, District Judge. I. Preliminary Statement This Memorandum and the Order which follows it will dispose of the following pending motions: *403(1) Motion to Amend Plaintiff’s Complaint, Civil Action No. 80-3625, Docket Entry No. 9 (2) Defe

535 F.2d 1254 Dimitri's Golden Star, Inc.v.Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc. No. 75-1880 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 4/7/76 N.D.Ohio AFFIRMED

537 F.Supp. 311 (1982) In re ARTHUR TREACHER'S FRANCHISEE LITIGATION. MDL No. 467. Civ. A. No. 82-0043. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 6, 1982. John M. Elliott, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish & Kauffman, Philadelphia, Pa., for Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc. and Mrs. Paul's. *312 Franklin Poul, Wolf

*591MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HANNUM, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Inc. (ATFC), has moved the Court to certify a defendant class in Civil Action No. 81-1085. The class action would be limited to Count II of the complaint in which plaintiff seeks the following relief:

Lowe, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Our opinion of the Court of Appeals’ opinion in the first appeal of Arthur Treacher’s v. Chillum Ter., 272 Md. 720 is obviously not shared by appellants. The “uncommon issue of when a lease is not a lease” was the liminal question answered in that case, in order to reach the more specific issue of what measure of damages should be used upon breach of a leas

689 F.2d 1137 1982-2 Trade Cases 64,904 In re ARTHUR TREACHER'S FRANCHISEE LITIGATION.ARTHUR TREACHER'S FISH & CHIPS, INC.v.A & B MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONv.MRS. PAUL'S KITCHENS, INC.(Additional Defendant on the Counterclaims)Appeal of A & B MANAGEMENT CORPORATION.In re ARTHUR TREACHER'S FRANCHISEE LITIGATION.ARTHUR TREACHER'S FISH & CHIPS, INC.v.A & B MANAG