Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Art Tobias v. City of Los Angeles”
Art Tobias v. Michael Arteagapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ART TOBIAS, No. 18-56360 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-01076- DSF-AS MICHAEL ARTEAGA; JEFF CORTINA; J. MOTTO; JULIAN PERE, Defendants-Appellants.
S.M. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.public domain
Filed 9/16/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE S.M., a Minor, etc., B253983 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC477194) v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
S.M. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.public domain
Filed 10/7/15 Unmodified opinion attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE S.M., a Minor, etc., B253983 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC477194)
Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company Incpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge, with whom McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges, join. The plaintiffs in these cases are foreign agricultural workers who labored on banana plantations in Central and South America from the 1960
Tobias Chavez v. Dole Food Company Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 13-4144 __________ TOBIAS BERMUDEZ CHAVEZ, et al., v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., et al. (D. Del. No. 1-12-cv-00697) ____ JULIO ABREGO ABREGO, et al., v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., et al. (D. Del. No. 1-12-cv-00698)
Kahan v. City of Richmondpublic domain
Margulies, J. *727Tobias Kahan purchased property in Richmond, California at a foreclosure sale. Shortly before the sale, the City of Richmond (City) had recorded a "special assessment" lien against the property for unpaid garbage collection fees, pursuant to a municipal ordinance. When Kahan later sold the property, he had to pay the delinquen
Kahan v. City of Richmondpublic domain
Filed 5/23/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE TOBIAS KAHAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, A150866 v. CITY OF RICHMOND, (Contra Costa County Super.
City of New York v. Chevron Corp.public domain
18-2188 City of New York v. Chevron Corp. 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 For the Second Circuit 3 4 5 August Term 2019 6 7 Argued: November 22, 2019 8 Decided: April 1, 2021 9 10 No. 18-2188 11 12 13 CITY OF
Harb v. City of Bakersfieldpublic domain
Opinion FRANSON, J. — Mohamad Harb, M.D., was driving home from his shift at Kern Medical Center’s neonatal intensive care unit when he suffered a stroke and drove his car onto a sidewalk. The police officer who arrived at the scene did not call an ambulance immediately because she deduced from Dr. Harb’s vomiting, slurred speech and disorientation that he was
City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by ORDER AND and through the San Francisco AMENDED C
In re City of Detroitpublic domain
Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <
City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by OPINION and through the San Francisco City Attorney Denni
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP P.L.C.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1644 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BP P.L.C.; BP AMERICA, INC.; BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; CROWN CENTRAL LLC; CROWN CENTRAL NEW HOLDINGS LLC; CHEVRON CORP.; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXON MOBIL CORP.; EXXON
McDonald v. City of Chicagopublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Ralph v. City of New Orleanspublic domain
4 So.3d 146 (2009) Eugene RALPH, Gregory Pembo, Helen E, Robinson, Phyllis Everage, Lionel Brakitt and Elle Bennett v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and the New Orleans City Council. No. 2008-CA-0767. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 15, 2009. *148 J. Michael Johnson, Alliance Defense Fund, Shreveport, LA, and Jame
Alexander v. City of South Bendpublic domain
320 F.Supp.2d 761 (2004) ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SOUTH BEND, et al., Defendants. No. 3:02-CV-0397 CAN. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. May 18, 2004. *762 *763 *764 *765 Roseann P
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PATTI B. SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (“Kaiser”), Aetna, Inc. (“Aetna”), and Guardian Life Insurance Company (“Guardian”), collectively the Coordinated Plaintiffs, bring this case against Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influ
County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, No. 18-15499 individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-04929-VC v. CHEVRON CORPORATION; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION; BP PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; SHELL PLC; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILLIPS; CONOCOP
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, No. 18-15499 individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-04929-VC v. CHEVRON CORPORATION; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION; BP PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILL