Cases

TATEL, Circuit Judge: Appellant alleges that his employer, the United States Customs and Border Protection Agency, repeatedly rejected him for promotions in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The district court granted summary judgment for the agency. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse i

NO. 12-04-00243-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS<

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 28, 2010 Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice 140087

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff Arthur Gilbert (“plaintiff’ or “Gilbert”) is suing Janet Napolitano in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security. A former employee of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP” or “Customs”), Gilbert alleges that CBP discriminated and retaliated against him by denying his

760 F.Supp.2d 21 (2011) Arthur GILBERT, Plaintiff, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Defendant. Civil Case No. 05-2128(RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 12, 2011. *22 Leizer Z. Goldsmith, The Goldsmith Law Firm, LLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Michelle Lo, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for

MEMORANDUM ** Freddie Fletcher, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging on constitutional grounds a final judgment rendered against him by the California Supreme Court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s jurisdictional dismissal based on the

Opinion RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J. Article VI, section 17 of the California Constitution (Section 17) states, in pertinent part: “A judge of a court of record may not practice law and during the term for which the judge was selected is ineligible for public employment or public office other than judicial employment or judicial office . . . .”

AMBRO, Circuit Judge This appeal presents two issues of first impression in our Court concerning the Internal Revenue Service's assessment of civil penalties for violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5314 and its implementing regulations, which require certain persons annually to file a Report of F

MEMORANDUM ** Jarvis Gilbert, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. After reviewing the briefs and the record, *419and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons given in Judge Henderson’s thorough opinion of May 22

230 P.3d 1218 (2009) Christian GILBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur JULIAN, Assistant Chief Hearing Officer; Andrew Stone, Hearing Officer; and Roxy Huber, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Division of Motor Vehicles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09CA0020. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. October 1, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 19,

[J-32-2015] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., EAKIN, BAER, TODD, STEVENS, JJ. RALPH GILBERT, GLORIA GILBERT, : No. 121 MAP 2014 MICHELLE TORGERSON, EDWIN : TORGERSON, MELDA BITTORF, : Appeal from the Order of the Superior BEVERLY COX, WILLIAM COX, : Court dated April 15, 2014, at No. 119 MDA KIMBERLY MILES, CLEA FOCKLER, : 2013, reversing and reman

Opinion JOHNSON, J In the published portion of this case we hold a lawyer represented by other members of his law firm is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees where the representation involved the lawyer’s personal interests and not those of the firm. Facts and Proceedings Below This case arises out of the landlord-tenant relationship between appellant Arth

72 F.3d 139 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNI

48 F.3d 1233NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNITED STATES of America, Pl

Thomas A. UnverfeRth, Judge. {¶ 1} The parties in this matter have resolved all but two issues between themselves, and an entry has been sent to the court reflecting that agreement. A subsidiary point controverted in it is to be resolved having to do with the calculation of child support. The parentage of plaintiff had earlier been established as part of the pleadings. {¶ 2} The issues remaining are a dispu

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW MILLER, Judge. Appellant was convicted by a jury of injury to a child. V.T.C.A. Penal Code § 22.04. The jury assessed punishment at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections and a $10,000 fine. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction in an unpublished opinion. Gilbert v. State, No. 05-85-01380-CR (Tex.App.

THORNTON, J. This is an appeal by petitioner from a denial of post-conviction relief. The petition alleges violations of state and federal constitutional rights occurring during his criminal trial and seeks to set aside his conviction and have the case remanded for retrial. ORS 138.520. Petitioner was convicted of murder by a unanimous verdict of an 11-person jury. During trial one member of the original 12-per

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Gerald K. Smith, in his capacity as Plan Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Boston Chicken, Inc. and various related entities (the Trustee) filed an action alleging a variety of claims. Later, the Trustee filed motions seeking district court approval of settlements reached with certain of the *995defendants and requesting bar orders

PER CURIAM. Caroline Gilbert, the claimant and a former assistant manager for the employer-ap-pellee, Publix Supermarkets, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims denying compensability for the injuries she sustained in an automobile accident which occurred at approximately 3:45 a.m. on January 26, 1995, en route from her home to her place of employment at Publix. We affirm on all issues, but write briefly to

MEMORANDUM** Gary Ayres appeals pro se the district court’s directed verdict, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 50, for the defendant on the issue of damages in Ayres’ employment discrimination action alleging that he was demoted and constructively discharged due to age discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. Earnhardt’s Dodge cross-appea