⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Armstrong v. SSA”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-02-04 · Published · cited 20× · 987 F.3d 314
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1989 GARY KIRK, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-01-07 · Published · cited 6× · 759 F. Supp. 2d 89; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1647; 2011 WL 49547
759 F.Supp.2d 89 (2011) William H. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Karen THOMPSON, et al. Defendants, United States of America, Respondent. Civil Action No. 10-945 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 7, 2011. *90 Kevin E. Byrnes, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaint
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) WILLIAM H. ARMSTRONG ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-945 (RBW) ) KAREN THOMPSON, et al. )
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017-09-30 · Published · cited 6× · 278 F. Supp. 3d 1193
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed March 15, 2016 (Doc. 8)(“First Motion”); and (ii) the' Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Against Administrative Law Judge Miriam Fernandez-Rice, filed April 19, 2016 (Doc. 18)(“Second Motion”).1 The Cou
Armstrong v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008-08-04 · Published · cited 9× · 569 F. Supp. 2d 888; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107561; 2008 WL 2971400
(2008) Aruchunan Anthony ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ. No. 07-4310 (JNE/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 4, 2008. ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and aft
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1996-12-18 · Published · cited 18× · 205 B.R. 386; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1781; 1996 WL 788661
205 B.R. 386 (1996) In re Terry Hall ARMSTRONG, Debtor. Teresa Dawn ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Terry Hall ARMSTRONG, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 96-10742, Adv. No. 96-5128. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. December 18, 1996. *387 *388 John Van Den Bosch, Jackso
Wilson v. SSApublic domain
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014-05-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 DNH 100
Wilson v. SSA 13-CV-285-PB 5/6/14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Richard Arthur Wilson v. Civil No. 13-cv-285-PB Opinion No. 2014 DNH 100 P Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Richard Arthur Wilson seeks judicial review of a ruling by the
Hurd v. SSApublic domain
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008-02-25 · Published · cited 2× · 2008 DNH 044
Hurd v. SSA CV-07-216-PB 02/25/08 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CaroleLynn Hurd, a.k.a. CaroleLynn Gabert Civil N o . 07-cv-216-PB Document N o . 2008 DNH 044__ Commissioner, Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff CaroleLynn Hurd moves to reverse the Social Secu
Berthiaume v. SSApublic domain
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
Berthiaume v. SSA CV-98-419-M 09/30/99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Elizabeth Berthiaume, Claimant v. Civil No. 98-419-M Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. O R D E R Claimant Elizabeth Berthiaume moves pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to reverse the Commissioner's deci
Armstrong v. Bowenpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 648 F. Supp. 309; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18149
ORDER CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge. This is an appeal by the Claimant from the denial of disability benefits under the Social Security Act. Claimant has not worked since February 2, 1982, when he sustained an on-the-job back injury. He applied for disability benefits on August 29, 1983. His application was denied administratively, both initially and on reconsideration. Claimant then requested a hearing
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 19, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE, EX REL., ASHLEY MITCHELL v. PATRICK D. ARMSTRONG Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. J8823 Herbert J. Lane, Judge No. W2003-01687-COA-R3-JV - Filed September 3, 2004 This is a Title IV child support case.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989-07-19 · Published · cited 1× · 879 F.2d 437; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10290; 1989 WL 78733
FAGG, Circuit Judge. In response to Peggy Armstrong’s application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, see 42 U.S.C. § 1381a (Supp. IV 1986), the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) determined Armstrong was not disabled, id. § 1382c(a)(3) (1982 & Supp. IV 1986). Thus, Armstrong failed to qualify for SSI. Without a change in her physical condition, Armstrong later sought benefi
Bier v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2014-04-23 · Published · cited 0× · 15 F. Supp. 3d 1143; 2014 WL 1677518; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60809
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, United States Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Reverse and Remand for a Rehearing, with Supporting Memorandum [Doc. 15] (“Motion”), filed on Sep*1145tember 25, 2013. The Commissioner responded on November 22, 2013. [Doc. 16]. Plaintiff replied on
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 349 F. Supp. 3d 1149
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand for Rehearing with Supporting Memorandum, filed January 24, 2018 (Doc. 24)("Motion"). The Motion is fully briefed. See Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand the Agency's Administrative Decision, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 26)("Response"); Reply in Support
Riordan v. Garcespublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 02290
Riordan v Garces (2023 NY Slip Op 02290) Riordan v Garces 2023 NY Slip Op 02290 Decided on May 02, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <
Riordan v. Garcespublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-05-02 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 02290
Riordan v Garces (2023 NY Slip Op 02290) Riordan v Garces 2023 NY Slip Op 02290 Decided on May 02, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
04/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 2, 2024 NEDRA R. HASTINGS v. LARRY M. HASTINGS, JR. Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Shelby County No. R-2487 Nancy Percer Kessler, Judge No. W2020-01225-COA-
Lyda v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2016-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 221 F. Supp. 3d 1254; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159532; 2016 WL 6500874
ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed October 16, 2015, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq.
Johnson v. Johnsonpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3855
Johnson v Johnson (2019 NY Slip Op 03855) Johnson v Johnson 2019 NY Slip Op 03855 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 365 F. App'x 842
MEMORANDUM * Appellant Mark DeClements (“DeCle-ments”) appeals from the district court’s upholding of a partially favorable social security determination, seeking four more months of disability benefits. DeClements contends that the uncontroverted examining physicians’ reports establish that he was disabled as of January 16, 2002, not as of May 27,2002, as the ALJ found. On April 17, 2002,