Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Arthur Agustin Reyes”
People v. Reyespublic domain
178 Cal.App.4th 1183 (2009) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CUAUHTEMOC AGUSTIN REYES et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. G038778. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. October 30, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *1185 William J. Kopeny & Associates
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
United States v. Pineda-Arrellanopublic domain
492 F.3d 624 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Agustin PINEDA-ARRELLANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-41156 Conference Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 17, 2007. Julia Bowen Stern, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def., H. Michael Sokolow, Houston, TX, fo
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Golnoy Barge Co. v. M/T SHINOUSSApublic domain
841 F.Supp. 783 (1993) GOLNOY BARGE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. M/T SHINOUSSA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. H-90-2414, 90-2476, 90-2488 and 91-180. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 15, 1993. *784 Thomas Gibbs Gee, Baker & Botts, pro se. Ronald L. White, Brown Sims Wise & Whi
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Fernando Cordero-Garcia v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FERNANDO CORDERO-GARCIA, AKA No. 19-72779 Fernando Cordero, Petitioner, Agency No. A014-690-577 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the
*1081 SNEED, Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review of a final order of deportation issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The Board upheld the denial of petitioner’s application for an extension of his stay in the United States and of his request for asylum in this country. The Board also r
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
City of Dallas v. Arredondopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of