Cases

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, DISMISSING COMPLAINT, AND REFERRING ATTORNEY RICHARD J. DOUD TO THE CHIEF JUDGE FOR POSSIBLE DISCIPLINE DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Plaintiff John Armstrong filed the prese

*279MEMORANDUM** Sylvia Armstrong appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration. We exercise our jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. Armstrong principally objects to the Administrative Law Judge’s reliance on the conclusions of a non-treating, consulting physi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VERNELIS K. ARMSTRONG, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Ciara Marie Davila (“Plaintiff’) seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of Defendant Commissioner’s (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) final determination denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.

TROTT, Circuit Judge: I. OVERVIEW Jerry Armstrong (“Armstrong”) appeals a district court decision affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying him Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). Armstrong filed applications for DIB and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). After a hearing, the ALJ found Armstrong disabled and awarded SSI but denied disability benefits. The district court affir

McKAY, Circuit Judge. Claimant Tony L. Madrid appeals from a district court order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

PER CURIAM. Claimant Rita D. Robinson appeals from the magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her applications for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits. 1 Claimant contends the Commissioner erred in (1) not giving controlling weight to the opinion of her treating physic

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER William H. Baughman, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge Introduction Before me1 is an action by Denise Renee Sito under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits.2 The Commissioner has

OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Docs. 1, 17, 18, 19] JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong recommends this Court affirm the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income to Plaintiff Belinda Henry.1 Because substantial evidence supported the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) c

OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. This case sought review, under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On September 6, 2012, this Court reversed the decision of the Commissioner and remanded the action to the Commi

OPINION AND ORDER Malcolm P. Marsh, United States District Judge Plaintiff Suzanne E. Sutherland seeks judicial review of the partially favorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). For t

(2008) Aruchunan Anthony ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ. No. 07-4310 (JNE/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 4, 2008. ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and aft

434 F.Supp.2d 543 (2006) David ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. No. 05 C 3059. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 18, 2006. *544 *545 Ashley S. Rose, Glen Ellyn, Counsel for Plaintiff. Cynthia A. Bra

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Angela Lee Dunkle, seeks judicial review of a decision of Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI, respectively, of the Social Security Ac

628 F.3d 269 (2010) Cathy D. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-4387. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 9, 2010. Decided and Filed: December 23, 2010. *270 ARGUED: W. David Koeninger, Advocates for Basic Legal Equality, Inc.,

698 F.Supp.2d 335 (2010) Marin CANALES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-5019 (FB)(SMG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 26, 2010. *336 Richard P. Morris, Esq., Klein, Wagner & Morris, on the brief Christopher J. Bowes, Esq., New York, NY, for the Plaintiff. Be

MEMORANDUM *** Margaret DeBerry (“DeBerry”) appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. DeBerry asserts that the ALJ: (1) did not properly apply Social Security Regulation 83-20; (2) erred in rejecting the opinion of Dr. Ruth Lowen

287 F.Supp.2d 881 (2003) Floyd ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 02 C 7572. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 15, 2003. *882 Timothy R. White, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Kathryn A. Beverly, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM *** Margaret DeBerry (“DeBerry”) appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. DeBerry asserts that the ALJ: (1) did not properly apply Social Security Regulation 83-20; (2) erred in rejecting the opinion of Dr. Ruth Lowen

160 F.3d 587 59 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 1, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 16130B,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,859Jerry ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-36073. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 5, 1998.*Decided

537 F.Supp.2d 823 (2008) Lela M. McNAIR, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:05-CV-1889-B (BH). United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 6, 2008. *824 Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Law Office of Elizabeth B. Dunlap, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Stephen P.