Cases

195 A.2d 63 (1963) Mary Griffin BARTON v. Winifred M. BECK'S ESTATE. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. November 20, 1963. *64 Richard B. Sanborn, Augusta, for plaintiff. Arthur A. Peabody, Portland, for defendant. Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, SULLIVAN, SIDDALL and MARDEN, JJ. WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The question which this Court is called upon to determine is whether this action, which was brought by creditors of the St. Louis Joint' Stock Land Bank (now in process of liquidation) to enforce the double liability imposed by § 812, Title 12 U.S.C.A., upon the stockholders of the Bank, is barred as to William D. Gibbs by virtue of Sec. 860 and Sec. 862, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1929, Mo.St.Ann.

217 F.2d 763 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 15013. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. November 19, 1954. Rehearing Denied January 10, 1955. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Hubert H. Margolies, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Wa

63 F.2d 553 (1933) EDWARD P. ALLISON CO., Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 9450. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. February 16, 1933. Rehearing Denied March 22, 1933. *554 J. Sydney Salkey, of St. Louis, Mo. (William R. Gilbert, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for petitioner. Erwin

HOPKINS, District Judge. This is an action at law (jury waived) against the collector of internal revenue to recover $51,824.38, alleged to have been erroneously collected from the plaintiffs (a partnership) as excess profits tax for the calendar year 1917. ‘ The plaintiffs’ chief contention is that the running of the applicable statute of limitations had operated to bar collection previous to the time the amount involved wa

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 349 The value of railroad property depends to a very large extent upon the business done by the railroad corporation. The business done by the corporation, and the net financial result of such business depend in turn to a very large extent upon the condition of the roadbed and the rolling stock and upon the available

176 Cal.App.2d 458 (1959) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. LEONARD EWING SCOTT, Appellant. Crim. No. 6272. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three. Dec. 21, 1959. Morris Lavine for Appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, William B. McKesson, District Attorney (Los Angeles), Manley J. Bowler, Chief

145 B.R. 412 (1990) In re RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Resorts International Financing, Inc. Griffin Resorts Holding, Inc., Griffin Resorts, Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 89-10119, 89-10120, 89-10461 and 89-10462. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. August 16, 1990. *413 *414

28 F.2d 177 (1928) KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RY. CO. et al. v. CENTRAL UNION TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK et al.[*] No. 6457. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. July 7, 1928. *178 *179 Samuel W. Sawyer, of Kansas City, Mo. (Edward J. White, of St. Louis, Mo., N. H. Loomis, of Omaha, Neb.

ELLIOTT, J. This is an appeal from an order of the district court approving and confirming the action of the receivers of the Millers & Manufacturers *100Insurance Company in disallowing the claim of Parsons, Rich & Co. against the insolvent corporation. The facts upon which the claim against the company arose are practically agreed upon by the par- ' ties. Th

The following opinion was filed April 19, 1904: *207I. Motions to Dismiss Appeals. Maeshall, J. Many questions are presented for consideration on tlie motions to dismiss. Perhaps most of them •could well he jfassed without even a mention thereof. It is certain, as will he seen, that those upon which the motions must

STATEMENT. WOODSON, J. This is an original proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted in this court on March 29, 1905, by the Attorney-General, to forfeit the charter of the Waters-Pierce Oil Company, which will hereafter be called the Waters-Pierce Company, and to revoke the licenses to do business in this State of the Standard Oil Company of Indiana, which will hereafter be called the Indiana